Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,220 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCDrug design, development and therapy

Opioid-Free versus Opioid-Based Anesthesia for Quality of Recovery After Knee Arthroscopy: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
  2. 2Graduate School, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
  3. 3Department of Anesthesiology, Wenzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
  4. 4Department of Pain, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
  5. 5Oujiang Laboratory, Zhejiang Laboratory for Regenerative Medicine, Vision and Brain Health, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

We determined whether dexmedetomidine- and esketamine-based opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) was non-inferior to opioid-based anesthesia (OA) for 24-hour Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) after elective knee arthroscopy with femoral nerve block. In this patient- and assessor-blinded randomized trial, 70 adults undergoing knee arthroscopy with femoral nerve block were allocated to OFA or OA. The primary outcome was 24-hour QoR-15 (non-inferiority margin, -6 points). Secondary outcomes included pain, rescue analgesia, and adverse events. The primary modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis included 66 randomized participants with an assessable 24-hour QoR-15 score (33 per group). Mean 24-hour QoR-15 scores were 126.7 ± 6.4 with OFA and 125.3 ± 6.1 with OA (mean difference 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.60 to 4.51), establishing non-inferiority but not superiority. OFA increased rescue opioid requirements (Hodges-Lehmann estimate 10 mg oral morphine equivalents, 95% CI 0 to 10; p=0.037), shortened time to rescue analgesia (hazard ratio 2.11, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.92; p=0.018), and increased early pain. OFA reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (21.2% vs 48.5%; relative risk 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.92; p=0.038). Two postoperative bradycardia events occurred with OFA. In adults undergoing elective knee arthroscopy with femoral nerve block, dexmedetomidine- and esketamine-based OFA was non-inferior to OA for 24-hour QoR-15. OFA was associated with lower postoperative nausea and vomiting, but higher early pain and an earlier need for rescue analgesia. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2400084207; registered 13 May 2024, before enrollment. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=230255.

Related

  1. Quality of recovery after arthroscopic meniscectomy with remimazolam or propofol anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial
    Eunah Cho, Ha Yan Kim, Yangjin Kim +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPLOS
  2. Combined regional anesthesia versus general anesthesia for elective shoulder arthroscopy: a prospective randomized trial of postoperative pain, with an exploratory cost analysis.
    Atakan Sezgi, Musa Zengin, Mehmet Faruk Çatma +7
    BMC surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  3. Cumulative Intraoperative Hypotension Burden as a Predictor of Early Quality of Recovery Following General Anesthesia: A Prospective Observational Study
    Velimala Swaroopa, Bingi Swathi
    Journal of Medicine, Pharmacology and Medical Devises TechnologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJDOAJ
  4. Efficacy of intravenous lipid emulsion in enhancing the recovery of spinal anesthesia: An exploratory double-blinded, randomized controlled study.
    Karthikeyan Suresh Kumar, Praveen Talawar, Bhavna Gupta +6
    Saudi journal of anaesthesiaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  5. The impact of intraoperative use of the inhaled anesthetic desflurane on postoperative recovery quality after noncardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Anhong Li, Yuanxin Liu, Jinfei Huang +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
BibTeX
@article{huang2026opioidfree,
  title = {{Opioid-Free versus Opioid-Based Anesthesia for Quality of Recovery After Knee Arthroscopy: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.}},
  author = {Lvdan Huang and Yu Lan and Wangao Li and Xiaona Zhu and Wujun Geng and Kejian Shi},
  journal = {Drug design, development and therapy},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.2147/dddt.s644051},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953556},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Opioid-Free versus Opioid-Based Anesthesia for Quality of Recovery After Knee Arthroscopy: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.
AU  - Lvdan Huang
AU  - Yu Lan
AU  - Wangao Li
AU  - Xiaona Zhu
AU  - Wujun Geng
AU  - Kejian Shi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Drug design, development and therapy
DO  - 10.2147/dddt.s644051
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953556
AB  - We determined whether dexmedetomidine- and esketamine-based opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) was non-inferior to opioid-based anesthesia (OA) for 24-hour Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) after elective knee arthroscopy with femoral nerve block. In this patient- and assessor-blinded randomized trial, 70 adults undergoing knee arthroscopy with femoral nerve block were allocated to OFA or OA. The primary outcome was 24-hour QoR-15 (non-inferiority margin, -6 points). Secondary outcomes included pain, rescue analgesia, and adverse events. The primary modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis included 66 randomized participants with an assessable 24-hour QoR-15 score (33 per group). Mean 24-hour QoR-15 scores were 126.7 ± 6.4 with OFA and 125.3 ± 6.1 with OA (mean difference 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.60 to 4.51), establishing non-inferiority but not superiority. OFA increased rescue opioid requirements (Hodges-Lehmann estimate 10 mg oral morphine equivalents, 95% CI 0 to 10; p=0.037), shortened time to rescue analgesia (hazard ratio 2.11, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.92; p=0.018), and increased early pain. OFA reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (21.2% vs 48.5%; relative risk 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.92; p=0.038). Two postoperative bradycardia events occurred with OFA. In adults undergoing elective knee arthroscopy with femoral nerve block, dexmedetomidine- and esketamine-based OFA was non-inferior to OA for 24-hour QoR-15. OFA was associated with lower postoperative nausea and vomiting, but higher early pain and an earlier need for rescue analgesia. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2400084207; registered 13 May 2024, before enrollment. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=230255.
SN  - 1177-8881
ER  -