Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
220,620 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Efficacy of non-invasive neuromodulation for chronic tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  1. 1Audiovestibular Medicine unit, ENT Department, Al-Azhar University, Assuit, Egypt

Abstract

Background: Chronic tinnitus affects approximately 14% of adults worldwide, with nearly 2% experiencing severe, persistent symptoms that impair daily functioning. Non-invasive neuromodulation techniques, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and acoustic or nerve stimulation, have emerged as potential therapies, yet their clinical effectiveness remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of neuromodulation for chronic tinnitus.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through September, 2025. Eligible studies were RCTs assessing non-invasive neuromodulation versus sham in adults with chronic tinnitus. The primary outcome was change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) scores. Secondary outcomes included the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), loudness measures, and anxiety and depression scales.

Results: A total of 32 trials comprising 1,561 participants were included. Neuromodulation significantly improved tinnitus severity at short-term, with a pooled THI reduction of − 6.96 points (95% CI − 10.67 to − 3.26). rTMS showed a significant benefit (MD − 4.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 7.36 to − 1.33), as did acoustic/nerve stimulation (MD − 8.70, 95% CI − 15.81 to − 1.60), whereas tDCS demonstrated a nonsignificant effect (MD − 9.14, p = 0.10). Benefits were most pronounced immediately post-treatment and at 1–3 months, with effects diminishing by 6 months (MD − 3.93, p = 0.06). Secondary outcomes showed no significant improvements in TFI, TQ, objective loudness, or mood scales. Subjective loudness on visual analogue scale (VAS) showed a small borderline improvement (standardized mean difference [SMD] − 0.38, 95% CI − 0.75 to 0.00).

Conclusion: Non-invasive neuromodulation provides modest, clinically meaningful short-term reduction in tinnitus severity, particularly with rTMS at dorsolateral prefrontal cortex area and acoustic/nerve stimulation. However, effects are inconsistent across modalities and decrease over time. Future studies should prioritize standardized protocols, optimized stimulation parameters, and personalized targeting to enhance therapeutic efficacy.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-026-10541-0.

Related

  1. Assessment of blinding in pharmacotherapy and noninvasive neuromodulation randomized controlled trials for neuropathic pain in adults
    Landon Montag, Nadia Soliman, Xavier Moisset +35
    PainPeer-reviewedLicence not statedNeuroscienceHAL
  2. Efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions and biofeedback for migraine management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chaimae Zahri-Haidar, Jose I. Recio-Rodriguez, Natalia Sanchez-Aguadero +4
    Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceGeneral medicineFrontiersCrossrefDOAJ
  3. Comparative efficacy and safety of systemic therapies for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Vasiliki Pikoula, Efterpi Zafiriou, Anthony Bewley +12
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0ImmunologyFrontiersCrossref
  4. Comparative efficacy of brain-computer interface training with different feedback modalities for post-stroke upper-limb motor recovery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Fuqiang Wang, Xiao Lu, Yunhong Deng +7
    Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  5. Cutaneous efficacy and glucocorticoid-sparing effects of anifrolumab in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Jianing Wang, Feiyin Liu, Qianwen Lou +2
    Frontiers in immunologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textImmunologyEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{elmoursy2026efficacy,
  title = {{Efficacy of non-invasive neuromodulation for chronic tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials}},
  author = {Mohamed Mohamed Elmoursy and Waleed Mohammed Nemr Mohamed},
  journal = {European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1007/s00405-026-10541-0},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-026-10541-0},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Efficacy of non-invasive neuromodulation for chronic tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
AU  - Mohamed Mohamed Elmoursy
AU  - Waleed Mohammed Nemr Mohamed
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/20
JO  - European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
DO  - 10.1007/s00405-026-10541-0
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-026-10541-0
AB  - Background: Chronic tinnitus affects approximately 14% of adults worldwide, with nearly 2% experiencing severe, persistent symptoms that impair daily functioning. Non-invasive neuromodulation techniques, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and acoustic or nerve stimulation, have emerged as potential therapies, yet their clinical effectiveness remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of neuromodulation for chronic tinnitus.  Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through September, 2025. Eligible studies were RCTs assessing non-invasive neuromodulation versus sham in adults with chronic tinnitus. The primary outcome was change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) scores. Secondary outcomes included the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), loudness measures, and anxiety and depression scales.  Results: A total of 32 trials comprising 1,561 participants were included. Neuromodulation significantly improved tinnitus severity at short-term, with a pooled THI reduction of − 6.96 points (95% CI − 10.67 to − 3.26). rTMS showed a significant benefit (MD − 4.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 7.36 to − 1.33), as did acoustic/nerve stimulation (MD − 8.70, 95% CI − 15.81 to − 1.60), whereas tDCS demonstrated a nonsignificant effect (MD − 9.14, p = 0.10). Benefits were most pronounced immediately post-treatment and at 1–3 months, with effects diminishing by 6 months (MD − 3.93, p = 0.06). Secondary outcomes showed no significant improvements in TFI, TQ, objective loudness, or mood scales. Subjective loudness on visual analogue scale (VAS) showed a small borderline improvement (standardized mean difference [SMD] − 0.38, 95% CI − 0.75 to 0.00).  Conclusion: Non-invasive neuromodulation provides modest, clinically meaningful short-term reduction in tinnitus severity, particularly with rTMS at dorsolateral prefrontal cortex area and acoustic/nerve stimulation. However, effects are inconsistent across modalities and decrease over time. Future studies should prioritize standardized protocols, optimized stimulation parameters, and personalized targeting to enhance therapeutic efficacy.  Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-026-10541-0.
SN  - 0937-4477
SN  - 1434-4726
ER  -