Psychological mechanisms of perceived technological dependence on generative artificial intelligence tools: perceived knowledge, trust, anxiety, and self-efficacy.
- 1Interaction Design Lab, Graduate School of Techno Design, Kookmin University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- 2Anhui Institute of International Business, Hefei, Anhui, China.
- 3Anhui Vocational College of Press and Publishing, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Abstract
Generative AI tools are increasingly used in design education, yet the relationship between students' perceptions of these tools and their reported reliance on them remains unclear. This study analyzed cross-sectional survey responses from 526 undergraduate students in design-related disciplines using partial least squares structural equation modeling. In the specified model, perceived reliability, perceived usefulness, and perceived intelligence were positively associated with perceived AIGC knowledge, whereas perceived ease of use was not significantly associated with it. Perceived AIGC knowledge was positively associated with trust, self-efficacy, and usage intention and negatively associated with AIGC-related anxiety. Trust, AIGC-related anxiety, and self-efficacy each showed a significant indirect effect in the modeled relationship between perceived AIGC knowledge and usage intention. Usage intention was strongly associated with perceived technological dependence. These findings are consistent with the proposed framework, but the cross-sectional data do not establish the temporal sequence of the constructs or show that reported dependence reflects harmful overuse. The study extends technology acceptance research by examining perceived reliance in AIGC-supported creative work.
Related
- Engagement in AI-Mediated Informal Digital Learning of English: An Adaptive Intelligence Perspective on Motivational, Psychological, and Technological Resources
- Psychological correlates of dependence on generative and conversational AI: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- How policy and technological path dependence shape energy-system futures in ScenarioMIP-CMIP7
- Perceived AI-Related Risks of Technological Dependence in Healthcare Among Nurses in Poland
- Association pathways between AI training recommendation dependence and athletes’ psychological characteristics related to autonomous judgment
BibTeX
@article{wei2026psychological,
title = {{Psychological mechanisms of perceived technological dependence on generative artificial intelligence tools: perceived knowledge, trust, anxiety, and self-efficacy.}},
author = {Le Wei and Shu Zhang and Junghyun Heo},
journal = {Frontiers in psychology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1928967},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42996264},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Psychological mechanisms of perceived technological dependence on generative artificial intelligence tools: perceived knowledge, trust, anxiety, and self-efficacy.
AU - Le Wei
AU - Shu Zhang
AU - Junghyun Heo
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
JO - Frontiers in psychology
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1928967
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42996264
AB - Generative AI tools are increasingly used in design education, yet the relationship between students' perceptions of these tools and their reported reliance on them remains unclear. This study analyzed cross-sectional survey responses from 526 undergraduate students in design-related disciplines using partial least squares structural equation modeling. In the specified model, perceived reliability, perceived usefulness, and perceived intelligence were positively associated with perceived AIGC knowledge, whereas perceived ease of use was not significantly associated with it. Perceived AIGC knowledge was positively associated with trust, self-efficacy, and usage intention and negatively associated with AIGC-related anxiety. Trust, AIGC-related anxiety, and self-efficacy each showed a significant indirect effect in the modeled relationship between perceived AIGC knowledge and usage intention. Usage intention was strongly associated with perceived technological dependence. These findings are consistent with the proposed framework, but the cross-sectional data do not establish the temporal sequence of the constructs or show that reported dependence reflects harmful overuse. The study extends technology acceptance research by examining perceived reliance in AIGC-supported creative work.
SN - 1664-1078
ER -