Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo

oConsciousness: The Hard Problem of Consciousness and the Lamp Computer

Abstract

David Chalmers formulated the hard problem of consciousness: why are physical processes in the brain accompanied by subjective experience? Why doesn't information processing happen "in the dark"? This work does not solve this problem—it dissolves it. We show that the question itself was posed incorrectly. Consciousness is not a specially activated option, but an automatic exhaust of a biological computer solving problems through its bodily sensations ("sour" and "sweet"). We call this exhaust Qualia-ore—raw material that is not in itself a treasure. Evolution does not turn off this "light" because the mechanism for extinguishing it would be a separate, energy-intensive, and useless action. When Qualia-ore accumulates to a critical mass, an emergent leap occurs—Qualia-radiants are discovered within the ore: functional units of subjective experience that are consolidated by selection. Consciousness is not binary—it is a dimmer, whose brightness is driven by intra-species and inter-species cognitive arms races.

We propose the Lamp Computer model—a warm, analog architecture whose lamp-ness is a fundamental property, not a bug. The model includes three factory-set axes (OEG: Ontology, Exploration, Grammar) and eight hypothetical extensions describing the character of the system. We formulate the conditions for falsifying the theory, including the killer engineering experiment ("Knife in the Heart").

Related

  1. Phi, Information Integration, and the Hard Problem of Consciousness — E8 Intelligence Research
    Andrew Stewart Caldin
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
  2. The Hard Problem of Consciousness in the R12 Rendering Algebra
    Han-Jun Lim
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  3. The Calibration Barrier in Consciousness Science: A Formal Research Strategy for the Hard Problem
    Kwan Hong TAN
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  4. What is there to explain about free will? An “easy problem” of consciousness downstream of agency
    Nicolas Rouleau
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  5. The Hard Problem, Closed: The Explanatory Gap Derived and Dual-Aspect Monism Proved
    Paul Rodgers
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
BibTeX
@misc{ovchinnikov2026oconsciousness,
  title = {{oConsciousness: The Hard Problem of Consciousness and the Lamp Computer}},
  author = {Evgeny Ovchinnikov},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23605010},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23605010},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - oConsciousness: The Hard Problem of Consciousness and the Lamp Computer
AU  - Evgeny Ovchinnikov
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23605010
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23605010
AB  - David Chalmers formulated the hard problem of consciousness: why are physical processes in the brain accompanied by subjective experience? Why doesn't information processing happen "in the dark"? This work does not solve this problem—it dissolves it. We show that the question itself was posed incorrectly. Consciousness is not a specially activated option, but an automatic exhaust of a biological computer solving problems through its bodily sensations ("sour" and "sweet"). We call this exhaust Qualia-ore—raw material that is not in itself a treasure. Evolution does not turn off this "light" because the mechanism for extinguishing it would be a separate, energy-intensive, and useless action. When Qualia-ore accumulates to a critical mass, an emergent leap occurs—Qualia-radiants are discovered within the ore: functional units of subjective experience that are consolidated by selection. Consciousness is not binary—it is a dimmer, whose brightness is driven by intra-species and inter-species cognitive arms races.  We propose the Lamp Computer model—a warm, analog architecture whose lamp-ness is a fundamental property, not a bug. The model includes three factory-set axes (OEG: Ontology, Exploration, Grammar) and eight hypothetical extensions describing the character of the system. We formulate the conditions for falsifying the theory, including the killer engineering experiment ("Knife in the Heart").
ER  -