Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 30 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDPsikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar

Development and Validation of a New Self-Care Scale: Self-Care Assessment for Employees (SAFE)

  1. 1YÜKSEK İHTİSAS ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  2. 2SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, GÜLHANE TIP FAKÜLTESİ, GÜLHANE TIP PR. (ANKARA)
  3. 3T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop and psychometrically validate the Self-Care Assessment for Employees (SAFE), a multidimensional instrument assessing physical, psychosocial, occupational, and mental self-care. Method: A total of 979 healthcare professionals completed an online survey. After excluding 11 responses due to random response patterns, 968 participants were included in the analyses and randomly divided into two subsamples for exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n =484) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n =484). Results: The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin value was .927, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was significant, indicating sampling adequacy. EFA revealed a four-factor structure explaining 51.52% of the total variance. During CFA, one item with a standardized loading below .40 was removed, resulting in a final 23-item scale. The four-factor model demonstrated acceptable fit (χ²/df = 2.86, CFI = .918, TLI = .906, RMSEA = .062). Standardized factor loadings ranged from .51 to .79. Composite reliability values exceeded .70 for all factors, and convergent and discriminant validity were generally supported. Conclusion: The SAFE demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and provides a comprehensive framework for assessing multidimensional self-care and motivational readiness among employees.

Related

  1. Socioeconomic status assessment in Lebanese primary health care centers: development and validation of the SES-PHC scale
    Lina Traboulsi, Hala Sacre, Fatima Wehbi +12
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  2. Introducing the Self-Other Distinction Difficulties Questionnaire (SODDQ): Scale Development and Validation in a US Sample
    Henryk Bukowski, Ekaterina Pronizius, Alix Bigot +6
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  3. Development and initial validation of the eating disorder-related rumination assessment scale in a Turkish non-clinical sample
    Dilan Gulacan, Caner Doğrusever, Sevgi Bektas-Dag +1
    BMC PsychologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  4. Rapid Assessment of Therapeutic Empathy (RATE): Development of a universal single-item empathy scale and validation of the patient-reported version
    Amber Bennett-Weston, John Maltby, Kamlesh Khunti +5
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceClinical trials & evidence synthesisPLOS
  5. Development and psychometric validation of a multidimensional menstrual hygiene scale
    Ayşe Aydın, Fatma Ocakoğlu, Meltem Şirin Gök +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{alatas2026development,
  title = {{Development and Validation of a New Self-Care Scale: Self-Care Assessment for Employees (SAFE)}},
  author = {Esra Alataş and Fatih Yığman and Semra Ulusoy Kaymak and Emre Üstdağ and Fatmagül Ertuğrul},
  journal = {Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.18863/pgy.1834947},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1834947},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Development and Validation of a New Self-Care Scale: Self-Care Assessment for Employees (SAFE)
AU  - Esra Alataş
AU  - Fatih Yığman
AU  - Semra Ulusoy Kaymak
AU  - Emre Üstdağ
AU  - Fatmagül Ertuğrul
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
JO  - Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar
DO  - 10.18863/pgy.1834947
UR  - https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1834947
AB  - Objective: This study aimed to develop and psychometrically validate the Self-Care Assessment for Employees (SAFE), a multidimensional instrument assessing physical, psychosocial, occupational, and mental self-care. Method: A total of 979 healthcare professionals completed an online survey. After excluding 11 responses due to random response patterns, 968 participants were included in the analyses and randomly divided into two subsamples for exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n =484) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n =484). Results: The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin value was .927, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was significant, indicating sampling adequacy. EFA revealed a four-factor structure explaining 51.52% of the total variance. During CFA, one item with a standardized loading below .40 was removed, resulting in a final 23-item scale. The four-factor model demonstrated acceptable fit (χ²/df = 2.86, CFI = .918, TLI = .906, RMSEA = .062). Standardized factor loadings ranged from .51 to .79. Composite reliability values exceeded .70 for all factors, and convergent and discriminant validity were generally supported. Conclusion: The SAFE demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and provides a comprehensive framework for assessing multidimensional self-care and motivational readiness among employees.
SN  - 1309-0674
SN  - 1309-0658
ER  -