The Effective Visual Acuity of Butterflies in Flight
- 1Imperial College London
Abstract
The spatial visual acuity of an eye is determined by both the spatial sampling density of the retina and the angular sensitivity of individual photoreceptors. In insect compound eyes, these are respectively characterised by the interommatidial angle, {Delta}{varphi}, and photoreceptor acceptance angle, {Delta}{rho}. During movement, however, finite photoreceptor integration times cause retinal image motion to broaden the effective acceptance angle, potentially degrading spatial resolution beyond its anatomical limit. This problem is especially acute in flying insects, which experience large rotational velocities during locomotion and must actively stabilise gaze to limit retinal image motion. Butterflies present a particularly demanding case because their flight is characterised by large, wingbeat-coupled thoracic oscillations. Here, we quantify how gaze stabilisation limits motion blur in freely flying Monarch butterflies Danaus plexippus by combining free-flight kinematic reconstruction of the head and thorax with separate intracellular measurements of photoreceptor acceptance angles and integration times from quiescent butterflies. We found that, without head compensation, thoracic oscillations would broaden the effective photoreceptor acceptance angle from its quiescent value of 2.17{degrees} to 9.38{degrees} during take-off. Compensatory head movements substantially reduced this motion-induced broadening, limiting the effective acceptance angle to 5.28{degrees}. Nevertheless, this 2.4-fold broadening of effective photoreceptor acceptance angle represents a substantial degradation of spatial acuity in flight, highlighting motion blur as an important constraint on the visual ecology of flying butterflies.
Related
- Evolution of compound eye cell types shapes visual behaviors across Heliconius butterflies
- Low contrast visual acuity in healthy adults: Impact on non-pathologic myopia
- Predictors of improvement in distance presenting visual acuity after refraction and reading rehabilitation at ≤ 1.5 M print size in older adults with low vision
- Female Monarch Butterflies Are More Successful than Males During the Fall Migration: A Literature Review
- New larval host plants for a few Indian butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera)
BibTeX
@misc{supple2026effective,
title = {{The Effective Visual Acuity of Butterflies in Flight}},
author = {J. A. Supple and W. Li and M. Ilic and M. Kos and H.-T. Lin and G. Belusic and H. G. Krapp},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.30.755797},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.30.755797v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - The Effective Visual Acuity of Butterflies in Flight
AU - J. A. Supple
AU - W. Li
AU - M. Ilic
AU - M. Kos
AU - H.-T. Lin
AU - G. Belusic
AU - H. G. Krapp
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.30.755797
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.30.755797v1
AB - The spatial visual acuity of an eye is determined by both the spatial sampling density of the retina and the angular sensitivity of individual photoreceptors. In insect compound eyes, these are respectively characterised by the interommatidial angle, {Delta}{varphi}, and photoreceptor acceptance angle, {Delta}{rho}. During movement, however, finite photoreceptor integration times cause retinal image motion to broaden the effective acceptance angle, potentially degrading spatial resolution beyond its anatomical limit. This problem is especially acute in flying insects, which experience large rotational velocities during locomotion and must actively stabilise gaze to limit retinal image motion. Butterflies present a particularly demanding case because their flight is characterised by large, wingbeat-coupled thoracic oscillations. Here, we quantify how gaze stabilisation limits motion blur in freely flying Monarch butterflies Danaus plexippus by combining free-flight kinematic reconstruction of the head and thorax with separate intracellular measurements of photoreceptor acceptance angles and integration times from quiescent butterflies. We found that, without head compensation, thoracic oscillations would broaden the effective photoreceptor acceptance angle from its quiescent value of 2.17{degrees} to 9.38{degrees} during take-off. Compensatory head movements substantially reduced this motion-induced broadening, limiting the effective acceptance angle to 5.28{degrees}. Nevertheless, this 2.4-fold broadening of effective photoreceptor acceptance angle represents a substantial degradation of spatial acuity in flight, highlighting motion blur as an important constraint on the visual ecology of flying butterflies.
ER -