Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,693 studies31 sourcesUpdated 53 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Transparent Weighting of Heterogeneous Evidence for Auditable Candidate Prioritization

  1. 1VNU University of Science

Abstract

Motivation: Differential-expression and network-based prioritization capture complementary molecular evidence. However, integrating these criteria poses a trade-off between score integration and methodological transparency. Existing approaches derive weights through optimization against predictive or benchmark metrics, or use manual or equal-weight settings without explicitly encoding the rationale for relative criterion importance. Results: We introduce AHP-CDS, an auditable candidate-ranking method that makes criterion importance explicit through weights derived from the Analytic Hierarchy Process from explicit pairwise judgments, which allows the resulting rankings to be evaluated through consistency, sensitivity and contribution analyses. The resulting pairwise judgments achieved acceptable consistency (Consistency Ratio = 0.050). The leave-one-criterion-out analysis showed that ranking sensitivity followed the assigned weight ordering: the removal of Fold-change producing most of the disruption (Spearman compare to full method ρ = 0.796), whereas removing betweeness causes the least (ρ = 0.992). Score decomposition further made individual rank changes traceable to their evidence dimension. Contact: [email protected] or [email protected] Availability: all code is uploaded on \url{https://github.com/NguyenMauTue/PRIDE-breast-cancer-exosome-biomarker-discovery} Supplementary: Is all posted online

Related

  1. Hyperbolic heterogeneous graph learning for adverse drug reaction prediction, candidate prioritization, and pathway-based interpretation in pharmacovigilance
    Ru Lv, Xiaoyu Xu, Yulin Ji +3
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Pharmacology & toxicologyFrontiersCrossref
  2. Deploying YOLO for whole-slide mitosis detection: A transparent, auditable, and reproducible pipeline for pathology AI-assisted diagnosis and decision-support tool
    Peter Omozokpia Obami, Aniruddha Ketkar, Samuel Ayobami Fasogbon +7
    Journal of Pathology InformaticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  3. Structure-based computational prioritization of Emodin-8-glucoside as a candidate ligand for the VEGFR1 kinase domain in the context of placenta previa
    Deniz Inan, Sinan Karageçili, Nouman Ali
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCell biologyPharmacology & toxicologyPLOS
  4. Multi-Omics Prioritization and Clinical Evaluation of CYP4V2 as a Candidate Biomarker in Venous Thromboembolism.
    Chen Zhang, Jie Xu, Ming Zhang +7
    International journal of general medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and kidney disease: Genetic associations and computational prioritization of candidate toxicogenomic pathways
    Dianjie Zeng, Yuxi Wang, Yinhuai Wang +3
    PLOS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsPharmacology & toxicologyPLOS
BibTeX
@misc{nguyen2026transparent,
  title = {{Transparent Weighting of Heterogeneous Evidence for Auditable Candidate Prioritization}},
  author = {T. M. Nguyen},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = may,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.05.14.725271},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.14.725271v6},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Transparent Weighting of Heterogeneous Evidence for Auditable Candidate Prioritization
AU  - T. M. Nguyen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/05/14
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.05.14.725271
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.14.725271v6
AB  - Motivation: Differential-expression and network-based prioritization capture complementary molecular evidence. However, integrating these criteria poses a trade-off between score integration and methodological transparency. Existing approaches derive weights through optimization against predictive or benchmark metrics, or use manual or equal-weight settings without explicitly encoding the rationale for relative criterion importance. Results: We introduce AHP-CDS, an auditable candidate-ranking method that makes criterion importance explicit through weights derived from the Analytic Hierarchy Process from explicit pairwise judgments, which allows the resulting rankings to be evaluated through consistency, sensitivity and contribution analyses. The resulting pairwise judgments achieved acceptable consistency (Consistency Ratio = 0.050). The leave-one-criterion-out analysis showed that ranking sensitivity followed the assigned weight ordering: the removal of Fold-change producing most of the disruption (Spearman compare to full method ρ = 0.796), whereas removing betweeness causes the least (ρ = 0.992). Score decomposition further made individual rank changes traceable to their evidence dimension. Contact: [email protected] or [email protected] Availability: all code is uploaded on \url{https://github.com/NguyenMauTue/PRIDE-breast-cancer-exosome-biomarker-discovery} Supplementary: Is all posted online
ER  -