Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,546 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Rationalizing the application of spatial capture-recapture versus space-to-event models for monitoring populations of an endangered social carnivore

  1. 1Nature Conservation Foundation

Abstract

Reliable estimates of population size are fundamental to understanding wildlife population status and informing conservation. Obtaining such estimates remains challenging for unmarked species, particularly in tropical countries where logistical and financial constraints limit intensive monitoring. The endangered dhole (Cuon alpinus), a highly social canid without natural markings, is one such species for which robust population estimates remain scarce. We estimated dhole density in the Valparai plateau, a human-dominated agroforest-forest mosaic in India's Western Ghats. We compared Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture (SECR) models based on individual identification from fecal DNA and Space-to-Event (STE) models based on camera-trap detections. We additionally applied both approaches to individually identifiable leopards (Panthera pardus) to cross-validate STE versus SECR estimates. SECR estimated dhole density at 22 individuals per 100 sq.km, with STE estimates varying substantially depending on how the camera viewshed area was defined. STE estimates based on post hoc viewshed measurements, particularly after reducing the viewshed by 10%, were comparable to SECR estimates. In contrast, STE underestimated leopard density relative to SECR (7 versus 12 per 100 sq.km), although uncertainty intervals overlapped. Ecologically, our results indicate that human-use agroforest mosaics can support dhole densities comparable to, or exceeding, those reported from several Protected Areas, highlighting their potential importance for dhole conservation. More broadly, we argue that STE models may offer a practical and relatively inexpensive approach for baseline monitoring of dholes from camera-trap surveys, but their reliability depends strongly on accurate characterization of the effective viewshed and may vary across species and landscapes.

Related

  1. Designing spatial capture recapture surveys for multiple populations
    G. Distiller, I. Durbach
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textEcologybioRxiv
  2. From video to encounter histories: individual identification and machine vision for salmonid capture-recapture monitoring
    K. Karlsson
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEcologybioRxiv
  3. Application of close‐kin mark–recapture to an American black bear population using harvest samples
    Anthony Sévêque, Robert C Lonsinger, Lisette P Waits +8
    Ecological ApplicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  4. Leveraging collaborations between researchers, wildlife managers and citizen-volunteers to monitor endangered carnivore populations across space and time
    A. Srivathsa, M. Shukla, P. Saravanan +3
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEcologybioRxiv
  5. Endangered mammal occurrence records from Environmental Impact Assessment and post-EIA monitoring in the Republic of Korea.
    Jungkwon Kim, Hae-Ran Kim, Minho Chang +1
    Biodiversity data journalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{ganguly2026rationalizing,
  title = {{Rationalizing the application of spatial capture-recapture versus space-to-event models for monitoring populations of an endangered social carnivore}},
  author = {D. Ganguly and A. D. Sharma and U. Ramakrishnan and A. Srivathsa},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.25.754339},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.25.754339v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Rationalizing the application of spatial capture-recapture versus space-to-event models for monitoring populations of an endangered social carnivore
AU  - D. Ganguly
AU  - A. D. Sharma
AU  - U. Ramakrishnan
AU  - A. Srivathsa
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.25.754339
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.25.754339v1
AB  - Reliable estimates of population size are fundamental to understanding wildlife population status and informing conservation. Obtaining such estimates remains challenging for unmarked species, particularly in tropical countries where logistical and financial constraints limit intensive monitoring. The endangered dhole (Cuon alpinus), a highly social canid without natural markings, is one such species for which robust population estimates remain scarce. We estimated dhole density in the Valparai plateau, a human-dominated agroforest-forest mosaic in India's Western Ghats. We compared Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture (SECR) models based on individual identification from fecal DNA and Space-to-Event (STE) models based on camera-trap detections. We additionally applied both approaches to individually identifiable leopards (Panthera pardus) to cross-validate STE versus SECR estimates. SECR estimated dhole density at 22 individuals per 100 sq.km, with STE estimates varying substantially depending on how the camera viewshed area was defined. STE estimates based on post hoc viewshed measurements, particularly after reducing the viewshed by 10%, were comparable to SECR estimates. In contrast, STE underestimated leopard density relative to SECR (7 versus 12 per 100 sq.km), although uncertainty intervals overlapped. Ecologically, our results indicate that human-use agroforest mosaics can support dhole densities comparable to, or exceeding, those reported from several Protected Areas, highlighting their potential importance for dhole conservation. More broadly, we argue that STE models may offer a practical and relatively inexpensive approach for baseline monitoring of dholes from camera-trap surveys, but their reliability depends strongly on accurate characterization of the effective viewshed and may vary across species and landscapes.
ER  -