Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,631 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Distinguishing cold and self-interacting dark matter through topological analysis

Abstract

Alternative dark matter (DM) models have emerged to solve the challenges faced by the predictions of collisionless cold dark matter (CDM) on galactic scales (≲ 1 Mpc). However, disentangling alternative models from CDM is difficult on such small scales because of the degeneracy with baryonic physics. It is therefore necessary to use DM probes that are not affected by baryons, e.g. that stand on intermediate scales, larger than galactic while remaining smaller than the scale at which the models converge to CDM. For the first time, we distinguish self-interacting DM (SIDM) from CDM using the genus statistic, a metric that characterises the topology of the density field. We carried out the analysis on the Darkium DM-only cosmological simulations, using one CDM model and four SIDM models with cross-sections of various amplitudes and velocity dependencies. We computed the genus on selected 3-virial radius wide regions centred around halos, for few hundred halos with masses ranging from 1012 to 1014 M⊙/h over redshifts z=0 to z=2. We also explored a more observation-like configuration, where the DM density field is traced only from the halo distribution in thick 2D projection since in principle redshift errors hinder a 3D reconstruction of the density field. We find that the density field is systematically clumpier in CDM than in SIDM models up to 0.05 Mpc/h, for halos of masses larger than 1012 M⊙/h at z=0. These predictions show that the genus of the density field is sensitive to DM self-interactions, suggesting that topological analysis could provide a valuable probe for distinguishing SIDM from CDM in observed halo distributions.

Related

  1. Semi-Analytic Predictions for Strong-Lensing Perturbers in Cold and Self-Interacting Dark Matter
    Jonathan Tekverk, Duncan K. Adams, Simon Birrer +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  2. AT2025agpz in Rubin commissioning data: distinguishing a luminous interacting supernova from nuclear transients in compact galaxies
    C.R Angus, M Quilt, H.F Stevance +37
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral astronomyGeneral physicsHAL
  3. Distinguishing the origin of cosmic birefringence: dark energy, dark matter, and neutrino asymmetry
    Lu Yin, Eiichiro Komatsu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyHigh-energy astrophysicsarXiv
  4. Revisiting self-interacting dark matter with DESI DR2 baryon acoustic oscillation observations
    Yixuan Zhu, Shuo Cao, Xuanni chen +3
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsCosmologyCrossref
  5. Distinguishing Coupled Dark Matter Dark Energy from Kinematic Phantom Crossing
    Samit Ganguly, Koushik Dutta, Goutam Manna
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textCosmologyGravitation & general relativityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{szpilfidel2026distinguishing,
  title = {{Distinguishing cold and self-interacting dark matter through topological analysis}},
  author = {Adrian Szpilfidel and Clotilde Laigle and Pierre Boldrini and Moritz S. Fischer and Dmitri Pogosyan},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.25632},
  eprint = {2608.25632},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25632},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Distinguishing cold and self-interacting dark matter through topological analysis
AU  - Adrian Szpilfidel
AU  - Clotilde Laigle
AU  - Pierre Boldrini
AU  - Moritz S. Fischer
AU  - Dmitri Pogosyan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.25632
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25632
AB  - Alternative dark matter (DM) models have emerged to solve the challenges faced by the predictions of collisionless cold dark matter (CDM) on galactic scales (≲ 1 Mpc). However, disentangling alternative models from CDM is difficult on such small scales because of the degeneracy with baryonic physics. It is therefore necessary to use DM probes that are not affected by baryons, e.g. that stand on intermediate scales, larger than galactic while remaining smaller than the scale at which the models converge to CDM. For the first time, we distinguish self-interacting DM (SIDM) from CDM using the genus statistic, a metric that characterises the topology of the density field. We carried out the analysis on the Darkium DM-only cosmological simulations, using one CDM model and four SIDM models with cross-sections of various amplitudes and velocity dependencies. We computed the genus on selected 3-virial radius wide regions centred around halos, for few hundred halos with masses ranging from 10^12 to 10^14 M_⊙/h over redshifts z=0 to z=2. We also explored a more observation-like configuration, where the DM density field is traced only from the halo distribution in thick 2D projection since in principle redshift errors hinder a 3D reconstruction of the density field. We find that the density field is systematically clumpier in CDM than in SIDM models up to 0.05 Mpc/h, for halos of masses larger than 10^12 M_⊙/h at z=0. These predictions show that the genus of the density field is sensitive to DM self-interactions, suggesting that topological analysis could provide a valuable probe for distinguishing SIDM from CDM in observed halo distributions.
ER  -