Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDOncology letters

An interpretable machine-learning model to predict moderate-to-severe acute radiation esophagitis following regional nodal irradiation for breast cancer.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Chengdu Qingbaijiang District People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan 610300, P.R. China.
  2. 2Department of Oncology, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command of The Chinese People's Liberation Army, Chengdu, Sichuan 610083, P.R. China.
  3. 3Department of Ophthalmology, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command of The Chinese People's Liberation Army, Chengdu, Sichuan 610083, P.R. China.
  4. 4School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, P.R. China.

Abstract

Acute radiation esophagitis (ARE) is a clinically relevant toxicity occurring in patients with breast cancer receiving post-operative regional nodal irradiation. The present study aimed to develop and evaluate an interpretable machine-learning (ML) model for grade ≥2 ARE. A total of 324 patients were allocated by outcome-stratified random sampling (7:3) to a training set (n=228) and a held-out test set (n=96). A total of six consensus predictors were retained: Pre-existing pruritus, histological grade, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, tumor laterality and the relative esophageal volume receiving ≥30 Gy (RV_V30). In total, 10 ML algorithms were evaluated. Bootstrap internal validation (1,000 resamples) revealed that logistic regression (LR) had the lowest mean optimism among the three preferred candidates (0.027). Final model selection considered bootstrap stability and corrected performance together with held-out discrimination and calibration, model complexity and clinical interpretability. In the held-out test set, LR achieved an area under the curve value of 0.797 (95% confidence interval, 0.706-0.889), a Brier score of 0.179, a calibration slope of 1.258 and a calibration-in-the-large of -0.056. Decision curve analysis revealed positive net benefit relative to treat-all and treat-none strategies across threshold probabilities of 10-66%. SHapley Additive exPlanations identified histological grade, RV_V30 and BMI as the most influential predictors. The final model was implemented as a nomogram and web-based calculator. Overall, the present study demonstrates that this six-feature clinical-dosimetric model may support individualized risk stratification and radiotherapy planning, but prospective multicenter external validation is required before routine clinical use.

Related

  1. Interpretable deep learning and radiomics for predicting the occurrence of brain metastases following prophylactic brain irradiation in small cell lung cancer
    Xingtong Zhang, Lei Zhao, Jie Wang +5
    Translational Lung Cancer ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  2. Radiation-induced meningioma and high-grade glioma following craniospinal irradiation for medulloblastoma: a case report.
    Kelsey Carey, Violet Quann, Wenyin Shi +1
    Surgical neurology internationalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  3. Interpretable machine learning for postoperative sepsis prediction in ICU patients following intracranial hematoma evacuation.
    Shaoyang Yu, Yun Liu, Lei Guo +8
    Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  4. Endoscopic and Symptomatic Outcomes of Vonoprazan for Erosive Esophagitis Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: An Exploratory Prospective Study
    Hideharu Okanobu, Kazuki Boda, Akihiro Sakai +7
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineJ-STAGE
  5. Development and validation of a deep learning model for differentiating cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus esophagitis using endoscopic images
    Ji Eun Kim, Yeong Chan Lee, Young Eun Oh +6
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{he2026interpretable,
  title = {{An interpretable machine-learning model to predict moderate-to-severe acute radiation esophagitis following regional nodal irradiation for breast cancer.}},
  author = {Bin He and Zhongchun Qi and Hengdi Zhang and Linling Li and Hua Li and Xinyun Zou and Yu Tan and Ling Zhang and Fangyuan Kong},
  journal = {Oncology letters},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3892/ol.2026.15909},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948379},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - An interpretable machine-learning model to predict moderate-to-severe acute radiation esophagitis following regional nodal irradiation for breast cancer.
AU  - Bin He
AU  - Zhongchun Qi
AU  - Hengdi Zhang
AU  - Linling Li
AU  - Hua Li
AU  - Xinyun Zou
AU  - Yu Tan
AU  - Ling Zhang
AU  - Fangyuan Kong
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
JO  - Oncology letters
DO  - 10.3892/ol.2026.15909
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948379
AB  - Acute radiation esophagitis (ARE) is a clinically relevant toxicity occurring in patients with breast cancer receiving post-operative regional nodal irradiation. The present study aimed to develop and evaluate an interpretable machine-learning (ML) model for grade ≥2 ARE. A total of 324 patients were allocated by outcome-stratified random sampling (7:3) to a training set (n=228) and a held-out test set (n=96). A total of six consensus predictors were retained: Pre-existing pruritus, histological grade, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, tumor laterality and the relative esophageal volume receiving ≥30 Gy (RV_V30). In total, 10 ML algorithms were evaluated. Bootstrap internal validation (1,000 resamples) revealed that logistic regression (LR) had the lowest mean optimism among the three preferred candidates (0.027). Final model selection considered bootstrap stability and corrected performance together with held-out discrimination and calibration, model complexity and clinical interpretability. In the held-out test set, LR achieved an area under the curve value of 0.797 (95% confidence interval, 0.706-0.889), a Brier score of 0.179, a calibration slope of 1.258 and a calibration-in-the-large of -0.056. Decision curve analysis revealed positive net benefit relative to treat-all and treat-none strategies across threshold probabilities of 10-66%. SHapley Additive exPlanations identified histological grade, RV_V30 and BMI as the most influential predictors. The final model was implemented as a nomogram and web-based calculator. Overall, the present study demonstrates that this six-feature clinical-dosimetric model may support individualized risk stratification and radiotherapy planning, but prospective multicenter external validation is required before routine clinical use.
SN  - 1792-1074
SN  - 1792-1082
ER  -