Incentives are effective but insufficient to halt smallholder deforestation in the Colombian Amazon
5 affiliations
- 1G-EAU, University of Montpellier, AgroParisTech, INRAE, Institut Agro, IRD, Montpellier, France
- 2Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
- 3Institute of Environmental Science and Technology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, UAB, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
- 4Department of Geography, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, UAB, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
- 5Facultad de Administración, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
Abstract
In this article, we assess the impact of two Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) initiatives aimed at deterring deforestation in the department of Guaviare, Colombia. The initiatives are the government-led Incentivo Forestal Amazónico (IFA), which is part of the country’s REDD+ strategy, and the NGO-driven Caminemos–Territorios Sostenibles (CTS) project, which supported sustainable land-use activities over a four-year period. We find that, combined, these initiatives prevented approximately 1,400 hectares of forest loss, though they differed in their annualized impacts (2.9% versus 3.8%). We argue that this difference likely reflects variations in the type of incentives provided, their geographic focus, and their overarching goals. IFA focuses on larger, less threatened forest patches across a broader area, providing cash payments to landowners whilst laying the foundations for a long-term conservation and management approach. CTS, in contrast, targeted smaller patches at higher risk of deforestation along Guaviare’s agricultural frontier, offering targeted technical assistance and payments for a series of conservation and restoration commitments at farm level, including the adoption of silvopastoral practices. Considering these findings, we argue that distinct PES designs can play a complementary role in halting deforestation in the Colombian Amazon, and potentially in similar regions across tropical America. We call for more sustained and scaled-up efforts in sustainable land use and forest conservation for smallholders, while recognizing that such initiatives will remain insufficient unless scaling is accompanied by substantially stronger territorial state presence and governance in areas contested by armed groups, as well as comprehensive land-use policy reform.
Related
- KDM6A Haploinsufficiency Is Insufficient to Disrupt Cochlear Structure and Auditory Function in Mouse Models of Kabuki Syndrome Type 2
- Nearly ninety percent of Indonesian coffee area is classified as deforestation-free under the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR)
- Counterfactual effect of Colombian protected areas on multispecies functional connectivity
- High Genetic Diversity of Phytophthora palmivora in Colombian Cacao: Evidence Against Geographic Barriers
- Causal inference in conservation policy: Evaluating the effects of Protected Areas on deforestation and well-being in the Peruvian Amazon
BibTeX
@article{charoud2026incentives,
title = {{Incentives are effective but insufficient to halt smallholder deforestation in the Colombian Amazon}},
author = {Hugo Charoud and Esteve Corbera and Lina Moros and Sébastien Costedoat and Santiago Izquierdo-Tort},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0340539},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340539},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Incentives are effective but insufficient to halt smallholder deforestation in the Colombian Amazon
AU - Hugo Charoud
AU - Esteve Corbera
AU - Lina Moros
AU - Sébastien Costedoat
AU - Santiago Izquierdo-Tort
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/23
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0340539
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340539
AB - In this article, we assess the impact of two Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) initiatives aimed at deterring deforestation in the department of Guaviare, Colombia. The initiatives are the government-led Incentivo Forestal Amazónico (IFA), which is part of the country’s REDD+ strategy, and the NGO-driven Caminemos–Territorios Sostenibles (CTS) project, which supported sustainable land-use activities over a four-year period. We find that, combined, these initiatives prevented approximately 1,400 hectares of forest loss, though they differed in their annualized impacts (2.9% versus 3.8%). We argue that this difference likely reflects variations in the type of incentives provided, their geographic focus, and their overarching goals. IFA focuses on larger, less threatened forest patches across a broader area, providing cash payments to landowners whilst laying the foundations for a long-term conservation and management approach. CTS, in contrast, targeted smaller patches at higher risk of deforestation along Guaviare’s agricultural frontier, offering targeted technical assistance and payments for a series of conservation and restoration commitments at farm level, including the adoption of silvopastoral practices. Considering these findings, we argue that distinct PES designs can play a complementary role in halting deforestation in the Colombian Amazon, and potentially in similar regions across tropical America. We call for more sustained and scaled-up efforts in sustainable land use and forest conservation for smallholders, while recognizing that such initiatives will remain insufficient unless scaling is accompanied by substantially stronger territorial state presence and governance in areas contested by armed groups, as well as comprehensive land-use policy reform.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -