Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Controlled-illumination smartphone imaging for quantitative turbidity measurement and cross-device transfer

Abstract

Smartphone imaging could provide a low-cost turbidity measurement method if illumination and acquisition geometry are controlled. We evaluated a 3D-printed enclosure with fixed illumination and a submerged optical target using 162 milk-based suspensions spanning 0.16--50.2 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU), with a portable turbidimeter as the reference. An EfficientNetB0 regression model evaluated using repeated five-fold grouped cross-validation achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.208 NTU and R2=0.9816, indicating that predictions followed the reference measurements closely. The MAE was 0.335 NTU below 1 NTU and 0.449 NTU from 1 to below 5 NTU; classification accuracy at the operational 5-NTU threshold was 0.9753. When applied without retraining to 103 paired images from a second smartphone, prediction error remained comparable to that on the development smartphone below 10 NTU, but turbidity was increasingly underestimated at higher values. The results demonstrate the measurement performance attainable with a controlled smartphone acquisition system, quantify an important device-dependent transfer limitation, and motivate standardized multi-device acquisition and prospective natural-water validation.

Related

  1. Spectral Optimization of Programmable LED Illumination for Smartphone-Based Colorimetric Biosensor Readout.
    Elena Serea, Codrin Donciu, Marinel Costel Temneanu
    BiosensorsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textAtomic, molecular & optical physicsEurope PMC
  2. A Spatial Light Modulator–Based Polarizing Nulling Interferometer for Quantitative Measurement of Multiple Optical Surface Geometries
    Dahi Ibrahim, Andrew Lambert, Nicholas Devaney
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedLicence not statedOptics & photonicsCrossref
  3. Quantitative measurement of fluid inertial effects in confined Brownian motion
    Quentin Ferreira, Pablo Palacios-Alonso, Harshit Joshi +3
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterFluid dynamicsHALarXiv
  4. Ordering controlled by the measurement-feedback interval in quantum Boltzmann samplers
    Peng Wang, Yu-Xuan Zhang, Hai-Tao Ding +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Particle settling in turbidity currents: concentration-gradient-driven biased sampling
    Lianzheng Cui, Eric Climent, Graham O. Hughes +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textFluid dynamicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{olivares2026controlledillumination,
  title = {{Controlled-illumination smartphone imaging for quantitative turbidity measurement and cross-device transfer}},
  author = {Sebastian Olivares and Addles Castillo and Patricia Velasquez and Roxana Arce and Nicolas Richardson},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.03412},
  eprint = {2610.03412},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03412},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Controlled-illumination smartphone imaging for quantitative turbidity measurement and cross-device transfer
AU  - Sebastian Olivares
AU  - Addles Castillo
AU  - Patricia Velasquez
AU  - Roxana Arce
AU  - Nicolas Richardson
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.03412
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03412
AB  - Smartphone imaging could provide a low-cost turbidity measurement method if illumination and acquisition geometry are controlled. We evaluated a 3D-printed enclosure with fixed illumination and a submerged optical target using 162 milk-based suspensions spanning 0.16--50.2 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU), with a portable turbidimeter as the reference. An EfficientNetB0 regression model evaluated using repeated five-fold grouped cross-validation achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.208 NTU and R^2=0.9816, indicating that predictions followed the reference measurements closely. The MAE was 0.335 NTU below 1 NTU and 0.449 NTU from 1 to below 5 NTU; classification accuracy at the operational 5-NTU threshold was 0.9753. When applied without retraining to 103 paired images from a second smartphone, prediction error remained comparable to that on the development smartphone below 10 NTU, but turbidity was increasingly underestimated at higher values. The results demonstrate the measurement performance attainable with a controlled smartphone acquisition system, quantify an important device-dependent transfer limitation, and motivate standardized multi-device acquisition and prospective natural-water validation.
ER  -