On conducting diary-based social contact surveys to inform transmission models of close-contact infections: a systematic review and expert-informed questionnaire
- 1Hasselt University and University of Antwerp
Abstract
Background: Diary-based social contact surveys are widely used to parameterise transmission models of close-contact infections. However, variation in study design, contact definitions, and questionnaire content limits comparability across studies. These challenges became particularly evident during the COVID-19 pandemic, when rapid and repeated data collection was urgently needed, often without harmonised instruments. To address these challenges, we aimed to develop an expert-informed questionnaire and update the recommendations on conducting diary-based social contact studies previously proposed by Hoang et al. (2019). Methods and findings: We conducted a systematic review of diary-based social contact surveys published between 31 January 2018 and 25 September 2025 using PubMed and the Web of Science Core Collection, extracting information on study design, survey methodology, contact definitions, and survey items from available questionnaires. Methodological quality and reporting were assessed using an adapted AXIS tool, with results summarised for each criterion. In total, we identified 129 studies across 62 countries, with most studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (59.7% in 2021-2022). Retrospective reporting (86.0%) and non-probability sampling (77.5%) were largely adopted and became increasingly common during the pandemic, while non-paper-based data collection rose sharply from 2021 onwards. Across 36 retrievable questionnaires from general-population surveys, we identified 54 survey items. An online assessment involving 26 experts informed the classification of these items according to their perceived importance, resulting in an expert-informed questionnaire comprising 22 core items. Based on our findings, we updated previous recommendations on sampling, survey methods, contact definitions, behavioural change, essential contact information, and data governance. Conclusions: This study provides an expert-informed questionnaire and updated recommendations to support harmonised social contact data collection, improve comparability across studies, and strengthen preparedness for future public health emergencies.
Related
- Researchers Behavioral Intentions to Engage in Knowledge Translation Activities and Their Association with Bibliometric Indicators: A Theory of Planned Behavior-Informed Questionnaire Study
- Clostridioides difficile infections and beyond: molecular epidemiology, One Health transmission chains, under-surveilled regions, and the next generation of diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines
- Cephalexin Model-Informed Dosing Recommendations for Severe Infections: A Pooled Pharmacokinetic Analysis From Infancy to Adulthood.
- Population Pharmacokinetics and Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Colistin Sulfate in Critically Ill Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections: A Prospective Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Study.
- Burden and associated factors of urinary tract infections among pregnant women in Ghana: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BibTeX
@misc{loedy2026conducting,
title = {{On conducting diary-based social contact surveys to inform transmission models of close-contact infections: a systematic review and expert-informed questionnaire}},
author = {N. Loedy and G. Lumia and L. Di Domenico and J. Suer and M. Jit and A. Melegaro and S. Funk and J. A. Backer and C. G. Grijalva and D. Paolotti and J. Verbiest and O. Ratmann and P. Coletti and S. Dan and V. Colizza and P. Beutels and L. Willem and S. Abrams and N. Hens},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.64898/2026.11.06.26367418},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.06.26367418v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - On conducting diary-based social contact surveys to inform transmission models of close-contact infections: a systematic review and expert-informed questionnaire
AU - N. Loedy
AU - G. Lumia
AU - L. Di Domenico
AU - J. Suer
AU - M. Jit
AU - A. Melegaro
AU - S. Funk
AU - J. A. Backer
AU - C. G. Grijalva
AU - D. Paolotti
AU - J. Verbiest
AU - O. Ratmann
AU - P. Coletti
AU - S. Dan
AU - V. Colizza
AU - P. Beutels
AU - L. Willem
AU - S. Abrams
AU - N. Hens
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/06
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.11.06.26367418
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.06.26367418v1
AB - Background: Diary-based social contact surveys are widely used to parameterise transmission models of close-contact infections. However, variation in study design, contact definitions, and questionnaire content limits comparability across studies. These challenges became particularly evident during the COVID-19 pandemic, when rapid and repeated data collection was urgently needed, often without harmonised instruments. To address these challenges, we aimed to develop an expert-informed questionnaire and update the recommendations on conducting diary-based social contact studies previously proposed by Hoang et al. (2019). Methods and findings: We conducted a systematic review of diary-based social contact surveys published between 31 January 2018 and 25 September 2025 using PubMed and the Web of Science Core Collection, extracting information on study design, survey methodology, contact definitions, and survey items from available questionnaires. Methodological quality and reporting were assessed using an adapted AXIS tool, with results summarised for each criterion. In total, we identified 129 studies across 62 countries, with most studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (59.7% in 2021-2022). Retrospective reporting (86.0%) and non-probability sampling (77.5%) were largely adopted and became increasingly common during the pandemic, while non-paper-based data collection rose sharply from 2021 onwards. Across 36 retrievable questionnaires from general-population surveys, we identified 54 survey items. An online assessment involving 26 experts informed the classification of these items according to their perceived importance, resulting in an expert-informed questionnaire comprising 22 core items. Based on our findings, we updated previous recommendations on sampling, survey methods, contact definitions, behavioural change, essential contact information, and data governance. Conclusions: This study provides an expert-informed questionnaire and updated recommendations to support harmonised social contact data collection, improve comparability across studies, and strengthen preparedness for future public health emergencies.
ER -