Delusion of Pregnancy: An Updated Systematic Review.
- 1Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10124 Turin, Italy.
- 2Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Ul. Szczęśliwicka 40, 02-353 Warsaw, Poland.
Abstract
Delusion of pregnancy (DoP) is a rare psychopathological symptom characterised by the fixed, delusional conviction of being pregnant in the absence of objective evidence. The systematic review by Bera and Sarkar remains, to this day, the principal quantitative reference on the phenomenon, based on 84 cases published up to August 2014. The aim of the present work is to update this case series by including literature published between September 2014 and August 2026, and to analyse any clinical and aetiological differences that emerge relative to the original sample. Thirty-two new cases were identified from 18 publications, extracted using the same categorical grid employed in the original study and integrated with the 84 historical cases (combined sample, n = 116). All comparisons between the original and updated subsamples reported below are descriptive and exploratory; no inferential statistical testing was performed, and the reported percentages should not be interpreted as validated effect sizes. The general profile of the disorder-female predominance, schizophrenia as the most frequent underlying diagnosis, monofetal presentation, good overall treatment response-is substantially confirmed. The most marked differences between the two subsamples concern a higher proportion, among recently published cases, of organic/geriatric presentations (28.1% vs. 4.8%) and coenaesthopathic processes (43.8% vs. 20.2%); however, sensitivity analysis indicated that both differences are substantially attenuated (to 14.8% and 33.3%, respectively) once a single five-case series is excluded, suggesting that publication-level clustering, rather than a genuine population-level temporal trend, plausibly accounts for much of this apparent shift. The data suggest, on an exploratory basis, the clinical usefulness of distinguishing a primary form, of complex delusional origin, from a secondary form due to somatic misinterpretation-a distinction presented here as a hypothesis-generating proposal, not as a validated clinical typology, with potential implications for the diagnostic assessment pathway and for pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatment approaches, to be confirmed through prospective, controlled study designs.
Related
- Physical exercise and esports performance: an updated systematic review and study-level meta-analysis
- Transthoracic echocardiography vs. cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of left ventricular thrombus: an updated systematic review and diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis
- Subcutaneous versus transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Efficacy and safety of P2X3 receptor antagonists in refractory or unexplained chronic cough: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
- Aspirin-Based Thromboprophylaxis Versus Anticoagulant Regimens After Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
BibTeX
@article{fabris2026delusion,
title = {{Delusion of Pregnancy: An Updated Systematic Review.}},
author = {Matteo Angelo Fabris and Dawid Konrad Ścigała},
journal = {Journal of clinical medicine},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.3390/jcm15197403},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42881865},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Delusion of Pregnancy: An Updated Systematic Review.
AU - Matteo Angelo Fabris
AU - Dawid Konrad Ścigała
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/23
JO - Journal of clinical medicine
DO - 10.3390/jcm15197403
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42881865
AB - Delusion of pregnancy (DoP) is a rare psychopathological symptom characterised by the fixed, delusional conviction of being pregnant in the absence of objective evidence. The systematic review by Bera and Sarkar remains, to this day, the principal quantitative reference on the phenomenon, based on 84 cases published up to August 2014. The aim of the present work is to update this case series by including literature published between September 2014 and August 2026, and to analyse any clinical and aetiological differences that emerge relative to the original sample. Thirty-two new cases were identified from 18 publications, extracted using the same categorical grid employed in the original study and integrated with the 84 historical cases (combined sample, n = 116). All comparisons between the original and updated subsamples reported below are descriptive and exploratory; no inferential statistical testing was performed, and the reported percentages should not be interpreted as validated effect sizes. The general profile of the disorder-female predominance, schizophrenia as the most frequent underlying diagnosis, monofetal presentation, good overall treatment response-is substantially confirmed. The most marked differences between the two subsamples concern a higher proportion, among recently published cases, of organic/geriatric presentations (28.1% vs. 4.8%) and coenaesthopathic processes (43.8% vs. 20.2%); however, sensitivity analysis indicated that both differences are substantially attenuated (to 14.8% and 33.3%, respectively) once a single five-case series is excluded, suggesting that publication-level clustering, rather than a genuine population-level temporal trend, plausibly accounts for much of this apparent shift. The data suggest, on an exploratory basis, the clinical usefulness of distinguishing a primary form, of complex delusional origin, from a secondary form due to somatic misinterpretation-a distinction presented here as a hypothesis-generating proposal, not as a validated clinical typology, with potential implications for the diagnostic assessment pathway and for pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatment approaches, to be confirmed through prospective, controlled study designs.
SN - 2077-0383
ER -