Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

PRESCCO: Efficient Prediction Intervals under a Right-Censored Covariate

Abstract

In clinical studies, a patient's outcome, e.g., a cognitive test score, is typical or atypical depending on how it compares with the outcomes of patients at a similar point in a neurodegenerative disease, measured by how far they are from a common disease event. A prediction interval based on the time to that event provides that comparison, but that time is right-censored for most patients. Yet no method had computed such a prediction interval in this right-censored covariate setting. We first adapt three conformal prediction methods to this setting, and show that the estimated half-length, the distance the interval runs either side of its center, varies from one study to the next, so the same outcome can be judged typical in one study and atypical in another. We then develop the PRESCCO method, whose estimator of the half-length is semiparametrically efficient and doubly robust, staying consistent when one of its two models is misspecified, while the method loses no coverage. In simulations its standard deviation is four to thirty times smaller than under any conformal prediction method, and in a Huntington disease study with 77.2% right-censoring, an outcome typical in one study is no longer atypical in another.

Related

  1. Efficient conformal prediction intervals for time series: Online PID-Expert aggregation
    Guodong Liu, Yanfei Kang, Ren Miao +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Generalized confidence intervals for the covariate-specific overlap coefficient
    Alba Alcaraz-Peñalba, Alba María Franco-Pereira, María del Carmen Pardo
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Automated, Efficient, and Model-Free Inference for Randomized Clinical Trials via Data-Driven Covariate Adjustment
    Kelly Van Lancker, Ivan Matos Diaz, Stijn Vansteelandt
    The American StatisticianPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text15 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  4. Efficient Gaussian Process Modeling for Large Replicated and Censored Data in Industrial Research
    Ying Zhang, Emily L. Kang, Shuo Li
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. SurvFM enables tabular foundation models for right-censored survival prediction
    Yue Lyu, Steven H. Lin, Xuelin Huang +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{han2026prescco,
  title = {{PRESCCO: Efficient Prediction Intervals under a Right-Censored Covariate}},
  author = {Kihyun Han and Yanyuan Ma and Karen Marder and Tanya P. Garcia},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2607.26982},
  eprint = {2607.26982},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.26982},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - PRESCCO: Efficient Prediction Intervals under a Right-Censored Covariate
AU  - Kihyun Han
AU  - Yanyuan Ma
AU  - Karen Marder
AU  - Tanya P. Garcia
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/04
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2607.26982
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.26982
AB  - In clinical studies, a patient's outcome, e.g., a cognitive test score, is typical or atypical depending on how it compares with the outcomes of patients at a similar point in a neurodegenerative disease, measured by how far they are from a common disease event. A prediction interval based on the time to that event provides that comparison, but that time is right-censored for most patients. Yet no method had computed such a prediction interval in this right-censored covariate setting. We first adapt three conformal prediction methods to this setting, and show that the estimated half-length, the distance the interval runs either side of its center, varies from one study to the next, so the same outcome can be judged typical in one study and atypical in another. We then develop the PRESCCO method, whose estimator of the half-length is semiparametrically efficient and doubly robust, staying consistent when one of its two models is misspecified, while the method loses no coverage. In simulations its standard deviation is four to thirty times smaller than under any conformal prediction method, and in a Huntington disease study with 77.2% right-censoring, an outcome typical in one study is no longer atypical in another.
ER  -