Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Uncertainty Quantification for Topological Treatment Effects

Abstract

We present a unified framework for uncertainty quantification over filtration scale, extending the topological average treatment effect (TATE) analysis of \citet{kim-lee} to conditional mean confidence and individual effect prediction. For the conditional topological average treatment effect (CTATE), we derive multiplier confidence bands at a fixed covariate value, simultaneous over filtration scale, and prove validity in a correctly specified finite-dimensional regression regime, with explicit control of smoothing bias and nuisance-estimation error. For the individual topological treatment effect (ITTE), we integrate existing weighted and functional split-conformal methods to obtain finite-sample marginal prediction coverage under known target-to-calibration likelihood ratios, with a total-variation bound for estimated ratios. We also extend the current TATE silhouette stability analysis to the diagram-independent bound |Φr(D)−Φr(D')|∞ ≤ (1+2r)W1(D,D') for r≥1, recovering the known r=1 constant, and propagate diagram approximation error to prediction bands. The installable Python library \texttt{tcda\_uq} integrates mean confidence, individual prediction, and topological preprocessing, with tutorials and reproduction materials. Simulations and a PACCE lesion-measurement application illustrate the distinct coverage targets and the importance of declaring the target population.

Related

  1. Adaptive Uncertainty Quantification on Simplicial Complexes with Conformalized Simplicial Neural Networks
    Lekun Wang, Jaidev Goel, Yulia R. Gel +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Subjective Risk Decomposition: A New View for Uncertainty Quantification
    Raghad Alamri, Michele Caprio, Gavin Brown
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Bagged Martingale Posteriors: Calibrated Uncertainty Quantification for Predictive Resampling
    Hui Wang, Edwin Fong, David T. Frazier
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Conformal Uncertainty Quantification Guarantees for Neural Operators
    Tom Stent, Nicolas Boullé
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingProbabilityarXiv
  5. OpenTURNS: A Python package for uncertainty quantification
    Michaël Baudin, Anne Dutfoy, Régis Lebrun +6
    Journal of Open Source SoftwarePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsGeneral physicsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{souto2026uncertainty,
  title = {{Uncertainty Quantification for Topological Treatment Effects}},
  author = {Hugo G. Souto and Ioannis Diamantis},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.41593},
  eprint = {2610.41593},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41593},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Uncertainty Quantification for Topological Treatment Effects
AU  - Hugo G. Souto
AU  - Ioannis Diamantis
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.41593
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41593
AB  - We present a unified framework for uncertainty quantification over filtration scale, extending the topological average treatment effect (TATE) analysis of \citet{kim-lee} to conditional mean confidence and individual effect prediction. For the conditional topological average treatment effect (CTATE), we derive multiplier confidence bands at a fixed covariate value, simultaneous over filtration scale, and prove validity in a correctly specified finite-dimensional regression regime, with explicit control of smoothing bias and nuisance-estimation error. For the individual topological treatment effect (ITTE), we integrate existing weighted and functional split-conformal methods to obtain finite-sample marginal prediction coverage under known target-to-calibration likelihood ratios, with a total-variation bound for estimated ratios. We also extend the current TATE silhouette stability analysis to the diagram-independent bound |Φ_r(D)−Φ_r(D')|_∞ ≤ (1+2r)W_1(D,D') for r≥1, recovering the known r=1 constant, and propagate diagram approximation error to prediction bands. The installable Python library \texttt{tcda\_uq} integrates mean confidence, individual prediction, and topological preprocessing, with tutorials and reproduction materials. Simulations and a PACCE lesion-measurement application illustrate the distinct coverage targets and the importance of declaring the target population.
ER  -