Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Immunology

Perioperative immune optimization and surgical readiness in thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis: current evidence and emerging strategies

  1. 1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shenyang Tenth People’s Hospital, Shenyang
  2. 2Department of Neurology, Shenyang Tenth People’s Hospital, Shenyang

Abstract

Thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis (TAMG) complicates perioperative management because neurological vulnerability must be weighed against the physiological demands of tumor resection. This review examines operation-specific assessment and rapid immune optimization, compares established treatments with emerging neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibition, and proposes a dual-axis framework integrating myasthenia gravis (MG)-related vulnerability and anticipated operative burden. Intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange remain the established rapid-treatment options when clinically meaningful improvement is needed before surgery. FcRn inhibition provides a mechanistically distinct means of lowering circulating immunoglobulin G. Among FcRn inhibitors, efgartigimod has the most direct perioperative evidence in TAMG, but available studies are small, nonrandomized, and largely confined to selected adults with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive disease undergoing planned surgery. No randomized trial or TAMG-specific active-comparator study has demonstrated that perioperative efgartigimod reduces postoperative myasthenic crisis or other surgical complications. Its optimal preoperative schedule and the value of routine postoperative continuation remain uncertain. Decisions about rapid immune optimization should consider the recent MG trajectory, bulbar and respiratory function, secretion clearance, operative demands, and available postoperative support. Surgical readiness requires multidisciplinary judgment tailored to the planned operation; it cannot be determined by a single clinical score, antibody level, or predetermined treatment course. The proposed dual-axis framework is intended to structure this discussion but has not been validated.

Related

  1. Astrocytic GABAergic signaling in perioperative neurocognitive disorders: mechanisms and intervention strategies
    Ting Tang, Xingcen Wang, HuiJuan Huang +2
    Frontiers in neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
  2. ASO Video Abstract: How to Deal with Median Arcuate Ligament during Pancreaticoduodenectomy? Management Strategies and Impact on Perioperative Outcomes
    Elena Fernandez-De-Sevilla, Maxime K. Collard, Raffaele Vincenzo de Rosa +17
    Annals of Surgical OncologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral biologyOncologyHAL
  3. Macrophage state in neoadjuvant and perioperative immunotherapy resistance in resectable NSCLC: a critical appraisal of strategies from CSF1R and CD47–SIRPα to CAR-macrophages
    Hang Li, Bingqiang Li, Zhongkun Li +5
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0ImmunologyFrontiersCrossref
  4. Integrated fermentation optimization and downstream purification strategies for enhanced monascin and ankaflavin production by Monascus purpureus TST
    Tzu-Hsing Lin, Qin-Yang Lian, Bo-Quan Zhong +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSystems & synthetic biologyCrossref
  5. Clinical practice and optimization strategies for comprehensive nutritional support in gastric cancer patients
    Huang Xiao, Ding Qianyuan, Qin Wenke +3
    生物医学转化Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSystems & synthetic biologyGeneral medicineDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{wang2026perioperative,
  title = {{Perioperative immune optimization and surgical readiness in thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis: current evidence and emerging strategies}},
  author = {Linlin Wang and Zhihan Wang and Yong Feng},
  journal = {Frontiers in Immunology},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2026.2032777},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.2032777/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Perioperative immune optimization and surgical readiness in thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis: current evidence and emerging strategies
AU  - Linlin Wang
AU  - Zhihan Wang
AU  - Yong Feng
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/09
JO  - Frontiers in Immunology
DO  - 10.3389/fimmu.2026.2032777
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.2032777/full
AB  - Thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis (TAMG) complicates perioperative management because neurological vulnerability must be weighed against the physiological demands of tumor resection. This review examines operation-specific assessment and rapid immune optimization, compares established treatments with emerging neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibition, and proposes a dual-axis framework integrating myasthenia gravis (MG)-related vulnerability and anticipated operative burden. Intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange remain the established rapid-treatment options when clinically meaningful improvement is needed before surgery. FcRn inhibition provides a mechanistically distinct means of lowering circulating immunoglobulin G. Among FcRn inhibitors, efgartigimod has the most direct perioperative evidence in TAMG, but available studies are small, nonrandomized, and largely confined to selected adults with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive disease undergoing planned surgery. No randomized trial or TAMG-specific active-comparator study has demonstrated that perioperative efgartigimod reduces postoperative myasthenic crisis or other surgical complications. Its optimal preoperative schedule and the value of routine postoperative continuation remain uncertain. Decisions about rapid immune optimization should consider the recent MG trajectory, bulbar and respiratory function, secretion clearance, operative demands, and available postoperative support. Surgical readiness requires multidisciplinary judgment tailored to the planned operation; it cannot be determined by a single clinical score, antibody level, or predetermined treatment course. The proposed dual-axis framework is intended to structure this discussion but has not been validated.
SN  - 1664-3224
ER  -