Addressing the Engagement Blind Spot: 12-Tip Tutorial to Make Reasoning Audible in Health Professions Education.
- 1Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, MD3, 16 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117600, Singapore, 65 96832935.
- 2Centre for Medical Education, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
Unlabelled
Student engagement reforms have increased active learning in higher education. However, visible participation does not always require students to rehearse the spoken, interactive forms of reasoning central to professional practice, such as explaining one's thinking, responding to challenges, building on others' ideas, and working through uncertainty in real time. We describe this gap as an engagement blind spot. We define audible reasoning as the deliberate externalization of disciplinary or professional reasoning through spoken interaction so that its assumptions, evidence, uncertainty, and justification can be examined, challenged, revised, and developed collaboratively. It is particularly relevant in health professions education and also applies to laboratory-based and scientific disciplines where students must communicate their reasoning under conditions of uncertainty, scrutiny, and collaboration. Digital, hybrid, asynchronous, and AI-enabled learning environments sharpen this blind spot. Shared documents, online quizzes, discussion boards, and generative AI tools can support participation and access; however, they can also allow students to engage without speaking or to produce polished answers without making the underlying reasoning visible. In this context, educators need to ask not only whether students are engaged but also what behaviors they are rehearsing and whether their reasoning is available for examination and development. This tutorial offers 12 practical, evidence-informed tips developed iteratively from recurring challenges encountered in teaching, curriculum design, and faculty development and refined against selected literature. The tips are organized around 4 clusters covering the design of activities that require audible reasoning, the elicitation of reasoning in practice, the development of reasoning through listening and response, and the preservation of audible reasoning in digital and AI-enhanced environments. Across these 4 clusters, we suggest small but intentional shifts that help educators move from silent, constructive tasks toward audible, dialogic, and professionally relevant participation. These include designing tasks around uncertainty, creating low-stakes opportunities for spoken reasoning, using digital tools to surface and organize contributions for further discussion, structuring active listening and peer feedback, reviewing group dialogue formatively, and using conversational AI as a rehearsal partner rather than an authority. These strategies require attention to psychological safety, cultural responsiveness, accessibility, equity, privacy, data governance, and ongoing monitoring. Audible reasoning is not synonymous with speaking more, volunteering more frequently, or sounding fluent. Designing for audible reasoning is not simply an engagement strategy. It is a way of helping students practice the communicative and collaborative behaviors needed to explain, defend, question, and revise human judgment in clinical, scientific, and other professional contexts.
Related
- Preserving Clinical Reasoning in ChatGPT-Integrated Medical Education: From AI Use to Cognitive Engagement.
- Who Learns from Disruption? Antifragility and Burden Transfer in Health Professions Education
- Beyond the clicker: rethinking student response systems as pedagogical infrastructure for healthcare professions education
- Adapting the Girandole framework for cross-disciplinary social justice reflection in health professions education
- How to … Do Feasibility, Acceptability and Potential Effectiveness Studies in Health Professions Education Research
BibTeX
@article{indran2026addressing,
title = {{Addressing the Engagement Blind Spot: 12-Tip Tutorial to Make Reasoning Audible in Health Professions Education.}},
author = {Inthrani Raja Indran and Dujeepa D Samarasekera},
journal = {JMIR medical education},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.2196/104702},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42904377},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Addressing the Engagement Blind Spot: 12-Tip Tutorial to Make Reasoning Audible in Health Professions Education.
AU - Inthrani Raja Indran
AU - Dujeepa D Samarasekera
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/20
JO - JMIR medical education
DO - 10.2196/104702
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42904377
AB - Unlabelled Student engagement reforms have increased active learning in higher education. However, visible participation does not always require students to rehearse the spoken, interactive forms of reasoning central to professional practice, such as explaining one's thinking, responding to challenges, building on others' ideas, and working through uncertainty in real time. We describe this gap as an engagement blind spot. We define audible reasoning as the deliberate externalization of disciplinary or professional reasoning through spoken interaction so that its assumptions, evidence, uncertainty, and justification can be examined, challenged, revised, and developed collaboratively. It is particularly relevant in health professions education and also applies to laboratory-based and scientific disciplines where students must communicate their reasoning under conditions of uncertainty, scrutiny, and collaboration. Digital, hybrid, asynchronous, and AI-enabled learning environments sharpen this blind spot. Shared documents, online quizzes, discussion boards, and generative AI tools can support participation and access; however, they can also allow students to engage without speaking or to produce polished answers without making the underlying reasoning visible. In this context, educators need to ask not only whether students are engaged but also what behaviors they are rehearsing and whether their reasoning is available for examination and development. This tutorial offers 12 practical, evidence-informed tips developed iteratively from recurring challenges encountered in teaching, curriculum design, and faculty development and refined against selected literature. The tips are organized around 4 clusters covering the design of activities that require audible reasoning, the elicitation of reasoning in practice, the development of reasoning through listening and response, and the preservation of audible reasoning in digital and AI-enhanced environments. Across these 4 clusters, we suggest small but intentional shifts that help educators move from silent, constructive tasks toward audible, dialogic, and professionally relevant participation. These include designing tasks around uncertainty, creating low-stakes opportunities for spoken reasoning, using digital tools to surface and organize contributions for further discussion, structuring active listening and peer feedback, reviewing group dialogue formatively, and using conversational AI as a rehearsal partner rather than an authority. These strategies require attention to psychological safety, cultural responsiveness, accessibility, equity, privacy, data governance, and ongoing monitoring. Audible reasoning is not synonymous with speaking more, volunteering more frequently, or sounding fluent. Designing for audible reasoning is not simply an engagement strategy. It is a way of helping students practice the communicative and collaborative behaviors needed to explain, defend, question, and revise human judgment in clinical, scientific, and other professional contexts.
SN - 2369-3762
ER -