Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 55 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Experimental reproduction numbers disentangle vaccine effects on susceptibility and infectiousness during H5N1 transmission in geese

  1. 1Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut

Abstract

Vaccination against high pathogenicity avian influenza virus (HPAIV) is increasingly used to protect poultry, but vaccine performance is commonly inferred from clinical protection and virus shedding rather than measured transmission. We asked whether reproduction numbers from controlled transmission experiments can quantify how vaccination changes susceptibility and infectiousness. Domestic geese were prime-boost vaccinated with an H5 clade 2.3.4.4b RNA-replicon vaccine and challenged with homologous HPAIV H5N1. Replicated seeder-sentinel groups represented transmission among unvaccinated animals, to vaccinated contacts, and from vaccinated breakthrough-infected animals. Vaccinated directly challenged geese remained clinically protected although all became RT-qPCR-positive. Estimated reproduction numbers were R0=4.7 (95% CI, 2.8-8.0) among unvaccinated geese, Rs=2.6 (1.6-4.5) for transmission to vaccinated contacts, Ri=3.7 (2.0-6.8) for transmission from vaccinated infected geese, and Rvacc=2.0 (0.8-4.9) for a fully vaccinated population. Vaccination reduced transmission but did not reduce the point estimate for Rvacc below one under these intensive exposure conditions. Vaccinated infected geese also shed substantially less viral RNA, whereas the estimated reduction in infectiousness was more modest, indicating that RNA shedding alone may not reliably predict transmission reduction. Experimental reproduction numbers therefore provide a direct population-level complement to conventional vaccine endpoints and separate effects on susceptibility from effects on onward transmission.

Related

  1. Lactotransferrin gene functional polymorphisms do not influence susceptibility to human immunodeficiency virus-1 mother-to-child transmission in different ethnic groups
    Luisa Zupin, Vania Polesello, Antonio Victor Campos Coelho +3
    Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo CruzPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull text6 citedMicrobiologyHAL
  2. Seasonal and annual variation in Borrelia garinii infectiousness in a wild bird
    Jens Zarka, Dieter Heylen, Manoj Fonville +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyCrossref
  3. Inter-species transmission of Chlamydophila psittaci from broiler chickens to ducks, turkeys, pigeons, and quails: an experimental study
    Ahmed M. E. Hegazy, Amira M. Morsy, Heba M. Salem +7
    Frontiers in Veterinary SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyPMC
  4. An ecological model of masting reproduction matches empirical dynamics
    M. Salehzadeh, J. M. Stockie, A. MacPherson
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEcologybioRxiv
  5. Rapid evolution of learning and reproduction in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster
    E. L. Behrman, T. J. Kawecki, P. Schmidt
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull text3 citedEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{piesche2026experimental,
  title = {{Experimental reproduction numbers disentangle vaccine effects on susceptibility and infectiousness during H5N1 transmission in geese}},
  author = {R. Piesche and J. Schulz and M. Höhle and M. Beer and C. Grund and T. Harder and J. Gonzales},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.02.748824},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.02.748824v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Experimental reproduction numbers disentangle vaccine effects on susceptibility and infectiousness during H5N1 transmission in geese
AU  - R. Piesche
AU  - J. Schulz
AU  - M. Höhle
AU  - M. Beer
AU  - C. Grund
AU  - T. Harder
AU  - J. Gonzales
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/02
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.02.748824
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.02.748824v1
AB  - Vaccination against high pathogenicity avian influenza virus (HPAIV) is increasingly used to protect poultry, but vaccine performance is commonly inferred from clinical protection and virus shedding rather than measured transmission. We asked whether reproduction numbers from controlled transmission experiments can quantify how vaccination changes susceptibility and infectiousness. Domestic geese were prime-boost vaccinated with an H5 clade 2.3.4.4b RNA-replicon vaccine and challenged with homologous HPAIV H5N1. Replicated seeder-sentinel groups represented transmission among unvaccinated animals, to vaccinated contacts, and from vaccinated breakthrough-infected animals. Vaccinated directly challenged geese remained clinically protected although all became RT-qPCR-positive. Estimated reproduction numbers were R0=4.7 (95% CI, 2.8-8.0) among unvaccinated geese, Rs=2.6 (1.6-4.5) for transmission to vaccinated contacts, Ri=3.7 (2.0-6.8) for transmission from vaccinated infected geese, and Rvacc=2.0 (0.8-4.9) for a fully vaccinated population. Vaccination reduced transmission but did not reduce the point estimate for Rvacc below one under these intensive exposure conditions. Vaccinated infected geese also shed substantially less viral RNA, whereas the estimated reduction in infectiousness was more modest, indicating that RNA shedding alone may not reliably predict transmission reduction. Experimental reproduction numbers therefore provide a direct population-level complement to conventional vaccine endpoints and separate effects on susceptibility from effects on onward transmission.
ER  -