Restoration of quality of life following secondary velopharyngeal insufficiency surgery: a VELO-informed study with reference to velopharyngeal competence
- 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zhenjiang Stomatological Hospital, NO.81 Yunhe Road, Jiangsu Province Zhenjiang, 212003 China
- 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Ibb University, Ibb, Yemen
- 3Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan China
Abstract
Background: Residual velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after primary cleft palate repair continues to impair speech, psychosocial functioning, and overall quality of life (QOL). Although VPI surgery is a standard intervention, further evidence is needed regarding its impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and the clinical factors associated with postoperative quality-of-life improvement. This study evaluated changes in VPI-related QOL before and after secondary VPI surgery using the validated Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Effects on Life Outcomes (VELO) instrument, contextualized these findings using a reference group with velopharyngeal competence (VPC), and identified key clinical determinants of postoperative QOL.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 170 participants, including 85 patients with residual VPI undergoing secondary palatoplasty and 85 participants with established VPC. Certified cleft specialists assessed speech and functional outcomes, while QOL was measured using the validated Chinese version of the VELO instrument. Postoperative speech and VELO assessments were conducted at a mean follow-up of 5.7 ± 4.0 years after surgery. Statistical analyses included Chi-square, Wilcoxon rank, and Mann–Whitney U tests; multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of inadequate postoperative QOL.
Results: At baseline, VPI patients demonstrated significantly poorer speech performance, higher oronasal fistula (ONF) rates, and lower VELO scores than the reference group (all P < 0.001). Following surgery, ONF rates declined from 27.1% to 5.9%, 63.5% achieved normal speech, and 71.8% attained competent velopharyngeal closure (P < 0.001). VELO total scores improved markedly from 53.4 ± 15.7 to 87.3 ± 9.0, showing substantial improvement and moving closer to the range observed in the reference group (91.4 ± 7.2). Domain-level analyses revealed broad functional and psychosocial recovery, particularly in situational and emotional impact domains. Speech intelligibility deficiency and ONF were significantly associated with poor postoperative QOL, while residual VPI showed a weaker association.
Conclusions: Secondary VPI surgery yields substantial improvements in both functional and patient-reported outcomes. Marked gains in postoperative VELO scores highlight the procedure’s role in improving VPI-related quality of life and psychosocial functioning. Speech intelligibility deficiency and ONF status were the strongest factors associated with postoperative QOL, highlighting the importance of optimizing functional speech outcomes and integrating PROM-informed cleft care.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09050-7.
Related
- Restoration pathways reshape forest structure and multifunctionality in subtropical plantations and secondary forests
- Tryptophan Restores Recovery Competence Following Starvation in the Absence of Lysosomal Amino Acid Sensing
- Comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals conserved injury responses and divergent molecular responses underlying early regenerative competence following traumatic brain injury
- Case Report: Successful treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis with concomitant renal insufficiency using spesolimab: a report of two cases
- Serum Bile Acid Concentrations in Dogs with Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency
BibTeX
@article{sakran2026restoration,
title = {{Restoration of quality of life following secondary velopharyngeal insufficiency surgery: a VELO-informed study with reference to velopharyngeal competence}},
author = {Karim Ahmed Sakran and Qihang Chen and Zongsheng Xu and Remsh Khaled Al-Rokhami and Hanyao Huang and Bing Shi and Xiaobao Dang},
journal = {BMC Oral Health},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12903-026-09050-7},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09050-7},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Restoration of quality of life following secondary velopharyngeal insufficiency surgery: a VELO-informed study with reference to velopharyngeal competence
AU - Karim Ahmed Sakran
AU - Qihang Chen
AU - Zongsheng Xu
AU - Remsh Khaled Al-Rokhami
AU - Hanyao Huang
AU - Bing Shi
AU - Xiaobao Dang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/30
JO - BMC Oral Health
DO - 10.1186/s12903-026-09050-7
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09050-7
AB - Background: Residual velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after primary cleft palate repair continues to impair speech, psychosocial functioning, and overall quality of life (QOL). Although VPI surgery is a standard intervention, further evidence is needed regarding its impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and the clinical factors associated with postoperative quality-of-life improvement. This study evaluated changes in VPI-related QOL before and after secondary VPI surgery using the validated Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Effects on Life Outcomes (VELO) instrument, contextualized these findings using a reference group with velopharyngeal competence (VPC), and identified key clinical determinants of postoperative QOL. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 170 participants, including 85 patients with residual VPI undergoing secondary palatoplasty and 85 participants with established VPC. Certified cleft specialists assessed speech and functional outcomes, while QOL was measured using the validated Chinese version of the VELO instrument. Postoperative speech and VELO assessments were conducted at a mean follow-up of 5.7 ± 4.0 years after surgery. Statistical analyses included Chi-square, Wilcoxon rank, and Mann–Whitney U tests; multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of inadequate postoperative QOL. Results: At baseline, VPI patients demonstrated significantly poorer speech performance, higher oronasal fistula (ONF) rates, and lower VELO scores than the reference group (all P < 0.001). Following surgery, ONF rates declined from 27.1% to 5.9%, 63.5% achieved normal speech, and 71.8% attained competent velopharyngeal closure (P < 0.001). VELO total scores improved markedly from 53.4 ± 15.7 to 87.3 ± 9.0, showing substantial improvement and moving closer to the range observed in the reference group (91.4 ± 7.2). Domain-level analyses revealed broad functional and psychosocial recovery, particularly in situational and emotional impact domains. Speech intelligibility deficiency and ONF were significantly associated with poor postoperative QOL, while residual VPI showed a weaker association. Conclusions: Secondary VPI surgery yields substantial improvements in both functional and patient-reported outcomes. Marked gains in postoperative VELO scores highlight the procedure’s role in improving VPI-related quality of life and psychosocial functioning. Speech intelligibility deficiency and ONF status were the strongest factors associated with postoperative QOL, highlighting the importance of optimizing functional speech outcomes and integrating PROM-informed cleft care. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09050-7.
SN - 1472-6831
ER -