From quantum reservoirs to quantum extreme learning machines through a nearest-neighbor spin chain with tunable quantum memory
Abstract
Quantum Reservoir Computing (QRC) processes temporal data by retaining a memory of past inputs in the recurrent state of a quantum system, whereas a Quantum Extreme-Learning Machine (QELM) discards that memory, resetting the system at every step so that only the most recent input shapes the response. The two are usually treated as separate computational paradigms. We show that they are the two limits of a single architecture, connected by the input-encoding length, that is, the number of qubits overwritten with fresh data at each step. When a single qubit is re-encoded the system operates as a standard QRC, when the whole register is re-encoded it operates as a QELM, and intermediate lengths interpolate between them. The overwritten qubits hold the recent past in an explicit register, while the remaining qubits are never reset and carry older inputs forward in their evolving quantum state, so the encoding length redistributes memory between explicit and recurrent storage at fixed system size. Tuning the reservoir Hamiltonian and the evolution time with Bayesian optimization at each encoding length, we find that recurrent quantum memory is essential when a task must reach far into the past, and dispensable when the relevant history is short, where the memoryless reset limit already suffices. For every task the best reservoirs operate at the edge of chaos, where they perform as well as a densely connected reservoir with random all-to-all couplings of the same size, indicating that what temporal processing requires is the dynamical regime rather than the connectivity.
Related
- When Can Quantum Extreme Learning Machines Replace Quantum Reservoirs?
- Generative quantum extreme learning machines
- Extreme-Scale Ising Machines with Cluster Mean-Field Theory
- Photonic Time-Delayed Quantum Extreme Learning Machine
- Quantum extreme learning for forecasting experimental chaotic electronic circuits
BibTeX
@misc{ramonescandell2026from,
title = {{From quantum reservoirs to quantum extreme learning machines through a nearest-neighbor spin chain with tunable quantum memory}},
author = {Carlos Ramon-Escandell and Arnau Riera and Marcin Płodzień},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.28440},
eprint = {2608.28440},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28440},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - From quantum reservoirs to quantum extreme learning machines through a nearest-neighbor spin chain with tunable quantum memory
AU - Carlos Ramon-Escandell
AU - Arnau Riera
AU - Marcin Płodzień
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/28
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.28440
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28440
AB - Quantum Reservoir Computing (QRC) processes temporal data by retaining a memory of past inputs in the recurrent state of a quantum system, whereas a Quantum Extreme-Learning Machine (QELM) discards that memory, resetting the system at every step so that only the most recent input shapes the response. The two are usually treated as separate computational paradigms. We show that they are the two limits of a single architecture, connected by the input-encoding length, that is, the number of qubits overwritten with fresh data at each step. When a single qubit is re-encoded the system operates as a standard QRC, when the whole register is re-encoded it operates as a QELM, and intermediate lengths interpolate between them. The overwritten qubits hold the recent past in an explicit register, while the remaining qubits are never reset and carry older inputs forward in their evolving quantum state, so the encoding length redistributes memory between explicit and recurrent storage at fixed system size. Tuning the reservoir Hamiltonian and the evolution time with Bayesian optimization at each encoding length, we find that recurrent quantum memory is essential when a task must reach far into the past, and dispensable when the relevant history is short, where the memoryless reset limit already suffices. For every task the best reservoirs operate at the edge of chaos, where they perform as well as a densely connected reservoir with random all-to-all couplings of the same size, indicating that what temporal processing requires is the dynamical regime rather than the connectivity.
ER -