Relational Generative Computing: From Rule–Relation–History Dynamics to Effective State Formation and Bidirectional Computational Execution
- 1Independent Researcher, Melbourne, Australia
Abstract
Conventional computation usually treats rules, relational structure, history and observation mappings as application-level data executed over a predefined machine state. We investigate a different computational abstraction in which rule, relation, information and retained history participate directly in the formation of computational state, persistent relational organizations may be promoted to reusable effective states only after explicit admission tests, and the same execution record supports both forward generation and reverse diagnosis. The framework distinguishes Relation from Information, instantaneous state from retained History, persistence from predictive closure, and successful forward output from mechanism-level identifiability. We define a role-relative effective-state admission vector containing persistence, prediction, intervention, history, recovery and causal-ancestry tests, and show why these criteria are non-compensatory. Four publication-safe controlled benchmarks illustrate the computational consequences: retained history improves prediction when present input is insufficient; admission prevents invalid coarse-state reuse while reducing unnecessary local updates; bidirectional traces improve localization of rule-, relation- and history-class faults relative to forward-output inspection; and versioned rule activation reduces persistent corruption compared with silent runtime mutation. These experiments are synthetic and do not establish a new physical ontology or hardware advantage. They support the narrower claim that relational, historical and admission-aware state semantics can define a falsifiable computing framework for sparse multiscale simulation and auditable scientific computation. Patent-protected production runtime, instruction-set, compiler, trust-domain and hardware-mapping details are not disclosed.
Related
- Architecting Anisotropic Force‐Responsive Bidirectional High‐Contrast Three‐Color Fluorescence Switches via Effective Molecular Modulation for High‐Security Information Storage
- Computing Approximate Solutions of Inconsistent Max-Min Fuzzy Relational Equations by Mixed-Integer Programming
- Effective Existence Across Scales: Operator-Invariant Admission, History Transport and Bidirectional Recovery Closure
- Rethinking Giftedness in the Age of Generative AI: A Relational Epistemic Agency Model for Advanced Learners.
- Foundations of Anti-Mathematics and Family Mathematics: Involutions, Anti-Calculus, Generative Networks, and Relational Invariants
BibTeX
@misc{wang2026relational,
title = {{Relational Generative Computing: From Rule–Relation–History Dynamics to Effective State Formation and Bidirectional Computational Execution}},
author = {Yanghua Wang},
howpublished = {Zenodo},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23472437},
url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23472437},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Relational Generative Computing: From Rule–Relation–History Dynamics to Effective State Formation and Bidirectional Computational Execution
AU - Yanghua Wang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/19
PB - Zenodo
DO - 10.5281/zenodo.23472437
UR - https://zenodo.org/records/23472437
AB - Conventional computation usually treats rules, relational structure, history and observation mappings as application-level data executed over a predefined machine state. We investigate a different computational abstraction in which rule, relation, information and retained history participate directly in the formation of computational state, persistent relational organizations may be promoted to reusable effective states only after explicit admission tests, and the same execution record supports both forward generation and reverse diagnosis. The framework distinguishes Relation from Information, instantaneous state from retained History, persistence from predictive closure, and successful forward output from mechanism-level identifiability. We define a role-relative effective-state admission vector containing persistence, prediction, intervention, history, recovery and causal-ancestry tests, and show why these criteria are non-compensatory. Four publication-safe controlled benchmarks illustrate the computational consequences: retained history improves prediction when present input is insufficient; admission prevents invalid coarse-state reuse while reducing unnecessary local updates; bidirectional traces improve localization of rule-, relation- and history-class faults relative to forward-output inspection; and versioned rule activation reduces persistent corruption compared with silent runtime mutation. These experiments are synthetic and do not establish a new physical ontology or hardware advantage. They support the narrower claim that relational, historical and admission-aware state semantics can define a falsifiable computing framework for sparse multiscale simulation and auditable scientific computation. Patent-protected production runtime, instruction-set, compiler, trust-domain and hardware-mapping details are not disclosed.
ER -