Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 45 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology

Optimising electron beam 6 MeV radiotherapy: field-size-dependent dosimetric impact of perforated thermoplastic immobilisation masks.

4 affiliations
  1. 1LPPMOIA, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Oujda, Morocco.
  2. 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Hassan II Oncology Centre, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Oujda, Morocco.
  3. 3National Institute of Particle Physics and its Application, Oujda, Morocco.
  4. 4LaRSA, National School of Applied Sciences, Mohammed First University, Oujda, Morocco.

Abstract

Thermoplastic immobilisation masks are widely used in head and neck radiotherapy to ensure patient stability and reproducible positioning during treatment. Because these masks are placed directly in the beam path and consist of perforated polymer materials, they may influence electron dose distributions through additional attenuation and scattering effects, particularly for low-energy electron beams. This study quantifies the dosimetric effects of perforated thermoplastic masks, considering different hole diameters and electron field sizes. Monte Carlo simulations using GATE modelled 6 MeV electron beams passing through thermoplastic masks with 2 mm and 4 mm hole diameters across 3 × 3 cm2, 6 × 6 cm2, and 10 × 10 cm2 fields. Surface dose (D0), depth of maximum dose (R100), isodose depths (R90, R50), penumbra, flatness and gamma analysis (2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm) were evaluated. Masks increased D0 up to +5.9% for 2 mm holes and +4.18% for 4 mm holes. R100 showed up to -21.43% reduction for 2 mm masks, with lesser shifts using 4 mm holes. Penumbra widening was also detected, with a maximum relative increase of +4.40% at Zmax for the 6 × 6 cm2 field using the 2 mm mask. Gamma pass rates were better for 4 mm masks, especially at shallow depths. Masks with 4 mm perforations consistently outperformed 2 mm variants in dosimetric accuracy while maintaining effective immobilisation. Tailored mask selection based on field size improves clinical outcomes in electron beam radiotherapy.

Related

  1. Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Four-Field Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy in the Management of Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Dual-Centre Analysis
    Alaa AbdAllah, wafaa mohamed, Amani Saber +1
    Minia Journal of Medical ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textApplied physics & instrumentationDOAJ
  2. Dosimetric and Treatment Delivery Efficiency Comparison of Two Ring-gantry Linear Accelerator Platforms for Liver Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
    Srikanth Guduru, Rohith Singareddy, N. V. N. Madhusudhana Sresty +2
    Journal of Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textApplied physics & instrumentationDOAJ
  3. CBCT-Guided Online Adaptive Ultrahypofractionated Whole-Breast Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Dosimetric Outcomes and Acute Toxicity.
    Giovanni Ursi, Matea Lekić, Hrvoje Kaučić +5
    Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textApplied physics & instrumentationEurope PMC
  4. Exploratory machine-learning evaluation of clinical and dosimetric features in late prostate radiotherapy toxicity.
    Karl Jordan, Christopher J Talbot, John D Kelleher +2
    Clinical and translational radiation oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textApplied physics & instrumentationEurope PMC
  5. Comparative Dosimetric Evaluation of Tomotherapy with a 1-cm Field Width versus Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy for Whole-brain Radiotherapy with Hippocampal Avoidance
    Sankar Sekar, R. Leel Malar, Dinesh Babu A +4
    Journal of Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textApplied physics & instrumentationDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{rezzoug2026optimising,
  title = {{Optimising electron beam 6 MeV radiotherapy: field-size-dependent dosimetric impact of perforated thermoplastic immobilisation masks.}},
  author = {Mohammed Rezzoug and Yassine Oulhouq and Omar Hamzaoui and Mustapha Zerfaoui and Abdeslem Rrhioua and Dikra Bakari},
  journal = {Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.5603/rpor.113327},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42997874},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Optimising electron beam 6 MeV radiotherapy: field-size-dependent dosimetric impact of perforated thermoplastic immobilisation masks.
AU  - Mohammed Rezzoug
AU  - Yassine Oulhouq
AU  - Omar Hamzaoui
AU  - Mustapha Zerfaoui
AU  - Abdeslem Rrhioua
AU  - Dikra Bakari
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
JO  - Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology
DO  - 10.5603/rpor.113327
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42997874
AB  - Thermoplastic immobilisation masks are widely used in head and neck radiotherapy to ensure patient stability and reproducible positioning during treatment. Because these masks are placed directly in the beam path and consist of perforated polymer materials, they may influence electron dose distributions through additional attenuation and scattering effects, particularly for low-energy electron beams. This study quantifies the dosimetric effects of perforated thermoplastic masks, considering different hole diameters and electron field sizes. Monte Carlo simulations using GATE modelled 6 MeV electron beams passing through thermoplastic masks with 2 mm and 4 mm hole diameters across 3 × 3 cm2, 6 × 6 cm2, and 10 × 10 cm2 fields. Surface dose (D0), depth of maximum dose (R100), isodose depths (R90, R50), penumbra, flatness and gamma analysis (2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm) were evaluated. Masks increased D0 up to +5.9% for 2 mm holes and +4.18% for 4 mm holes. R100 showed up to -21.43% reduction for 2 mm masks, with lesser shifts using 4 mm holes. Penumbra widening was also detected, with a maximum relative increase of +4.40% at Zmax for the 6 × 6 cm2 field using the 2 mm mask. Gamma pass rates were better for 4 mm masks, especially at shallow depths. Masks with 4 mm perforations consistently outperformed 2 mm variants in dosimetric accuracy while maintaining effective immobilisation. Tailored mask selection based on field size improves clinical outcomes in electron beam radiotherapy.
SN  - 1507-1367
SN  - 2083-4640
ER  -