Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Do DESI-DR2 BAO data imply a coupling of dark matter and dark energy?

Abstract

We revisit an interacting dark matter (DM) -- dark energy (DE) model characterized by the interaction function Q = Γρx, where Γ is a constant coupling parameter and ρx is the energy density of DE. This type of interaction is independent of the Hubble rate or other external parameters, but depends only on the fundamental properties of DE, such as its equation of state (EoS), wx. We pay special attention to wx and study three distinct interacting scenarios distinguished by the nature of wx, i.e. wx =−1 (when DE corresponds to the vacuum energy), wx < −1 (when DE has a phantom behavior), and wx > −1 (quintessential DE). We constrain all of them using the most recent cosmological datasets, including CMB from Planck 2018, BAO from DESI DR2, and three compilations of SNIa (PantheonPlus, Union3, and DES-Dovekie). Our analyses reveal that evidence of interaction is supported in scenarios with wx =−1 and wx < −1 when all three datasets are combined, but from the Bayesian evidence analysis, ΛCDM remains favored over these interacting scenarios. Regarding the S8 parameter, when wx > −1, this interacting scenario leads to mildly lower estimates across all datasets.

Versions

Related

  1. The unified Bound Dark Energy--Bound Dark Matter model: theory and constraints from DESI DR2
    Jose Agustin Lozano Torres, Axel de la Macorra
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyarXiv
  2. Revisiting self-interacting dark matter with DESI DR2 baryon acoustic oscillation observations
    Yixuan Zhu, Shuo Cao, Xuanni chen +3
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsCosmologyCrossref
  3. Constraints on coupled dark energy in the DESI era
    Anonymous, Ziyang Zheng, Luca Amendola
    Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Peer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text21 citedCosmologyOpenAlex
  4. How theory-informed priors affect DESI evidence for evolving dark energy
    Michael W. Toomey, Gabriele Montefalcone, Evan McDonough +1
    Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Peer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text31 citedCosmologyOpenAlex
  5. Dark Energy in the DESI Era: A Brief Review of Evidence, Beyond-ΛCDM Interpretations, and Tensions
    Tian-Nuo Li, Guohong Du, Hao Wang +3
    Research in Astronomy and AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text23 citedCosmologyOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{yang2026desidr2,
  title = {{Do DESI-DR2 BAO data imply a coupling of dark matter and dark energy?}},
  author = {Weiqiang Yang and Sibo Zhang and Dinorah Barbosa and Marco Antonio Alvarez and Supriya Pan and Leila Graef},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.05660},
  eprint = {2609.05660},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05660},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Do DESI-DR2 BAO data imply a coupling of dark matter and dark energy?
AU  - Weiqiang Yang
AU  - Sibo Zhang
AU  - Dinorah Barbosa
AU  - Marco Antonio Alvarez
AU  - Supriya Pan
AU  - Leila Graef
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.05660
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05660
AB  - We revisit an interacting dark matter (DM) -- dark energy (DE) model characterized by the interaction function Q = Γρ_x, where Γ is a constant coupling parameter and ρ_x is the energy density of DE. This type of interaction is independent of the Hubble rate or other external parameters, but depends only on the fundamental properties of DE, such as its equation of state (EoS), w_x. We pay special attention to w_x and study three distinct interacting scenarios distinguished by the nature of w_x, i.e. w_x =−1 (when DE corresponds to the vacuum energy), w_x < −1 (when DE has a phantom behavior), and w_x > −1 (quintessential DE). We constrain all of them using the most recent cosmological datasets, including CMB from Planck 2018, BAO from DESI DR2, and three compilations of SNIa (PantheonPlus, Union3, and DES-Dovekie). Our analyses reveal that evidence of interaction is supported in scenarios with w_x =−1 and w_x < −1 when all three datasets are combined, but from the Bayesian evidence analysis, ΛCDM remains favored over these interacting scenarios. Regarding the S_8 parameter, when w_x > −1, this interacting scenario leads to mildly lower estimates across all datasets.
ER  -