Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,226 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
PreprintCC BY-SA 4.0arXiv

Community structure of the pseudofractal web

Abstract

The Ramsey community number rκ is the smallest network size at which a graph is better described by a partition into communities than by no partition, under a prescribed detection rule. On a scale-free graph this question is confounded: a block model can split the network merely to absorb its degree distribution. I compute rκ analytically for the deterministic pseudofractal scale-free web of Dorogovtsev, Goltsev, and Mendes, separating genuine community structure from degree heterogeneity with two closed-form detection rules. Under a plain Bernoulli stochastic block model, the web's natural recursive bipartition is unpreferred while small and breaks at rκ=1095 nodes, with a log-evidence growing as (ln 3−2/3ln 2)n. Under a degree-corrected model tested against the configuration-model null, the same partition survives, breaking far earlier at rκ=42, with a log-evidence growing as (2ln 3−4/3ln 2)n -- exactly twice the plain slope, and independent of the prior. Degree correction reverses the ordering of the candidate cuts, demoting the hub-leaf split and elevating the recursive one. Because the web is self-similar, the best description is not two communities but a nested hierarchy: the degree-corrected evidence keeps rising as the partition is refined, and is maximised at of order √n communities of ∼√n nodes. A purely local recursive rule thus builds true hierarchical community structure, over and above the scale-free degree sequence it also produces, in an exactly solvable setting.

Versions

Related

  1. When do token systems stabilize? Compatibility constraints and community structure
    Flore Sentenac, Mingwei Yang, Sophie H. Yu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
  2. First and second order firing statistics of large neuronal networks with community structure
    Thiago H. N. Coelho, Daniel Figueiredo, Giulio Iacobelli +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityarXiv
  3. Dynamical analysis of a three-community model for malware transmission
    Ziheng Cheng, Hanqing Hu, Teng Ma +1
    Electronic Journal of Differential EquationsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral mathematicsDOAJ
  4. Discretization-free exact recovery in geometric community detection
    Maarten Hoeneveld, Moritz Otto, Raphaël Sala
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityarXiv
  5. Community Detection using the Edge Laplacian Dynamics vis-a-vis Ricci Flow
    Pratibha Bhandari, Soumyendu Raha
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textDynamical systemsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{vazquez2026community,
  title = {{Community structure of the pseudofractal web}},
  author = {Alexei Vazquez},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2607.03010},
  eprint = {2607.03010},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03010},
  note = {CC BY-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Community structure of the pseudofractal web
AU  - Alexei Vazquez
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2607.03010
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03010
AB  - The Ramsey community number r_κ is the smallest network size at which a graph is better described by a partition into communities than by no partition, under a prescribed detection rule. On a scale-free graph this question is confounded: a block model can split the network merely to absorb its degree distribution. I compute r_κ analytically for the deterministic pseudofractal scale-free web of Dorogovtsev, Goltsev, and Mendes, separating genuine community structure from degree heterogeneity with two closed-form detection rules. Under a plain Bernoulli stochastic block model, the web's natural recursive bipartition is unpreferred while small and breaks at r_κ=1095 nodes, with a log-evidence growing as (ln 3−2/3ln 2)n. Under a degree-corrected model tested against the configuration-model null, the same partition survives, breaking far earlier at r_κ=42, with a log-evidence growing as (2ln 3−4/3ln 2)n -- exactly twice the plain slope, and independent of the prior. Degree correction reverses the ordering of the candidate cuts, demoting the hub-leaf split and elevating the recursive one. Because the web is self-similar, the best description is not two communities but a nested hierarchy: the degree-corrected evidence keeps rising as the partition is refined, and is maximised at of order √n communities of ∼√n nodes. A purely local recursive rule thus builds true hierarchical community structure, over and above the scale-free degree sequence it also produces, in an exactly solvable setting.
ER  -