Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)

Genotype-Phenotype Predictive Gap in Pre-Emptive Screening of DPD Deficiency: Improving Sensitivity.

  1. 1Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy.
  2. 2Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Sant'Andrea Hospital of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: toxicity related to treatment with the anti-cancer drugs fluoropyrimidines (FP) is mainly driven by a deficiency in the dihydropyrimidine-dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme activity. Standardized pharmacogenomic markers in the DPYD gene allow pre-emptive prediction and therapy adjustment in patients testing positive, but the rarity of these markers lowers screening sensitivity, leaving a significant part of at-risk individuals undetected. This study aimed to explore the diagnostic performance of genetic screening tests modelled to include unclassified rare DPYD variants and the common SNPs rs1801160 and rs2297595. Methods: this is a retrospective genotype-phenotype association study including 687 Italian subjects who underwent DPD-phenotyping by the 5-fluorouracil degradation assay (5-FUDR) and DPYD genotyping by full exon sequencing. According to their DPD-phenotype, subjects were grouped into a DPD deficiency group (DD, N = 94; >30% reduction in 5-FUDR) and a normal DPD activity group (NDA, N = 593). The phenotype was used as the reference standard to assess genotype-based functional prediction, and discordant genotype-phenotype cases were scored as false negatives or false positives. The phenotype (DD or NDA) prediction power of a genetic, binary (presence/absence) screening test including standardized pharmacogenomic markers (Test 1) was compared to binary tests including missense, nonsense, frameshift or splice-site rare variants (Test 2) or the co-occurrence of rs1801160 and rs2297595 (Test 3). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, correcting for multiple testing when appropriate. Results: positivity for all binary tests was significantly associated with the DPD deficiency phenotype (Test1: OR = 6; Test 2: OR = 4.85; Test3: OR = 4.9). Notably, overlap among subjects testing positive in the different tests was minimal. Combining all tests, a 3-fold increase in screening sensitivity was achieved compared to the reference Test 1 (from 12.77% to 35.11%), with a slight decrease in specificity from 97.64% to 91.74%. Conclusions: the proposed approach can refine the genetic predictivity of the DPD-deficiency phenotype in pre-emptive screening, capturing a significantly larger pool of biochemically at-risk patients.

Related

  1. GATA2 Deficiency Presenting With a WHIM‐Like Phenotype and Subsequent Development of Monosomy 7‐Associated Myelodysplastic Syndrome in an Adolescent Female: A Case Report
    Aziz Eghbali, Meshkat Poortavakol, Hamideh Sadat Mirmohammadi
    Clinical case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  2. Improving MASLD Identification in Patients with T2D: A Computable Phenotype Framework Integrating Structured Data and Clinical Notes
    Y. Chen, A. Sharma, Q. Yang +2
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  3. Genetic and clinical phenotype analysis of a case of high-molecular-weight kininogen deficiency caused by a frameshift mutation c.628_629delAA in the KNG1 gene
    Fengjiao Wang, Haixiao Xie, Xingxing Zhou +3
    Annals of HematologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text1 citedHuman geneticsPMC
  4. Improving obstructive sleep apnea screening in patients with atrial fibrillation (SLEEP-AF project)
    T. Jennifer Walker, Tracy Vernon Platt, Suja Davis +2
    Heart rhythm O2Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  5. RAD51D deficiency enhances IFN-JAK-STAT signaling to upregulate PD-L1 and increase sensitivity to PD-L1 blockade in colorectal cancer
    Chen Qian, Yining Fu, Xu Shi +5
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{salerno2026genotypephenotype,
  title = {{Genotype-Phenotype Predictive Gap in Pre-Emptive Screening of DPD Deficiency: Improving Sensitivity.}},
  author = {Gerardo Salerno and Ottavia De Luca and Caterina Ilari and Maurizio Simmaco and Marina Borro},
  journal = {Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/ph19101551},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42943248},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Genotype-Phenotype Predictive Gap in Pre-Emptive Screening of DPD Deficiency: Improving Sensitivity.
AU  - Gerardo Salerno
AU  - Ottavia De Luca
AU  - Caterina Ilari
AU  - Maurizio Simmaco
AU  - Marina Borro
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/ph19101551
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42943248
AB  - Background/Objectives: toxicity related to treatment with the anti-cancer drugs fluoropyrimidines (FP) is mainly driven by a deficiency in the dihydropyrimidine-dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme activity. Standardized pharmacogenomic markers in the DPYD gene allow pre-emptive prediction and therapy adjustment in patients testing positive, but the rarity of these markers lowers screening sensitivity, leaving a significant part of at-risk individuals undetected. This study aimed to explore the diagnostic performance of genetic screening tests modelled to include unclassified rare DPYD variants and the common SNPs rs1801160 and rs2297595. Methods: this is a retrospective genotype-phenotype association study including 687 Italian subjects who underwent DPD-phenotyping by the 5-fluorouracil degradation assay (5-FUDR) and DPYD genotyping by full exon sequencing. According to their DPD-phenotype, subjects were grouped into a DPD deficiency group (DD, N = 94; >30% reduction in 5-FUDR) and a normal DPD activity group (NDA, N = 593). The phenotype was used as the reference standard to assess genotype-based functional prediction, and discordant genotype-phenotype cases were scored as false negatives or false positives. The phenotype (DD or NDA) prediction power of a genetic, binary (presence/absence) screening test including standardized pharmacogenomic markers (Test 1) was compared to binary tests including missense, nonsense, frameshift or splice-site rare variants (Test 2) or the co-occurrence of rs1801160 and rs2297595 (Test 3). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, correcting for multiple testing when appropriate. Results: positivity for all binary tests was significantly associated with the DPD deficiency phenotype (Test1: OR = 6; Test 2: OR = 4.85; Test3: OR = 4.9). Notably, overlap among subjects testing positive in the different tests was minimal. Combining all tests, a 3-fold increase in screening sensitivity was achieved compared to the reference Test 1 (from 12.77% to 35.11%), with a slight decrease in specificity from 97.64% to 91.74%. Conclusions: the proposed approach can refine the genetic predictivity of the DPD-deficiency phenotype in pre-emptive screening, capturing a significantly larger pool of biochemically at-risk patients.
SN  - 1424-8247
ER  -