Trainee Access to Major Procedures in an Academic Emergency Department: Are We Doing Enough?
- 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
- 2School of Medicine, the University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.
Abstract
Introduction
The Australasian College for Emergency Medicine requires trainee competency in many procedures; however, real-world practicalities may not align with expectations. The objective of this study was to record the number of procedures performed by trainees in an academic emergency department (ED). Any gaps identified in exposure to procedures could help guide alternative forms of training.Method
A prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary ED in Perth, Western Australia, between 1 February 2024 and 31 January 2025. Data were collected on 14 procedures via self-reporting using a QR code linked to a Microsoft form. Procedure numbers, median per trainee, and range of procedures are reported. Full-time versus part-time rates were compared. Six-monthly sub-analyses were performed to account for changes in personnel mid-year.Results
Of 1413 procedures, 771 (54.6%) were performed by trainees. The median number performed was 10.5 (IQR = 6-23). There was no significant difference between those working full-time versus part-time (median = 15, IQR = 9-23 vs. median = 8, IQR = 4-16; p = 0.11). There was no significant difference between the two 6-month periods (median = 8.5, IQR = 4.3-13.8 vs. median = 9, IQR = 5.75-15, p = 0.51). Procedures commonly performed were sedation (207/405, 51.1%), intubation (121/193, 62.7%) and arterial lines (90/150, 60%).Conclusions
Access to procedures is limited. Alternative forms of training should be incorporated into education programmes. A lack of exposure has wider implications for assessing competency in emergency medicine and should be considered in any future curriculum update.
Related
- Is painless colonoscopy associated with trainee learning? A single-center study of insertion speed and adenoma detection curves in 1,769 procedures.
- Brachial artery access for endovascular procedures: how safe is it?
- Automated Calculation of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) Intra-Abdominal Injury Rule from Unstructured Emergency Department Notes Using a Large Language Model
- Emergency Department Management of Ankle Fractures: A Narrative Review
- Antipsychotic-Induced Parkinsonism With Concurrent Benztropine-Associated Anticholinergic Effects in a Community Emergency Department Setting: A Case Report
BibTeX
@article{jones2026trainee,
title = {{Trainee Access to Major Procedures in an Academic Emergency Department: Are We Doing Enough?}},
author = {Christopher L Jones and Sylvia Rienks and Femke Verbossche},
journal = {Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1111/1742-6723.70372},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902873},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Trainee Access to Major Procedures in an Academic Emergency Department: Are We Doing Enough?
AU - Christopher L Jones
AU - Sylvia Rienks
AU - Femke Verbossche
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA
DO - 10.1111/1742-6723.70372
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902873
AB - Introduction The Australasian College for Emergency Medicine requires trainee competency in many procedures; however, real-world practicalities may not align with expectations. The objective of this study was to record the number of procedures performed by trainees in an academic emergency department (ED). Any gaps identified in exposure to procedures could help guide alternative forms of training.Method A prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary ED in Perth, Western Australia, between 1 February 2024 and 31 January 2025. Data were collected on 14 procedures via self-reporting using a QR code linked to a Microsoft form. Procedure numbers, median per trainee, and range of procedures are reported. Full-time versus part-time rates were compared. Six-monthly sub-analyses were performed to account for changes in personnel mid-year.Results Of 1413 procedures, 771 (54.6%) were performed by trainees. The median number performed was 10.5 (IQR = 6-23). There was no significant difference between those working full-time versus part-time (median = 15, IQR = 9-23 vs. median = 8, IQR = 4-16; p = 0.11). There was no significant difference between the two 6-month periods (median = 8.5, IQR = 4.3-13.8 vs. median = 9, IQR = 5.75-15, p = 0.51). Procedures commonly performed were sedation (207/405, 51.1%), intubation (121/193, 62.7%) and arterial lines (90/150, 60%).Conclusions Access to procedures is limited. Alternative forms of training should be incorporated into education programmes. A lack of exposure has wider implications for assessing competency in emergency medicine and should be considered in any future curriculum update.
SN - 1742-6731
SN - 1742-6723
ER -