Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPhysics and imaging in radiation oncology

Benchmarking intermediate dose spillage in single target stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases.

4 more authors
5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn, Germany.
  2. 2University Clinic for Medical Radiation Physics, Medical Campus Pius Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.
  3. 3Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  4. 4Department of Radiation Physics, University Hospital Leipzig, Stephanstrasse 9a, Leipzig, Germany.
  5. 5Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Abstract

Background and purpose

Intermediate-dose spillage is central to normal-brain sparing in stereotactic radiosurgery, yet fixed adverse-event and relative indices do not define achievable plan quality for single-target linear accelerator treatments. The aim was to derive a volume-dependent absolute benchmark for the 50% prescription isodose volume (V50%; equivalent to V10 Gy for 20 Gy plans) for brain metastases.Materials and methods

In total, 276 single-isocenter single-target plans were analyzed: 178 idealized model plans and 98 clinical plans. Power-law regression in log-log space modeled spillage against planning target volume (PTV, cm³). The volume-scaling exponents were 0.83 for the ideal references and 0.75 for the simplified clinical threshold. The clinical upper threshold was derived using q = 0.90 quantile regression. Threshold-exceeding plans were reviewed for anatomical or technical justification.Results

In the model cohort V50% value correlated strongly with PTV (r = 0.994, p < 0.001). The ideal mean model was V50% = 3.71 × PTV0.83, the conservative ideal-planning reference was V50% = 4.10 × PTV0.83, and the clinical upper threshold was V50% = 5.00 × PTV0.75. Ten of 98 clinical plans (10%) exceeded the threshold. Seven lacked anatomical justification and were replanned, reducing V50% by a median of 14% (range 7-29%) without compromising target coverage.Conclusions

A volume-based V50% benchmark provided a complementary quality-assurance reference for single-target linear accelerator radiosurgery for brain metastases. It flagged plans that warranted structured review alongside target coverage, organs of interest, conformity, and gradient metrics.

Related

  1. Stereotactic radiosurgery plan optimization with a human-in-the-loop reasoning large language model agent
    Humza Nusrat, Luke Francisco, Bing Luo +10
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationCrossref
  2. Comparative Analysis of Commercial Independent Dose Calculation Systems for Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery
    Michael D. Lowe, Jack C. Nelson, Joe Caron +4
    Journal of Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textApplied physics & instrumentationDOAJ
  3. Retrospective intrafraction motion verification using triggered kilovoltage images during bone metastases stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Quentin Techer, Noé Grandgirard, Saturnin Sandjong +2
    Physics and Imaging in Radiation OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSystems & synthetic biologyMedical imaging & radiologyHAL
  4. Dosimetric Comparison of Contemporary Stereotactic Radiotherapy Platforms for Brain Metastases: Towards Personalized Technology Selection
    Wenyue Duan, Zhe Wang, Ruoyu Wang
    Technology in Cancer Research & TreatmentPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationPMC
  5. Clinical application of MR-Only in cyberknife stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: a feasibility study
    Yajuan Wang, Zhongming Yin, LiMing Sheng +6
    Radiation Oncology (London, England)Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationPMC
BibTeX
@article{nour2026benchmarking,
  title = {{Benchmarking intermediate dose spillage in single target stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases.}},
  author = {Youness Nour and Shari Wiegreffe and Tuba Tekin and Lara Caglayan and Christina Leitzen and Cas S Dejonckheere and Davide Scafa and Julian P Layer and Victoria Volkenborn and Fabian Kugel and Stephan Garbe and Christos Moustakis and Dimos Baltas and Gustavo R Sarria and Anca-L Grosu and Eleni Gkika},
  journal = {Physics and imaging in radiation oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1016/j.phro.2026.101105},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42904134},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Benchmarking intermediate dose spillage in single target stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases.
AU  - Youness Nour
AU  - Shari Wiegreffe
AU  - Tuba Tekin
AU  - Lara Caglayan
AU  - Christina Leitzen
AU  - Cas S Dejonckheere
AU  - Davide Scafa
AU  - Julian P Layer
AU  - Victoria Volkenborn
AU  - Fabian Kugel
AU  - Stephan Garbe
AU  - Christos Moustakis
AU  - Dimos Baltas
AU  - Gustavo R Sarria
AU  - Anca-L Grosu
AU  - Eleni Gkika
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
JO  - Physics and imaging in radiation oncology
DO  - 10.1016/j.phro.2026.101105
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42904134
AB  - Background and purpose  Intermediate-dose spillage is central to normal-brain sparing in stereotactic radiosurgery, yet fixed adverse-event and relative indices do not define achievable plan quality for single-target linear accelerator treatments. The aim was to derive a volume-dependent absolute benchmark for the 50% prescription isodose volume (V50%; equivalent to V10 Gy for 20 Gy plans) for brain metastases.Materials and methods  In total, 276 single-isocenter single-target plans were analyzed: 178 idealized model plans and 98 clinical plans. Power-law regression in log-log space modeled spillage against planning target volume (PTV, cm³). The volume-scaling exponents were 0.83 for the ideal references and 0.75 for the simplified clinical threshold. The clinical upper threshold was derived using q = 0.90 quantile regression. Threshold-exceeding plans were reviewed for anatomical or technical justification.Results  In the model cohort V50% value correlated strongly with PTV (r = 0.994, p < 0.001). The ideal mean model was V50% = 3.71 × PTV0.83, the conservative ideal-planning reference was V50% = 4.10 × PTV0.83, and the clinical upper threshold was V50% = 5.00 × PTV0.75. Ten of 98 clinical plans (10%) exceeded the threshold. Seven lacked anatomical justification and were replanned, reducing V50% by a median of 14% (range 7-29%) without compromising target coverage.Conclusions  A volume-based V50% benchmark provided a complementary quality-assurance reference for single-target linear accelerator radiosurgery for brain metastases. It flagged plans that warranted structured review alongside target coverage, organs of interest, conformity, and gradient metrics.
SN  - 2405-6316
ER  -