Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Effectiveness and Safety of Low-Level Red Light and Short-Wavelength Light Therapy for Myopia Control and Prevention in Children: A Systematic Review

  1. 1Department of Optometry, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background: Myopia is a major public health challenge, particularly among children, with prevalence increasing worldwide. Emerging light-based interventions, including low-level red light (LLRL) and short-wavelength light therapy, may be effective for myopia control. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of LLRL and short-wavelength light therapy for myopia control in children. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and EBSCO in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies published between 2013 and 2026 assessing the effectiveness and safety of LLRL and short-wavelength therapies for myopia control were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist. Intervention outcomes included changes in axial length (AL), spherical equivalent refraction (SER), and choroidal thickness (CT). Safety outcomes comprised evaluations of both structural and functional retinal damage, along with assessment of ocular surface complications following the intervention. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (with registration number CRD420261289443). Results: Twenty-six studies reported that LLRL therapy effectively slowed myopia progression in children; however, some retinal structural and functional changes warrant further long-term safety evaluation. LLRL significantly reduced AL elongation and SER progression, increased macular CT, and delayed the onset of myopia. Some studies indicated that LLRL therapy may achieve greater efficacy in myopia control compared with 0.01% atropine. Reported adverse events include photophobia, dry eye symptoms, altered color perception, conjunctivitis, and visual discomfort. Six studies showed that short-wavelength light therapy reduced AL elongation and induced short-term choroidal changes. No serious ocular or systemic adverse events were reported with short-wavelength light therapy; however, long-term safety requires further investigation. Conclusions: Light-based therapies, particularly LLRL and short-wavelength light interventions, show promise as non-pharmacological approaches for myopia control; conversely, current evidence remains insufficient to establish their long-term safety. LLRL therapy has demonstrated efficacy in reducing AL, increasing CT, and delaying SER progression. However, reported retinal changes and ocular surface symptoms underscore the importance of close monitoring, standardized treatment protocols, and long-term safety evaluation in large-scale clinical trials.

Related

  1. Effectiveness of community-based care pathways and relapse prevention strategies in schizophrenia: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis
    Isymiarni Syarif, Hasnawati Amqam, Noyumala +2
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Psychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  2. Effectiveness of multicomponent interventions for children and adolescents with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xinyue Wang, Ju Yang, Jiai Yan +5
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. The effectiveness of addiction prevention training based on dialectical behavior therapy on family friendship and loneliness in adolescent boys.
    Navid Nasr Esfahani, Abbas Adnan Kamel, Zahra Yousefi
    Journal of education and health promotionPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  4. Cost-effectiveness of malaria prevention strategies in children under five in high-endemic settings
    K Bashlakova, M Zarro, G Federico +2
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMCEurope PMC
  5. Cost-effectiveness of anti-inflammatory reliever (AIR) or maintenance and reliever therapy (MART) for mild to moderate asthma: a systematic review.
    Nqobile Ndimande, Kevin Mortimer, Marie Stolbrink +3
    BMJ open respiratory researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{alrasheed2026effectiveness,
  title = {{Effectiveness and Safety of Low-Level Red Light and Short-Wavelength Light Therapy for Myopia Control and Prevention in Children: A Systematic Review}},
  author = {Saif Hassan Alrasheed and Naveen Kumar Challa},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15218493},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8493},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Effectiveness and Safety of Low-Level Red Light and Short-Wavelength Light Therapy for Myopia Control and Prevention in Children: A Systematic Review
AU  - Saif Hassan Alrasheed
AU  - Naveen Kumar Challa
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15218493
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8493
AB  - Background: Myopia is a major public health challenge, particularly among children, with prevalence increasing worldwide. Emerging light-based interventions, including low-level red light (LLRL) and short-wavelength light therapy, may be effective for myopia control. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of LLRL and short-wavelength light therapy for myopia control in children. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and EBSCO in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies published between 2013 and 2026 assessing the effectiveness and safety of LLRL and short-wavelength therapies for myopia control were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist. Intervention outcomes included changes in axial length (AL), spherical equivalent refraction (SER), and choroidal thickness (CT). Safety outcomes comprised evaluations of both structural and functional retinal damage, along with assessment of ocular surface complications following the intervention. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (with registration number CRD420261289443). Results: Twenty-six studies reported that LLRL therapy effectively slowed myopia progression in children; however, some retinal structural and functional changes warrant further long-term safety evaluation. LLRL significantly reduced AL elongation and SER progression, increased macular CT, and delayed the onset of myopia. Some studies indicated that LLRL therapy may achieve greater efficacy in myopia control compared with 0.01% atropine. Reported adverse events include photophobia, dry eye symptoms, altered color perception, conjunctivitis, and visual discomfort. Six studies showed that short-wavelength light therapy reduced AL elongation and induced short-term choroidal changes. No serious ocular or systemic adverse events were reported with short-wavelength light therapy; however, long-term safety requires further investigation. Conclusions: Light-based therapies, particularly LLRL and short-wavelength light interventions, show promise as non-pharmacological approaches for myopia control; conversely, current evidence remains insufficient to establish their long-term safety. LLRL therapy has demonstrated efficacy in reducing AL, increasing CT, and delaying SER progression. However, reported retinal changes and ocular surface symptoms underscore the importance of close monitoring, standardized treatment protocols, and long-term safety evaluation in large-scale clinical trials.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -