Content and design considerations for digital supportive care tools for patients with cancer: A textual statistical analysis of patients’, relatives’, and healthcare professionals’ perspectives
6 affiliations
- 1Université of Lille, CNRS, UMR - SCALab - Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, Lille, France.
- 2Université Paris Cité, Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
- 3Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
- 4Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
- 5Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
- 6Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
Access to supportive care remains a major public health concern. Digital tools are increasingly used in healthcare to address supportive care needs. It is essential to understand the needs and perspectives of the end users of these tools, including patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals (HCPs), to design and implement an option that effectively supports cancer patients and their relatives. This study was conducted to document and compare the perspectives of patients, relatives, and HCPs in France to identify perceived facilitators and barriers to the use of digital supportive care tools, as well as these individuals’ expectations regarding tool development. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with three different groups: 38 patients with cancer (including two unusable interviews), 20 relatives, and 43 HCPs. The interviews were analysed using textual statistical analysis in IRaMuTeQ. Four classes emerged from the analysis: (1) cancer experience, (2) patient care, (3) imagination and positioning in the conceptualisation of the digital tool: the content, and (4) tool shape: the container. Across the three groups, there was broad agreement regarding identified needs and potential solutions. Participants did not conceptualise digital supportive tools as a care or treatment device, but rather as an informational and reflexive space, centred on the ability to seek, think, choose, and express oneself, while preserving human mediation. This finding is important because it highlights a shift in digital health toward a customisable empowerment tool that integrates patients and relatives, accounts for usage barriers, and is designed as an optional complement rather than a prescriptive solution. The results also highlight the importance of user-centred, accessible, and tailored approaches in tool development.
Related
- The precarious nature of musical encounters in healthcare: An ethnographic multi-case study focusing on the perspectives of care professionals and musicians
- Knowledge and attitudes toward antimicrobial stewardship and the WHO AWaRe antibiotic classification among healthcare professionals at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia
- Bringing developmental science closer to families: Caregivers’ and professionals’ perspectives on participation in early childhood research
- A Personalized Recovery Intervention to Support Sleep Health in Emergency Healthcare Professionals
- The public health utility of whole genome sequencing: Insights from a tuberculosis outbreak in Australia and perspectives of public health professionals
BibTeX
@article{zanni2026content,
title = {{Content and design considerations for digital supportive care tools for patients with cancer: A textual statistical analysis of patients’, relatives’, and healthcare professionals’ perspectives}},
author = {Louise Zanni and Martin Rebillon and Ambre Naeyaert and Valentyn Fournier and Lisa Laroussi-Libeault and Pauline Justin and Pascal Antoine and Carole Haryan and Louise Richez and Kristopher Lamore},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0360665},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360665},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Content and design considerations for digital supportive care tools for patients with cancer: A textual statistical analysis of patients’, relatives’, and healthcare professionals’ perspectives
AU - Louise Zanni
AU - Martin Rebillon
AU - Ambre Naeyaert
AU - Valentyn Fournier
AU - Lisa Laroussi-Libeault
AU - Pauline Justin
AU - Pascal Antoine
AU - Carole Haryan
AU - Louise Richez
AU - Kristopher Lamore
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/29
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0360665
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360665
AB - Access to supportive care remains a major public health concern. Digital tools are increasingly used in healthcare to address supportive care needs. It is essential to understand the needs and perspectives of the end users of these tools, including patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals (HCPs), to design and implement an option that effectively supports cancer patients and their relatives. This study was conducted to document and compare the perspectives of patients, relatives, and HCPs in France to identify perceived facilitators and barriers to the use of digital supportive care tools, as well as these individuals’ expectations regarding tool development. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with three different groups: 38 patients with cancer (including two unusable interviews), 20 relatives, and 43 HCPs. The interviews were analysed using textual statistical analysis in IRaMuTeQ. Four classes emerged from the analysis: (1) cancer experience, (2) patient care, (3) imagination and positioning in the conceptualisation of the digital tool: the content, and (4) tool shape: the container. Across the three groups, there was broad agreement regarding identified needs and potential solutions. Participants did not conceptualise digital supportive tools as a care or treatment device, but rather as an informational and reflexive space, centred on the ability to seek, think, choose, and express oneself, while preserving human mediation. This finding is important because it highlights a shift in digital health toward a customisable empowerment tool that integrates patients and relatives, accounts for usage barriers, and is designed as an optional complement rather than a prescriptive solution. The results also highlight the importance of user-centred, accessible, and tailored approaches in tool development.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -