Not everywhere, not always: 30 targeted PFAS in ambient surface waters of Queensland, Australia.
- 1Department of Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation, Water Quality Monitoring and Investigations, Water Ecosystem Science, Ecosciences Precinct, Yuggera, Dutton Park, GPO Box 2454, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia. [email protected].
- 2Department of Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation, Water Quality Monitoring and Investigations, Water Ecosystem Science, Ecosciences Precinct, Yuggera, Dutton Park, GPO Box 2454, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia.
Abstract
This study provides a summary of ambient concentrations of 30 commonly analysed perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) at 54 sites adjacent to various land use types across the east coast of Queensland, Australia. Sites were sampled for surface water every 2 months for a year (2019-2020). The results showed higher concentrations of PFAS in surface waters adjacent to major city areas (e.g. urban, industrial, residential land use types), and the lowest in surface waters adjacent to remote and regional areas (e.g. national parks, agriculture land use types). Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) was the most reported compound (in 53% of samples), ranging from < 0.1 to 0.4 ng L⁻¹ in remote areas, < 0.1 to 0.6 ng L⁻¹ in outer regional areas, < 0.1 to 4.7 ng L⁻¹ in inner regional areas, and < 0.1 to 37.0 ng L⁻¹ in major cities. No PFAS were reported at nine of the 54 sites during the six monitoring rounds, and 16 out of 30 PFAS were not reported at any of the sites sampled over the year. Although PFAS (such as PFOS) are described as ubiquitous, the results from this ambient monitoring program indicate that this assumption does not necessarily apply to all ambient surface waters in Queensland.
Related
- A Response Surface Methodology Framework for Targeted MALDI‑TIMS Optimization and in‑Tissue Metabolite Resolution
- Flash Production of High-Purity V3.5+ Electrolyte via Electron Beam-Induced Radiolysis Under Ambient Conditions
- Ambient-Condition Visualization of Metalloenzyme Reactive Intermediates Enabled by the SHINERS Paradigm
- Electronic Spectroscopy of Atomic Defects in Molybdenum Disulfide under Ambient Conditions
- Selective benzylic C-H electrochemical oxygenation under ambient air promoted by an Fe-N-C electrocatalyst.
BibTeX
@article{baddiley2026everywhere,
title = {{Not everywhere, not always: 30 targeted PFAS in ambient surface waters of Queensland, Australia.}},
author = {Brenda Baddiley and Albert Myburgh and Suzanne Vardy},
journal = {Environmental monitoring and assessment},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1007/s10661-026-16030-5},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900285},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Not everywhere, not always: 30 targeted PFAS in ambient surface waters of Queensland, Australia.
AU - Brenda Baddiley
AU - Albert Myburgh
AU - Suzanne Vardy
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/20
JO - Environmental monitoring and assessment
DO - 10.1007/s10661-026-16030-5
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900285
AB - This study provides a summary of ambient concentrations of 30 commonly analysed perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) at 54 sites adjacent to various land use types across the east coast of Queensland, Australia. Sites were sampled for surface water every 2 months for a year (2019-2020). The results showed higher concentrations of PFAS in surface waters adjacent to major city areas (e.g. urban, industrial, residential land use types), and the lowest in surface waters adjacent to remote and regional areas (e.g. national parks, agriculture land use types). Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) was the most reported compound (in 53% of samples), ranging from < 0.1 to 0.4 ng L⁻¹ in remote areas, < 0.1 to 0.6 ng L⁻¹ in outer regional areas, < 0.1 to 4.7 ng L⁻¹ in inner regional areas, and < 0.1 to 37.0 ng L⁻¹ in major cities. No PFAS were reported at nine of the 54 sites during the six monitoring rounds, and 16 out of 30 PFAS were not reported at any of the sites sampled over the year. Although PFAS (such as PFOS) are described as ubiquitous, the results from this ambient monitoring program indicate that this assumption does not necessarily apply to all ambient surface waters in Queensland.
SN - 0167-6369
SN - 1573-2959
ER -