Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of chemical information and modeling

Energy Landscape Sampling Reveals Ligand-Dependent Structural Dynamics of the Protease-Activated Receptor 1.

6 affiliations
  1. 1Institute for Drug Discovery, Leipzig University, Brüderstraße 34, 04103Leipzig, Germany.
  2. 2Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostic, University Hospital Leipzig, Paul-List-Straße 13-15, 04103Leipzig, Germany.
  3. 3Rudolf Schönheimer Institute of Biochemistry, Molecular Biochemistry, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Johannisallee 30, 04103Leipzig, Germany.
  4. 4LeiCeM─Leipzig Center of Metabolism, Leipzig University, 04103Leipzig, Germany.
  5. 5Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, Leipzig University, 04107Leipzig, Germany.
  6. 6Center for Scalable Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence, Leipzig University, 04105Leipzig, Germany.

Abstract

Protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) is a class A G protein-coupled receptor activated by proteolytic cleavage and exposure of a tethered agonist. While existing structures have revealed inactive and active conformations, the ligand-dependent conformational energy landscape governing PAR1 activation remains poorly understood. Here, we employed enhanced-sampling molecular dynamics simulations using the string method with swarms of trajectories to quantify how extracellular ligands and G-protein binding modulate PAR1 activation. Free-energy landscapes were computed for five receptor states (apo, tethered agonist, thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP), vorapaxar (VPX), and VPX + Na+) using five transmembrane (TM) helix distance metrics as collective variables. In the apo state, PAR1 samples inactive, intermediate, and active-like conformations, indicating substantial intrinsic receptor flexibility. VPX increases the free energy of active conformations and restricts TM helix 5 and 6 rearrangements, while VPX + Na+ eliminates intermediate basins and stabilizes the inactive state. In contrast, the tethered agonist stabilizes the active state as the global minimum and promotes TM6 displacement of up to ∼1 nm. The simulations reveal a continuous activation pathway linking extracellular ligand engagement to intracellular motifs, including the connector, DRF, intracellular loop 3 (ICL3), and KRK motifs, with intracellular chloride ion coordination contributing to inactive-state stabilization. Gαq binding reduces TM6 flexibility and shifts the free-energy minimum toward more active-like conformations. Alanine mutagenesis and Gq-CASE BRET assays validate predicted roles of key residues in activation and G-protein coupling. Together, these results provide a detailed understanding of ligand- and transducer-dependent PAR1 signaling and inform the design of pathway-selective PAR1 modulators.

Related

  1. Structural basis for membrane-dependent positive feedback regulation of DOCK11 by activated Cdc42.
    Tamao Hisano, Takehiro Shinoda, Mutsuko Kukimoto-Niino +8
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMC
  2. Mapping Light-Induced Conformational Dynamics of Pigeon Cryptochrome 4 by HDX-MS: Structural Transitions from Spin Pair Formation to Activated Conformational States
    G. S. Jagdale, V. Fan, P. Dubey +4
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textBiophysicsbioRxiv
  3. Frequency-Dependent Structural Responses of Amyloid-β Fibrils to Terahertz Pulses: A Nonequilibrium Molecular Dynamics Study
    Y. Wang, J. Dai, X. Peng +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textBiophysicsbioRxiv
  4. Structural basis of voltage gating in a partially activated K+ channel
    Richa Agrawal, Ramon Mendoza Uriarte, Bernardo I. Pinto-Anwandter +6
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  5. Structural basis of isoform-specific cAMP regulation and autoinhibition in hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels
    Valentina Zorzini, Jessica Kleiz-Ferreira, Marijke Brams +4
    The Journal of Biological ChemistryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
BibTeX
@article{schwerin2026energy,
  title = {{Energy Landscape Sampling Reveals Ligand-Dependent Structural Dynamics of the Protease-Activated Receptor 1.}},
  author = {Inken Kaja Schwerin and Shihai Jiang and Claudia Stäubert and Berend Isermann and Georg Künze},
  journal = {Journal of chemical information and modeling},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1021/acs.jcim.6c01315},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42912924},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Energy Landscape Sampling Reveals Ligand-Dependent Structural Dynamics of the Protease-Activated Receptor 1.
AU  - Inken Kaja Schwerin
AU  - Shihai Jiang
AU  - Claudia Stäubert
AU  - Berend Isermann
AU  - Georg Künze
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Journal of chemical information and modeling
DO  - 10.1021/acs.jcim.6c01315
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42912924
AB  - Protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) is a class A G protein-coupled receptor activated by proteolytic cleavage and exposure of a tethered agonist. While existing structures have revealed inactive and active conformations, the ligand-dependent conformational energy landscape governing PAR1 activation remains poorly understood. Here, we employed enhanced-sampling molecular dynamics simulations using the string method with swarms of trajectories to quantify how extracellular ligands and G-protein binding modulate PAR1 activation. Free-energy landscapes were computed for five receptor states (apo, tethered agonist, thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP), vorapaxar (VPX), and VPX + Na+) using five transmembrane (TM) helix distance metrics as collective variables. In the apo state, PAR1 samples inactive, intermediate, and active-like conformations, indicating substantial intrinsic receptor flexibility. VPX increases the free energy of active conformations and restricts TM helix 5 and 6 rearrangements, while VPX + Na+ eliminates intermediate basins and stabilizes the inactive state. In contrast, the tethered agonist stabilizes the active state as the global minimum and promotes TM6 displacement of up to ∼1 nm. The simulations reveal a continuous activation pathway linking extracellular ligand engagement to intracellular motifs, including the connector, DRF, intracellular loop 3 (ICL3), and KRK motifs, with intracellular chloride ion coordination contributing to inactive-state stabilization. Gαq binding reduces TM6 flexibility and shifts the free-energy minimum toward more active-like conformations. Alanine mutagenesis and Gq-CASE BRET assays validate predicted roles of key residues in activation and G-protein coupling. Together, these results provide a detailed understanding of ligand- and transducer-dependent PAR1 signaling and inform the design of pathway-selective PAR1 modulators.
SN  - 1549-9596
SN  - 1549-960X
ER  -