Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare

Development and Internal Validation of a Perioperative Model for Predicting Early Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery.

  1. 1Department of Anesthesiology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
  2. 2Nursing Department, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

Background

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent complication after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. The classic Apfel score is widely used for risk assessment, but its individual-level discrimination may be limited in this relatively homogeneous high-risk population.Methods

We conducted a single-center prospective observational model-development study of 487 patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia. Nineteen candidate predictors were considered. Exploratory univariable screening (P<0.10), followed by backward elimination using the Akaike information criterion, was used to derive the multivariable logistic model. The blood-loss cut-point was selected by comparing candidate cut-points that retained at least 10% of patients in each group. Internal validation used 1000 bootstrap resamples in which the complete screening, cut-point selection, and backward-elimination procedure was repeated.Results

Overall, 216 patients (44.4%) developed 0-24 h PONV. The final eight-predictor model had an apparent AUC of 0.706 and Brier score of 0.214. After bootstrap correction of the complete development procedure, the AUC was 0.666, the Brier score was 0.229, the calibration slope was 0.793, and the calibration intercept was -0.001. The apparent AUC exceeded that of the Apfel score (0.586; paired DeLong difference 0.121, 95% CI 0.070-0.171; P<0.001).Conclusion

The perioperative model showed moderate apparent discrimination, which decreased after correction for model-development optimism. The model is preliminary and requires prospective external validation, recalibration where necessary, and clinical-impact evaluation before routine use.

Related

  1. Perioperative transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: protocol for a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
    R. Wang, H. Yang, H. Li +5
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiamedRxiv
  2. Development and Validation of a Perioperative Risk Update Model for Postoperative Delirium in Patients Aged ≥ 80 Years Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Feifei Zhao, Huan Sai, Shan Peng +4
    Clinics in orthopedic surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Factors associated with postoperative ileus after laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer and development and internal validation of a postoperative risk-stratification nomogram
    Duoqin Qin, Weipeng Zhu, Jun Gong +5
    Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive TechniquesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJ
  4. Development and internal validation of a perioperative nomogram for predicting moderate-to-severe acute postoperative pain after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Juan Wang, Chunmei Fan, Wanqiu Zhang +2
    BMC surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  5. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation versus sham stimulation and dexamethasone versus amisulpride for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: protocol for a randomized 2 × 2 factorial trial
    Yu Li, Jun Zhang, Yu Xu +5
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Pharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{zheng2026development,
  title = {{Development and Internal Validation of a Perioperative Model for Predicting Early Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery.}},
  author = {Zihui Zheng and Qinzhu Wu and Yuhua Zhou},
  journal = {Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.2147/jmdh.s637369},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928769},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Development and Internal Validation of a Perioperative Model for Predicting Early Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery.
AU  - Zihui Zheng
AU  - Qinzhu Wu
AU  - Yuhua Zhou
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
JO  - Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare
DO  - 10.2147/jmdh.s637369
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42928769
AB  - Background  Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent complication after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. The classic Apfel score is widely used for risk assessment, but its individual-level discrimination may be limited in this relatively homogeneous high-risk population.Methods  We conducted a single-center prospective observational model-development study of 487 patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia. Nineteen candidate predictors were considered. Exploratory univariable screening (P<0.10), followed by backward elimination using the Akaike information criterion, was used to derive the multivariable logistic model. The blood-loss cut-point was selected by comparing candidate cut-points that retained at least 10% of patients in each group. Internal validation used 1000 bootstrap resamples in which the complete screening, cut-point selection, and backward-elimination procedure was repeated.Results  Overall, 216 patients (44.4%) developed 0-24 h PONV. The final eight-predictor model had an apparent AUC of 0.706 and Brier score of 0.214. After bootstrap correction of the complete development procedure, the AUC was 0.666, the Brier score was 0.229, the calibration slope was 0.793, and the calibration intercept was -0.001. The apparent AUC exceeded that of the Apfel score (0.586; paired DeLong difference 0.121, 95% CI 0.070-0.171; P<0.001).Conclusion  The perioperative model showed moderate apparent discrimination, which decreased after correction for model-development optimism. The model is preliminary and requires prospective external validation, recalibration where necessary, and clinical-impact evaluation before routine use.
SN  - 1178-2390
ER  -