Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Upper Bounds for CSP Non-redundancy via Locally Decodable Codes

Abstract

In the study of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), the non-redundancy of a relation measures the maximum number of clauses in a CSP instance which can be logically independent. In the last few years, CSP non-redundancy has found a number of applications including in query complexity, sparsification, kernelization and streaming. In this paper, we present a novel technique for upper-bounding the non-redundancy of some relations using locally decodable codes (LDCs) and locally correctable codes (LCCs). More precisely, known limitations on the structure of 2-query LDCs and LCCs can be translated into limitations on the size of certain non-redundant CSP instances. This technique builds on a technique used by Brakensiek and Guruswami [STOC 2025] to bound non-redundancy via techniques from matching vector codes. Using LDCs and LCCs, we give improved upper bounds on non-redundancy of the BCK predicate pioneered by Bessiere, Carbonnel, and Katsirelos [AAAI 2020] as well as its well-studied Boolean variant. We also give the first example of a Boolean predicate whose non-redundancy is provably not of the form nk± o(1) for some positive integer k.

Related

  1. Lower Bounds for Adaptive Relaxed Locally Decodable Codes via the Capped Horvitz--Thompson Estimator
    Guy Goldberg, Tom Gur, Sidhant Saraogi
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  2. Amortized Relaxed Locally Decodable Codes
    Jeremiah Blocki, Justin Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  3. Lower Bounds for all List-Decodable Deletion Codes
    Andrew D. Lin
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. Data Protection in Function-Correcting Symbol-Pair Codes: Redundancy Bounds and Protection Profiles
    Anamika Singh, Abhay Kumar Singh
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  5. Alphabet-Dependent Bounds for Pure Quantum (r,ρ)-Locally Recoverable Codes
    Vijay Kumar, Ramakrishna Bandi
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{brakensiek2026upper,
  title = {{Upper Bounds for CSP Non-redundancy via Locally Decodable Codes}},
  author = {Joshua Brakensiek and David Conlon and Venkatesan Guruswami and Xiaoyu He and Jiaxi Nie and Maya Sankar and Hung-Hsun Hans Yu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.38664},
  eprint = {2610.38664},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38664},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Upper Bounds for CSP Non-redundancy via Locally Decodable Codes
AU  - Joshua Brakensiek
AU  - David Conlon
AU  - Venkatesan Guruswami
AU  - Xiaoyu He
AU  - Jiaxi Nie
AU  - Maya Sankar
AU  - Hung-Hsun Hans Yu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.38664
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38664
AB  - In the study of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), the non-redundancy of a relation measures the maximum number of clauses in a CSP instance which can be logically independent. In the last few years, CSP non-redundancy has found a number of applications including in query complexity, sparsification, kernelization and streaming. In this paper, we present a novel technique for upper-bounding the non-redundancy of some relations using locally decodable codes (LDCs) and locally correctable codes (LCCs). More precisely, known limitations on the structure of 2-query LDCs and LCCs can be translated into limitations on the size of certain non-redundant CSP instances. This technique builds on a technique used by Brakensiek and Guruswami [STOC 2025] to bound non-redundancy via techniques from matching vector codes. Using LDCs and LCCs, we give improved upper bounds on non-redundancy of the BCK predicate pioneered by Bessiere, Carbonnel, and Katsirelos [AAAI 2020] as well as its well-studied Boolean variant. We also give the first example of a Boolean predicate whose non-redundancy is provably not of the form n^k± o(1) for some positive integer k.
ER  -