Solitude as Short-Term Regulation: An Allostatic View of Withdrawal in Times of Distress
Abstract
Humans are social, yet during moments of distress, brief time alone helps recovery. We ran two ecological momentary assessment studies – with adult (N=110; 6 prompts/day for 7 days) and preregistered adolescent sample (N=69; 6 prompts/day for 10 days). General negative experiences (negative emotions, worsened mood) predicted higher odds of preferring solitude, and so did social experiences (loneliness, high social load). Preference for solitude under distress emerged despite whether the person was with others or alone, so it is not just about wanting to get out of unpleasant social encounters. In adolescents, while such desire for solitude is generally avoidance-driven, those prone to social stress also preferred this time for regulatory aims – rest, autonomy, and reflection. Overall, the patterns support an allostatic view: the everyday desire for time alone is to help manage demand, not merely to escape; it highlights moments when withdrawing, rather than seeking more socialization, may be preferable.
Related
- Adaptive Precision Nutrition: Integrating Dynamic Phenotyping, Multi-Omics, Artificial Intelligence, and the Allostatic Viability Principle
- Associations between allostatic load and osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study from NHANES 1999-2020
- Attachment and Caregiving as Social Allostatic Inference: An Updated Social Neuroscience Account from Single Brains to Dyads
- Impact of environmental enrichment and allostatic load induced by repeated mixing on the transcriptome of three porcine brain tissues
- Morphine causes distinct changes in the lipidome throughout the brain and body after acute or chronic administration: implications for novel endogenous lipid signaling systems involved in opioid reward and withdrawal
BibTeX
@misc{nguyen2026solitude,
title = {{Solitude as Short-Term Regulation: An Allostatic View of Withdrawal in Times of Distress}},
author = {Thuy-vy Nguyen},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/8sbpu_v2},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/8sbpu_v2/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Solitude as Short-Term Regulation: An Allostatic View of Withdrawal in Times of Distress
AU - Thuy-vy Nguyen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/20
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/8sbpu_v2
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/8sbpu_v2/
AB - Humans are social, yet during moments of distress, brief time alone helps recovery. We ran two ecological momentary assessment studies – with adult (N=110; 6 prompts/day for 7 days) and preregistered adolescent sample (N=69; 6 prompts/day for 10 days). General negative experiences (negative emotions, worsened mood) predicted higher odds of preferring solitude, and so did social experiences (loneliness, high social load). Preference for solitude under distress emerged despite whether the person was with others or alone, so it is not just about wanting to get out of unpleasant social encounters. In adolescents, while such desire for solitude is generally avoidance-driven, those prone to social stress also preferred this time for regulatory aims – rest, autonomy, and reflection. Overall, the patterns support an allostatic view: the everyday desire for time alone is to help manage demand, not merely to escape; it highlights moments when withdrawing, rather than seeking more socialization, may be preferable.
ER -