Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Combining stated and revealed preferences to define smallholder cattle breeding objectives in northwest Ethiopia: Evidence for breeding program design

  1. 1Department of Animal Science, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia

Abstract

Identifying high-priority traits is essential for designing effective breeding programs in smallholder systems. This study employed both stated and revealed preference methods to identify priority traits for cattle breeding objectives among smallholders in northwest Ethiopia. Stated preferences were assessed using a discrete choice experiment (DCE), while revealed preferences were examined through a hedonic pricing approach. The two datasets were analyzed separately and their results compared to provide complementary insights. Data were collected between January and April 2024: 384 farmers participated in the choice survey across three districts (Farta = 91, Simada = 133, and Lay Gayint = 160), and 200 cattle transactions were recorded in three marketplaces—Debre Tabor, Simada, and Nefas Mewucha. Choice data were analyzed with a mixed logit model, and market data with a log-linear ordinary least squares regression. Results showed both convergence and divergence in trait preferences between methods. Farmers’ strong preference for large body size in the DCE (p < 0.001) aligned with the significant positive effects of body condition and live body weight on market price (p < 0.001). However, traits not visually observable at sale—such as milk yield, docility, disease tolerance, libido, calving interval, and calf vigor—were highly valued in stated preferences but not captured in market prices due to observability constraints and information asymmetry. Conversely, the hedonic model revealed market structure effects not captured by the DCE, including higher prices paid by traders and premiums for slaughter animals. These findings demonstrate that employing both methods provides a more comprehensive evidence base for defining breeding objectives—capturing both invisible livelihood-critical traits valued by farmers and market dynamics that shape real-world prices. The identified priority traits provide a foundation for subsequent research to estimate genetic parameters and economic weights to design a breeding program.

Related

  1. Smallholder farmers' preferences for public expenditure priorities to support maize productivity: evidence from a best–worst scaling experiment in western Kenya
    Fido Orawo, Dickson Okello, John Olwande
    Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyNutritionDOAJ
  2. Socioeconomic and biophysical drivers of cocoa yield variability in smallholder farms in Côte d’Ivoire
    Nanga Yéo, Serge Déméango Zon, Ebagnerin Jérôme Tondoh
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text5 citedPlant biologyOpenAlex
  3. Incentives are effective but insufficient to halt smallholder deforestation in the Colombian Amazon
    Hugo Charoud, Esteve Corbera, Lina Moros +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyZoology & animal behaviourPLOS
  4. Mediated influence of digital agriculture technologies on climate-smart agriculture decisions among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
    Calvince Andele Ogutu, Eunice Paula Armando Cavane
    Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text6 citedEcologyPlant biologyOpenAlex
  5. Perceived face similarity reflects inverse-generative and naturalistic discriminative objectives
    Wenxuan Guo, Heiko H. Schütt, Kamila Maria Jozwik +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNeurosciencearXiv
BibTeX
@article{abebe2026combining,
  title = {{Combining stated and revealed preferences to define smallholder cattle breeding objectives in northwest Ethiopia: Evidence for breeding program design}},
  author = {Abiy Shenkut Abebe and Belete Yazie and Melaku Menale},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0359944},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359944},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Combining stated and revealed preferences to define smallholder cattle breeding objectives in northwest Ethiopia: Evidence for breeding program design
AU  - Abiy Shenkut Abebe
AU  - Belete Yazie
AU  - Melaku Menale
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0359944
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359944
AB  - Identifying high-priority traits is essential for designing effective breeding programs in smallholder systems. This study employed both stated and revealed preference methods to identify priority traits for cattle breeding objectives among smallholders in northwest Ethiopia. Stated preferences were assessed using a discrete choice experiment (DCE), while revealed preferences were examined through a hedonic pricing approach. The two datasets were analyzed separately and their results compared to provide complementary insights. Data were collected between January and April 2024: 384 farmers participated in the choice survey across three districts (Farta = 91, Simada = 133, and Lay Gayint = 160), and 200 cattle transactions were recorded in three marketplaces—Debre Tabor, Simada, and Nefas Mewucha. Choice data were analyzed with a mixed logit model, and market data with a log-linear ordinary least squares regression. Results showed both convergence and divergence in trait preferences between methods. Farmers’ strong preference for large body size in the DCE (p < 0.001) aligned with the significant positive effects of body condition and live body weight on market price (p < 0.001). However, traits not visually observable at sale—such as milk yield, docility, disease tolerance, libido, calving interval, and calf vigor—were highly valued in stated preferences but not captured in market prices due to observability constraints and information asymmetry. Conversely, the hedonic model revealed market structure effects not captured by the DCE, including higher prices paid by traders and premiums for slaughter animals. These findings demonstrate that employing both methods provides a more comprehensive evidence base for defining breeding objectives—capturing both invisible livelihood-critical traits valued by farmers and market dynamics that shape real-world prices. The identified priority traits provide a foundation for subsequent research to estimate genetic parameters and economic weights to design a breeding program.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -