Designing spatial capture recapture surveys for multiple populations
- 1University of Cape Town
Abstract
Recent work on the design of spatial capture-recapture (SCR) studies has largely focused on settings with a single set of movement and detection parameters. In many applied contexts, however, populations are naturally stratified-for example, when different sexes exhibit markedly different movement scales and encounter processes, or when more than one focal species is monitored. Designs that perform well for one group may be inefficient or suboptimal for others, despite the substantial logistical effort typically required to implement an SCR survey. We describe several potential SCR design strategies for surveying multiple groups, and compare these using simulation. Designs considered include regular and optimised grids, clustered and lacework designs, and designs generated using genetic algorithms, including new approaches that optimise information from both groups and a recently published two-stage design. Using proximity detectors such as camera traps, we evaluate design performance in terms of precision, bias, and coverage, and examine how performance changes with the number of available resources. Our results show that multi-group SCR surveys can perform well even when focal groups differ greatly in movement scale and encounter rate, provided that some simple guidelines are followed. Systematic layouts accommodating more than one characteristic spacing e.g. cluster designs, performed consistently well and are a reliable default option. Regular grid designs with a single spacing between detectors are feasible when differences between groups are moderate but performed poorly as differences increased. Establishing when these designs become problematic adds unnecessary risk to the design process. Algorithmic designs did not outperform systematic designs even in highly-skewed scenarios expected to favour them. In practice, when there is more than one focal group we recommend identifying the smallest and largest plausible movement scales and rejecting potentially pathological designs, primarily those that cannot generate recaptures at the smaller scale or cover a substantial area at the larger scale.
Related
- Rationalizing the application of spatial capture-recapture versus space-to-event models for monitoring populations of an endangered social carnivore
- A non‐Euclidean movement model to quantify landscape connectivity with open spatial capture–recapture models
- Carnivores in a metropolitan forest island: first spatial capture-recapture estimates reveal high densities of leopards and striped hyenas in Jaipur, India
- From video to encounter histories: individual identification and machine vision for salmonid capture-recapture monitoring
- Year-round spatial segregation and fisheries overlap of white-chinned petrels from multiple populations at South Georgia
BibTeX
@misc{distiller2026designing,
title = {{Designing spatial capture recapture surveys for multiple populations}},
author = {G. Distiller and I. Durbach},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.22.753485},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.22.753485v1},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Designing spatial capture recapture surveys for multiple populations
AU - G. Distiller
AU - I. Durbach
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/22
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.22.753485
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.22.753485v1
AB - Recent work on the design of spatial capture-recapture (SCR) studies has largely focused on settings with a single set of movement and detection parameters. In many applied contexts, however, populations are naturally stratified-for example, when different sexes exhibit markedly different movement scales and encounter processes, or when more than one focal species is monitored. Designs that perform well for one group may be inefficient or suboptimal for others, despite the substantial logistical effort typically required to implement an SCR survey. We describe several potential SCR design strategies for surveying multiple groups, and compare these using simulation. Designs considered include regular and optimised grids, clustered and lacework designs, and designs generated using genetic algorithms, including new approaches that optimise information from both groups and a recently published two-stage design. Using proximity detectors such as camera traps, we evaluate design performance in terms of precision, bias, and coverage, and examine how performance changes with the number of available resources. Our results show that multi-group SCR surveys can perform well even when focal groups differ greatly in movement scale and encounter rate, provided that some simple guidelines are followed. Systematic layouts accommodating more than one characteristic spacing e.g. cluster designs, performed consistently well and are a reliable default option. Regular grid designs with a single spacing between detectors are feasible when differences between groups are moderate but performed poorly as differences increased. Establishing when these designs become problematic adds unnecessary risk to the design process. Algorithmic designs did not outperform systematic designs even in highly-skewed scenarios expected to favour them. In practice, when there is more than one focal group we recommend identifying the smallest and largest plausible movement scales and rejecting potentially pathological designs, primarily those that cannot generate recaptures at the smaller scale or cover a substantial area at the larger scale.
ER -