Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,230 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Subgroup Analysis of Pooled Phase 3 Efficacy Data From Two Randomized Trials of Gepotidacin Versus Nitrofurantoin in Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections (EAGLE-2 and EAGLE-3) Including Participants With Uropathogens Not-Susceptible to Nitrofurantoin

Abstract

Background: Two phase 3 trials (EAGLE-2 [NCT04020341]/EAGLE-3 [NCT04187144]) demonstrated the efficacy of gepotidacin, a novel, first-in-class triazaacenaphthylene antibacterial, versus nitrofurantoin for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs). Using pooled data, we assessed gepotidacin efficacy across clinically important subgroups, including participants with nitrofurantoin not-susceptible (NTF-NS; ie, resistant, intermediate or no interpretation) uropathogens.

Methods: Female participants aged ≥12 years with uUTI received gepotidacin (1500 mg) or nitrofurantoin (100 mg), both twice daily for 5 days. Therapeutic success at test-of-cure (day 10–13) was defined as combined complete symptom resolution (clinical success) and reduction of baseline qualifying uropathogens from ≥105 to <103 CFU/mL (microbiological success), without other systemic antibacterials. Response rates at test-of-cure were descriptively summarized in the pooled microbiological intent-to-treat (micro-ITT) nitrofurantoin-susceptible (NTF-S) and NTF-NS populations, and across prespecified subgroups.

Results: In the micro-ITT NTF-S population, treatment differences (in favor of gepotidacin) [95% confidence interval] for therapeutic, clinical and microbiological success were: 9.6% [4.1, 15.2], 2.8% [−2.4, 8.1], and 10.4% [5.2, 15.6]. Corresponding treatment differences were higher in the micro-ITT NTF-NS population: 20.8% [9.2, 32.4], 10.3% [−1.4, 22.1], 20.7% [9.2, 32.3]. In both of these populations, gepotidacin success rates (all endpoints) were similar to or higher than nitrofurantoin across prespecified subgroups at higher risk for antimicrobial resistant uropathogens (age >50 years, history of recurrent uUTI, diabetes, mild renal impairment, extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing or fluoroquinolone-resistant uropathogens).

Conclusions: Gepotidacin demonstrated efficacy with generally higher therapeutic success rates versus nitrofurantoin in participants with NTF-S and NTF-NS uropathogens, and across a range of key subgroups.

Related

  1. Synergistic effects of combined exposure to hydroquinone and nitrofurantoin in T24 bladder cells: an in vitro toxicology study with implications for risk assessment.
    Ana Huđek Turković, Željka Stanečić, Ana Butorac +7
    Arhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologijuPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  2. Digital Twin-Based Risk Stratification Integrating Aortic Shape and Wall Mechanics in Acute Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection
    M. Liu, Z. Zhou, Y. Du +6
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textCardiovascular medicinemedRxiv
  3. Subclinical Cardiovascular Adaptation in Uncomplicated Monochorionic Twin Pregnancies: Echocardiographic and Cardiac Biomarker Findings
    Marta Campillo Ajenjo, Beatriz Herrero Ruiz, Laura Sotillo Mallo +8
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of ESBLs-producing uropathogens in kidney transplant recipients in northern Iran.
    Raheleh Sheikhi, Mojgan Sigarchi, Ali Monfared +8
    Caspian journal of internal medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Multi-drug resistance and multiple antibiotic resistance index of uropathogens in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with urinary tract infections
    Priyal Kalola, Hemantkumar Patadia, Ankita Priyadarshini
    Annals of Clinical Microbiology and AntimicrobialsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{sheets2026subgroup,
  title = {{Subgroup Analysis of Pooled Phase 3 Efficacy Data From Two Randomized Trials of Gepotidacin Versus Nitrofurantoin in Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections (EAGLE-2 and EAGLE-3) Including Participants With Uropathogens Not-Susceptible to Nitrofurantoin}},
  author = {Amanda Sheets and Jeremy Dennison and Jennifer H Han and Sarah Watts and Caroline Perry and Nicole E Scangarella-Oman and Deborah Butler and John Breton and Thomas M Hooton and Helen Millns and Matthew Helgeson and Salim Janmohamed},
  journal = {Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1093/cid/ciag408},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag408},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Subgroup Analysis of Pooled Phase 3 Efficacy Data From Two Randomized Trials of Gepotidacin Versus Nitrofurantoin in Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections (EAGLE-2 and EAGLE-3) Including Participants With Uropathogens Not-Susceptible to Nitrofurantoin
AU  - Amanda Sheets
AU  - Jeremy Dennison
AU  - Jennifer H Han
AU  - Sarah Watts
AU  - Caroline Perry
AU  - Nicole E Scangarella-Oman
AU  - Deborah Butler
AU  - John Breton
AU  - Thomas M Hooton
AU  - Helen Millns
AU  - Matthew Helgeson
AU  - Salim Janmohamed
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/08
JO  - Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
DO  - 10.1093/cid/ciag408
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag408
AB  - Background: Two phase 3 trials (EAGLE-2 [NCT04020341]/EAGLE-3 [NCT04187144]) demonstrated the efficacy of gepotidacin, a novel, first-in-class triazaacenaphthylene antibacterial, versus nitrofurantoin for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs). Using pooled data, we assessed gepotidacin efficacy across clinically important subgroups, including participants with nitrofurantoin not-susceptible (NTF-NS; ie, resistant, intermediate or no interpretation) uropathogens.  Methods: Female participants aged ≥12 years with uUTI received gepotidacin (1500 mg) or nitrofurantoin (100 mg), both twice daily for 5 days. Therapeutic success at test-of-cure (day 10–13) was defined as combined complete symptom resolution (clinical success) and reduction of baseline qualifying uropathogens from ≥105 to <103 CFU/mL (microbiological success), without other systemic antibacterials. Response rates at test-of-cure were descriptively summarized in the pooled microbiological intent-to-treat (micro-ITT) nitrofurantoin-susceptible (NTF-S) and NTF-NS populations, and across prespecified subgroups.  Results: In the micro-ITT NTF-S population, treatment differences (in favor of gepotidacin) [95% confidence interval] for therapeutic, clinical and microbiological success were: 9.6% [4.1, 15.2], 2.8% [−2.4, 8.1], and 10.4% [5.2, 15.6]. Corresponding treatment differences were higher in the micro-ITT NTF-NS population: 20.8% [9.2, 32.4], 10.3% [−1.4, 22.1], 20.7% [9.2, 32.3]. In both of these populations, gepotidacin success rates (all endpoints) were similar to or higher than nitrofurantoin across prespecified subgroups at higher risk for antimicrobial resistant uropathogens (age >50 years, history of recurrent uUTI, diabetes, mild renal impairment, extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing or fluoroquinolone-resistant uropathogens).  Conclusions: Gepotidacin demonstrated efficacy with generally higher therapeutic success rates versus nitrofurantoin in participants with NTF-S and NTF-NS uropathogens, and across a range of key subgroups.
SN  - 1058-4838
SN  - 1537-6591
ER  -