Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Polymers

Material-Dependent Effect of Heat Treatment on the Low-Velocity Impact Response of Additively Manufactured PA6 and PA6-CF Gyroid-Core Sandwich Structures

  1. 1Department of Industrial Design Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Erciyes University, Kayseri 38039, Türkiye

Abstract

Sandwich structures with gyroid cores produced via additive manufacturing show promise for lightweight impact-absorbing applications due to the stable plateau response provided by their continuous surface geometries; however, the effect of post-printing thermal history on the impact behavior of these structures has not been sufficiently investigated. In this study, three sandwich configurations were produced with 2 mm face sheets, a 10 mm core thickness, and a 10 mm gyroid cell size: all-PA6, all-PA6-CF, and a hybrid structure consisting of PA6-CF face sheets and a PA6 core. Non-heat-treated (Non-HT) and heat-treated (HT, 170 °C for 4 h) specimens were subjected to low-velocity impact at energy levels of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 J; peak force, absorbed energy, energy absorption efficiency (the ratio of absorbed energy to impact energy), and specific energy absorption (SEA) were compared. The effect of heat treatment depended on the material configuration and impact energy. DSC analyses showed that heat treatment increased the degree of crystallinity in PA6-CF from 6.4% to 11.4%, while in PA6, it increased only from 6.2% to 6.7%. In the PA6-CF configuration, heat treatment reduced the peak force by 28% and 34% at 15 and 20 J, respectively (8.41→6.04 kN; 8.20→5.42 kN), while increasing the absorbed energy from 17.5 J to 19.8 J at 20 J and giving the highest SEA of 0.243 J/g at 25 J. In the unreinforced PA6 configuration, heat treatment reduced the absorbed energy at 25 J from 15.7 J to 11.3 J and the energy absorption efficiency from 63% to 45%. The hybrid configuration exhibited the most stable response, with efficiencies of 92–101% in both cases within the 10–20 J range and limited peak forces in the 2.6–3.4 kN range. The findings indicate that post-printing heat treatment is an effective parameter for adjusting impact performance without changing the geometry or material, but that the direction of its effect depends on the presence of fiber reinforcement and the impact energy.

Related

  1. Mechanical and Thermomechanical Performance Evaluation of CFRP Sandwich Structures with Additively Manufactured Composite Cores
    Alexandru Ciubotariu, Teodor-Adrian Badea, Madalina Mustareata +6
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. Mechanical and Thermomechanical Response of Co-Cured QFRP Sandwich Structures with Additively Manufactured Fibre-Reinforced Gyroid Cores
    Vlad Buga, Teodor Adrian Badea, Madalina-Andreea Mustareata +6
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. Temperature-dependent deformation behavior of the additively manufactured Al0.75CrFeNi2.1 alloy using in-situ high energy X-ray diffraction
    I. Cazic, P. Barriobero-Vila, N. Navaeilavasani +5
    Journal of Alloys and CompoundsPeer-reviewedCC BYMaterials & polymersHAL
  4. Heat Treatment Effects on Additively Manufactured Polymer Matrix Composites
    Germán Omar Barrionuevo, Felipe Fernández, Yuvaraj Ravishankar Chappidi +4
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMCCrossref
  5. Influence of Post-Processing by Annealing on Additive Manufacturing Productivity and Mechanical Properties in Three-Point Bending of Additively Manufactured Specimens from PETG and Recycled PETG
    Dragos Gabriel Zisopol, Mihail Minescu, Dragos Valentin Iacob +1
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{yılmaz2026materialdependent,
  title = {{Material-Dependent Effect of Heat Treatment on the Low-Velocity Impact Response of Additively Manufactured PA6 and PA6-CF Gyroid-Core Sandwich Structures}},
  author = {Erkan Yılmaz},
  journal = {Polymers},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3390/polym18212792},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/21/2792},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Material-Dependent Effect of Heat Treatment on the Low-Velocity Impact Response of Additively Manufactured PA6 and PA6-CF Gyroid-Core Sandwich Structures
AU  - Erkan Yılmaz
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/08
JO  - Polymers
DO  - 10.3390/polym18212792
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/21/2792
AB  - Sandwich structures with gyroid cores produced via additive manufacturing show promise for lightweight impact-absorbing applications due to the stable plateau response provided by their continuous surface geometries; however, the effect of post-printing thermal history on the impact behavior of these structures has not been sufficiently investigated. In this study, three sandwich configurations were produced with 2 mm face sheets, a 10 mm core thickness, and a 10 mm gyroid cell size: all-PA6, all-PA6-CF, and a hybrid structure consisting of PA6-CF face sheets and a PA6 core. Non-heat-treated (Non-HT) and heat-treated (HT, 170 °C for 4 h) specimens were subjected to low-velocity impact at energy levels of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 J; peak force, absorbed energy, energy absorption efficiency (the ratio of absorbed energy to impact energy), and specific energy absorption (SEA) were compared. The effect of heat treatment depended on the material configuration and impact energy. DSC analyses showed that heat treatment increased the degree of crystallinity in PA6-CF from 6.4% to 11.4%, while in PA6, it increased only from 6.2% to 6.7%. In the PA6-CF configuration, heat treatment reduced the peak force by 28% and 34% at 15 and 20 J, respectively (8.41→6.04 kN; 8.20→5.42 kN), while increasing the absorbed energy from 17.5 J to 19.8 J at 20 J and giving the highest SEA of 0.243 J/g at 25 J. In the unreinforced PA6 configuration, heat treatment reduced the absorbed energy at 25 J from 15.7 J to 11.3 J and the energy absorption efficiency from 63% to 45%. The hybrid configuration exhibited the most stable response, with efficiencies of 92–101% in both cases within the 10–20 J range and limited peak forces in the 2.6–3.4 kN range. The findings indicate that post-printing heat treatment is an effective parameter for adjusting impact performance without changing the geometry or material, but that the direction of its effect depends on the presence of fiber reinforcement and the impact energy.
SN  - 2073-4360
ER  -