Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

When Can Quantum Extreme Learning Machines Replace Quantum Reservoirs?

Abstract

Quantum reservoir computers (QRCs) retain information from earlier inputs, whereas reset-window quantum extreme learning machines (QELMs) start afresh and receive only a recent input window. We establish when this window can replace the reservoir's memory. Under our stated assumptions and with exact expectation values, sufficiently expressive QELMs can reproduce reservoir outputs arbitrarily accurately as their windows grow precisely when the influence of the omitted past becomes uniformly negligible. However, longer windows do not always solve the problem. We construct a simple two-qubit reservoir that performs temporal recall exactly, while every fixed-window predictor faces the same positive worst-case error over unbounded delays, regardless of model capacity. Analytical benchmarks and simulations distinguish missing history from limited features and finite measurements. The central conclusion is simple: better representations can improve how available information is used, but cannot recover a past the model never receives.

Related

  1. From quantum reservoirs to quantum extreme learning machines through a nearest-neighbor spin chain with tunable quantum memory
    Carlos Ramon-Escandell, Arnau Riera, Marcin Płodzień
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Generative quantum extreme learning machines
    Marcin Płodzień
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Extreme-Scale Ising Machines with Cluster Mean-Field Theory
    Xiuqi Zhang, Shuvro Chowdhury, Shaila Niazi +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
  4. Photonic Time-Delayed Quantum Extreme Learning Machine
    Ekaterina Protsenko, Caterina Vigliar, Francesco Da Ros
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Quantum extreme learning for forecasting experimental chaotic electronic circuits
    Mohammad Sharifian, Qingyu Li, Chiranjib Mukhopadhyay +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{baumann2026when,
  title = {{When Can Quantum Extreme Learning Machines Replace Quantum Reservoirs?}},
  author = {Markus Baumann and Gerhard Stenzel and Jonas Stein and Claudia Linnhoff-Popien},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.31027},
  eprint = {2609.31027},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31027},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - When Can Quantum Extreme Learning Machines Replace Quantum Reservoirs?
AU  - Markus Baumann
AU  - Gerhard Stenzel
AU  - Jonas Stein
AU  - Claudia Linnhoff-Popien
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.31027
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31027
AB  - Quantum reservoir computers (QRCs) retain information from earlier inputs, whereas reset-window quantum extreme learning machines (QELMs) start afresh and receive only a recent input window. We establish when this window can replace the reservoir's memory. Under our stated assumptions and with exact expectation values, sufficiently expressive QELMs can reproduce reservoir outputs arbitrarily accurately as their windows grow precisely when the influence of the omitted past becomes uniformly negligible. However, longer windows do not always solve the problem. We construct a simple two-qubit reservoir that performs temporal recall exactly, while every fixed-window predictor faces the same positive worst-case error over unbounded delays, regardless of model capacity. Analytical benchmarks and simulations distinguish missing history from limited features and finite measurements. The central conclusion is simple: better representations can improve how available information is used, but cannot recover a past the model never receives.
ER  -