Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 36 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Comparative study of a reference PCR assay targeting kinetoplast DNA and a commercial kit targeting ribosomal DNA for the molecular diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis

  1. 1Department of Parasitology-Mycology, National Reference Center for Leishmaniasis, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, University Hospital Center (CHU) of Montpellier, MiVEGEC, Montpellier, France

Abstract

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a severe parasitic disease that requires accurate and timely diagnosis to prevent fatal outcomes. Molecular methods, particularly quantitative PCR (qPCR), have become central to VL diagnosis because of their high sensitivity and specificity. However, assay performance depends on several factors, including the choice of DNA target. We compared the analytical and clinical performance of an in-house reference qPCR targeting kinetoplast DNA with the Viasure Leishmania Real-Time PCR Detection Kit targeting 18S ribosomal DNA. Analytical evaluation included PCR efficiency, linearity ranges, and detection limits. Clinical performance was assessed using 30 blood samples representative of routine diagnostic practice. Both assays showed high efficiency and broad linearity, but the kinetoplast DNA assay achieved a lower limit of detection. Clinical comparison performed on a cohort representative of the routine activity revealed substantial agreement, although the Viasure method produced several false-negative results and non-reproducible positives (amplification in only one of two replicate wells), mainly in samples with very low parasite levels. This likely reflected differences in target copy number, as kinetoplast DNA is present in thousands of copies per parasite, whereas ribosomal DNA occurs in only a few dozen copies. High analytical sensitivity is essential for diagnosis and follow-up because minimal parasitemia is common, and missed diagnoses can have severe consequences. Our findings indicate that assays targeting kinetoplast DNA should be preferred over ribosomal DNA-based alternatives for blood-based diagnosis and monitoring of visceral leishmaniasis.

IMPORTANCE: Accurate diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is essential to prevent delayed treatment and fatal outcomes. Molecular assays have become central to diagnosis, but their performance varies with the genetic target used. This study shows that assays targeting kinetoplast DNA provide superior sensitivity compared to ribosomal DNA-based methods, particularly in cases with very low parasite burdens—a common scenario in clinical practice. The difference likely reflects the much higher copy number of kinetoplast DNA, which enhances detection when parasite levels approach the limit of detection. These findings underscore the need for assay developers to prioritize high-copy-number targets to ensure reliable diagnosis and effective monitoring of treatment response, reducing the risk of relapse and improving patient outcomes.

Related

  1. Assessing the comparative longitudinal immunogenicity of two commercial foot-and-mouth disease vaccines in crossbred dairy calves in Sebeta Hawas, Ethiopia
    Daniel Gizaw, Ayenalem Fentie, Takele Worku +7
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPlant biologyCrossref
  2. A Comparative Evaluation of Dye Removal in Batch and Air-Lift Systems by Commercial and Crude Laccase Immobilized on Biochar
    Anja Antanasković, Milan Milivojević, Zorica Lopičić +3
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPlant biologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. Comparative laboratory and field assessment of commercial and nanoformulated metaldehyde baits against Monacha obstructa
    Esam M. Emara, Rasha F. Khalifa, Fathallah A. Ayoob
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textZoology & animal behaviourCrossref
  4. Gut bacterium of Leishmania donovani-non-transmitting sand fly induces IL-23~Th17 axis to protect hosts from drug-resistant visceral leishmaniasis
    S. Karmakar, P. Mandal, S. Nath +9
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textImmunologybioRxiv
  5. Systemic IgG responses to Leishmania braziliensis–derived extracellular vesicles vary across clinical forms of American tegumentary leishmaniasis and associate with early therapeutic outcome
    Fabio C. Peixoto, José M. Guimarães, Carlos A. Oliveira Junior +6
    Frontiers in immunologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textImmunologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{andreotti2026comparative,
  title = {{Comparative study of a reference PCR assay targeting kinetoplast DNA and a commercial kit targeting ribosomal DNA for the molecular diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis}},
  author = {Quentin Andreotti and Eva Lemont and Nada Kuk and Mathilde Criado and Christophe Ravel and Yvon Sterkers},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Microbiology},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1128/jcm.00666-26},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00666-26},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative study of a reference PCR assay targeting kinetoplast DNA and a commercial kit targeting ribosomal DNA for the molecular diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis
AU  - Quentin Andreotti
AU  - Eva Lemont
AU  - Nada Kuk
AU  - Mathilde Criado
AU  - Christophe Ravel
AU  - Yvon Sterkers
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
JO  - Journal of Clinical Microbiology
DO  - 10.1128/jcm.00666-26
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00666-26
AB  - Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a severe parasitic disease that requires accurate and timely diagnosis to prevent fatal outcomes. Molecular methods, particularly quantitative PCR (qPCR), have become central to VL diagnosis because of their high sensitivity and specificity. However, assay performance depends on several factors, including the choice of DNA target. We compared the analytical and clinical performance of an in-house reference qPCR targeting kinetoplast DNA with the Viasure Leishmania Real-Time PCR Detection Kit targeting 18S ribosomal DNA. Analytical evaluation included PCR efficiency, linearity ranges, and detection limits. Clinical performance was assessed using 30 blood samples representative of routine diagnostic practice. Both assays showed high efficiency and broad linearity, but the kinetoplast DNA assay achieved a lower limit of detection. Clinical comparison performed on a cohort representative of the routine activity revealed substantial agreement, although the Viasure method produced several false-negative results and non-reproducible positives (amplification in only one of two replicate wells), mainly in samples with very low parasite levels. This likely reflected differences in target copy number, as kinetoplast DNA is present in thousands of copies per parasite, whereas ribosomal DNA occurs in only a few dozen copies. High analytical sensitivity is essential for diagnosis and follow-up because minimal parasitemia is common, and missed diagnoses can have severe consequences. Our findings indicate that assays targeting kinetoplast DNA should be preferred over ribosomal DNA-based alternatives for blood-based diagnosis and monitoring of visceral leishmaniasis.  IMPORTANCE: Accurate diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is essential to prevent delayed treatment and fatal outcomes. Molecular assays have become central to diagnosis, but their performance varies with the genetic target used. This study shows that assays targeting kinetoplast DNA provide superior sensitivity compared to ribosomal DNA-based methods, particularly in cases with very low parasite burdens—a common scenario in clinical practice. The difference likely reflects the much higher copy number of kinetoplast DNA, which enhances detection when parasite levels approach the limit of detection. These findings underscore the need for assay developers to prioritize high-copy-number targets to ensure reliable diagnosis and effective monitoring of treatment response, reducing the risk of relapse and improving patient outcomes.
SN  - 0095-1137
SN  - 1098-660X
ER  -