Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
206,690 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Ophthalmology Science

Data-Efficient Transformer Model for Retinal Artery-Vein Segmentation in Landmark-Deficient OCT Angiography

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
  2. 2Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
  3. 3John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawaii
  4. 4Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
  5. 5Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri

Abstract

Objective: Accurately differentiating arteries from veins in highly magnified foveal 3 × 3-mm2 macular OCT angiography (OCTA) is critical for quantifying retinal vascular disease. However, existing models require macrovascular landmarks absent at this field of view, hindering vessel-specific analysis in clinical imaging. We developed and validated a data-efficient, 2-stage transformer for artery-vein (AV) segmentation in landmark-deficient macular OCTA and evaluated whether the resulting vessel maps could identify retinal vein occlusion (RVO) biomarkers without disease-specific retraining.

Design: Cross-sectional model development and validation study.

Participants: The development cohort comprised 17 eyes (29 scans) from 9 healthy adult volunteers (mean age, 32 years). A subsequent RVO pilot cohort included 9 foveal OCTA scans from patients with confirmed RVO, compared against 15 healthy control scans.

Methods: Independent 2-stage Swin-Unet transformer trained on sparse annotations from 12 eyes, applied without retraining to 5 test eyes and the RVO pilot cohort.

Main Outcome Measures: Artery-vein segmentation Dice coefficients, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Clinical RVO end points included the major vein-to-artery sinuosity ratio and the 10th-percentile artery radius.

Results: The framework demonstrated exceptional internal validation and crucially, when applied to the external RVO cohort, the model successfully identified established pathophysiological hallmarks. Stage 1 global segmentation achieved AUC 0.973 and Dice 88.6%. Stage 2 AV classification achieved Dice 96.3% (arteries) and 96.1% (veins). End-to-end system Dice coefficients were 87.3% and 84.1% for arteries and veins, respectively. Applied to RVO without retraining, the model identified significantly elevated major vein/artery sinuosity (1.041 vs. 1.010; P = 0.007; AUC, 0.837) and reduced 10th-percentile artery radius (13.2 vs. 15.4 μm; P = 0.002; AUC, 0.885).

Conclusions: This data-efficient framework enables high-fidelity AV segmentation in landmark-deficient OCTA. By combining conventional methods with newer transformer models and decoupling structural segmentation from classification, the model identified biologically consistent biomarkers in RVO from small sets of scans. This supports highly scalable automated vessel specific quantification in clinical macular imaging; these pilot findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant prospective validation.

Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Related

  1. Reliability of the L3 Transverse Process as a Landmark for Lumbar Spine Enumeration Across Different Vertebral Segmentation Patterns: A Retrospective CT Study
    Jakub Jankowski, Natalia Maślanek, Marcin Glin +4
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Evaluating the real-world accessibility of open-source deep learning models for retinal vessel segmentation in optical coherence tomography angiography
    Dayu Liu, Madeleine S. Torcasso, David Alonso-Caneiro +8
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyCrossref
  3. Feature-token clinical transformer for 24-h landmark mortality risk stratification in critically ill patients with heart failure: development and multicenter external validation
    Mianxian Li, Yuefei Zhou, Chun Li
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossrefEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  4. Topology-preserving coronary vessel segmentation in X-ray angiography using ResNet50-MASAG-UNet.
    G Sunilkumar, P Kumaresan
    Frontiers in radiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMCPMC
  5. GAMPoint: Geometry-augmented vision transformer with a multimodal-ready interface for 3D point-cloud segmentation
    Xinyu Mu, Xuan He, Ziqi Huang +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textBiophysicsNeurosciencePLOSEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{manjaly2026dataefficient,
  title = {{Data-Efficient Transformer Model for Retinal Artery-Vein Segmentation in Landmark-Deficient OCT Angiography}},
  author = {Cyriac Manjaly and Haneen Alfauri and Aditya Santoki and Nicholas Kikuta and Lauren Pollack and Senyue Hao and Chao Zhou and Rithwick Rajagopal},
  journal = {Ophthalmology Science},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1016/j.xops.2026.101416},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2026.101416},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Data-Efficient Transformer Model for Retinal Artery-Vein Segmentation in Landmark-Deficient OCT Angiography
AU  - Cyriac Manjaly
AU  - Haneen Alfauri
AU  - Aditya Santoki
AU  - Nicholas Kikuta
AU  - Lauren Pollack
AU  - Senyue Hao
AU  - Chao Zhou
AU  - Rithwick Rajagopal
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/23
JO  - Ophthalmology Science
DO  - 10.1016/j.xops.2026.101416
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2026.101416
AB  - Objective: Accurately differentiating arteries from veins in highly magnified foveal 3 × 3-mm2 macular OCT angiography (OCTA) is critical for quantifying retinal vascular disease. However, existing models require macrovascular landmarks absent at this field of view, hindering vessel-specific analysis in clinical imaging. We developed and validated a data-efficient, 2-stage transformer for artery-vein (AV) segmentation in landmark-deficient macular OCTA and evaluated whether the resulting vessel maps could identify retinal vein occlusion (RVO) biomarkers without disease-specific retraining.  Design: Cross-sectional model development and validation study.  Participants: The development cohort comprised 17 eyes (29 scans) from 9 healthy adult volunteers (mean age, 32 years). A subsequent RVO pilot cohort included 9 foveal OCTA scans from patients with confirmed RVO, compared against 15 healthy control scans.  Methods: Independent 2-stage Swin-Unet transformer trained on sparse annotations from 12 eyes, applied without retraining to 5 test eyes and the RVO pilot cohort.  Main Outcome Measures: Artery-vein segmentation Dice coefficients, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Clinical RVO end points included the major vein-to-artery sinuosity ratio and the 10th-percentile artery radius.  Results: The framework demonstrated exceptional internal validation and crucially, when applied to the external RVO cohort, the model successfully identified established pathophysiological hallmarks. Stage 1 global segmentation achieved AUC 0.973 and Dice 88.6%. Stage 2 AV classification achieved Dice 96.3% (arteries) and 96.1% (veins). End-to-end system Dice coefficients were 87.3% and 84.1% for arteries and veins, respectively. Applied to RVO without retraining, the model identified significantly elevated major vein/artery sinuosity (1.041 vs. 1.010; P = 0.007; AUC, 0.837) and reduced 10th-percentile artery radius (13.2 vs. 15.4 μm; P = 0.002; AUC, 0.885).  Conclusions: This data-efficient framework enables high-fidelity AV segmentation in landmark-deficient OCTA. By combining conventional methods with newer transformer models and decoupling structural segmentation from classification, the model identified biologically consistent biomarkers in RVO from small sets of scans. This supports highly scalable automated vessel specific quantification in clinical macular imaging; these pilot findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant prospective validation.  Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
SN  - 2666-9145
ER  -