Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 16 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Public Health

Use of quality-of-care and patient-safety policies in the WHO European region: an ecological cross-sectional exploratory analysis of policy adoption and health outcomes

  1. 1Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS “Fondazione G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy

Abstract

Objective: To assess the implementation of quality-of-care and patient-safety policies across the WHO European Region and their association with population health outcomes.

Methods: This study used an exploratory, ecological cross-sectional design. We constructed a summary count (0–9) of nine national quality-of-care and patient-safety policies to capture the breadth of policy adoption, and used exploratory multivariable linear regression to examine cross-sectional associations with selected outcomes, adjusting for health-workforce density and public spending on health.

Results: Many countries lacked national action plans for quality and patient safety, with only around one-third implementing both. Implementation of a national quality-of-care plan was associated with higher healthy life expectancy (1.68 additional years; punadjusted = 0.033, p = 0.144), a lower probability of premature death from cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes and chronic respiratory diseases (−3.33 percentage points; punadjusted = 0.049, p = 0.144), and reduced under-five mortality (−4.06 deaths per 1,000 live births; punadjusted = 0.023, p = 0.144). Implementing a greater number of national policies was associated with small increases in healthy life expectancy (0.29 years per additional policy; punadjusted = 0.043, p = 0.167) and lower under-five mortality (−0.72 deaths per 1,000 live births per additional policy; punadjusted = 0.018, p = 0.162), while associations with other outcomes were weaker and often non-significant.

Conclusion: Given the ecological cross-sectional design, limited adjustment and multiple testing, these findings should be treated as exploratory and non-causal and used as a basis for more detailed longitudinal research.

Related

  1. Clinical AI Liability Literacy, Disclosure Confidence, and Adoption Readiness Among Romanian Healthcare Professionals: An Exploratory Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.
    Daian-Ionel Popa, Ciprian Gîndac, Florina Buleu +2
    European journal of investigation in health, psychology and educationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  2. Evaluating Healthcare Center Staff Attitudes Toward Adoption of Tobacco-Free Policies and Concurrent Tobacco Use and Behavioral Health Treatment in Rural and Medically Underserved Areas of Texas.
    Tarik D Goulbourne, Isabel Martinez Leal, Maggie Britton +6
    Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyEurope PMC
  3. Perspectives of European Nutrition Professionals on Healthy Eating Policies: An International Comparative Study of Implementation Gaps and Information Credibility
    Paweł Bryła, Beata Ciabiada-Bryła
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref
  4. Drug policies and annual opioid overdose mortality in U.S. states with the five worst and five best trends between 2018 and 2023: an ecological study
    Yun-Ting Wang, Said Iftekhar Sadaat, Daniel Ciccarone +2
    Addictive behaviors reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  5. Variation in public health reimbursement policies of ECT and rTMS across 28 European countries: A call for evidence-based policy reform from the ECNP Neuromodulation Network
    Nils Opel, Jovana Bjekić, Jérôme Brunelin +15
    Neuroscience AppliedPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedPsychiatry & mental healthHAL
BibTeX
@article{borgermans2026qualityofcare,
  title = {{Use of quality-of-care and patient-safety policies in the WHO European region: an ecological cross-sectional exploratory analysis of policy adoption and health outcomes}},
  author = {Liesbeth Borgermans and Ana Marques Domingues and Anna Crispo and Válter R. Fonseca and Lenio Capsaskis and Jennifer Hall and João Breda},
  journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1904393},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1904393},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Use of quality-of-care and patient-safety policies in the WHO European region: an ecological cross-sectional exploratory analysis of policy adoption and health outcomes
AU  - Liesbeth Borgermans
AU  - Ana Marques Domingues
AU  - Anna Crispo
AU  - Válter R. Fonseca
AU  - Lenio Capsaskis
AU  - Jennifer Hall
AU  - João Breda
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - Frontiers in Public Health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1904393
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1904393
AB  - Objective: To assess the implementation of quality-of-care and patient-safety policies across the WHO European Region and their association with population health outcomes.  Methods: This study used an exploratory, ecological cross-sectional design. We constructed a summary count (0–9) of nine national quality-of-care and patient-safety policies to capture the breadth of policy adoption, and used exploratory multivariable linear regression to examine cross-sectional associations with selected outcomes, adjusting for health-workforce density and public spending on health.  Results: Many countries lacked national action plans for quality and patient safety, with only around one-third implementing both. Implementation of a national quality-of-care plan was associated with higher healthy life expectancy (1.68 additional years; punadjusted = 0.033, p = 0.144), a lower probability of premature death from cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes and chronic respiratory diseases (−3.33 percentage points; punadjusted = 0.049, p = 0.144), and reduced under-five mortality (−4.06 deaths per 1,000 live births; punadjusted = 0.023, p = 0.144). Implementing a greater number of national policies was associated with small increases in healthy life expectancy (0.29 years per additional policy; punadjusted = 0.043, p = 0.167) and lower under-five mortality (−0.72 deaths per 1,000 live births per additional policy; punadjusted = 0.018, p = 0.162), while associations with other outcomes were weaker and often non-significant.  Conclusion: Given the ecological cross-sectional design, limited adjustment and multiple testing, these findings should be treated as exploratory and non-causal and used as a basis for more detailed longitudinal research.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -