Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Adaptive control of pool-type research nuclear reactors: theory limits, pragmatic actuation constraints, and realized performance and adaptation

Abstract

Adaptive control is attractive for nuclear reactors expected to operate predictably with extensive automation or bounded autonomy under dynamic electric and nonelectric demands, even as reactor and actuator characteristics depart from their nominal values. Standard adaptive control results, however, assume fixed matched dynamics and an input applied as computed. In this work we evaluate a recent model reference adaptive control with linear quadratic regulation (MRAC-LQR) construction on the nonlinear point-kinetics model of Purdue University Reactor Number One (PUR-1), with a moving physical reference, nonlinear rod worth, rate and travel limits, quantization, deadband, and optional power-only state reconstruction. An exact sampled decomposition separates matched adaptation from observer, command processing, actuator realization, independent reactivity, and unmatched-dynamics residuals. Numerical results emphasize compatible reference trajectories, plant parameter variation, response to unexpected rod motion, and actuator duty. Across sampled plants, one unchanged nominal design yields closely aligned responses through adaptively calculated, plant-dependent actuation histories, illustrating both the premise and the theory limits of adaptation at a pool-reactor scale that can support follow-on experimental verification and progression toward higher-consequence nuclear applications.

Related

  1. Adaptive Predefined-Time Output-Feedback Control of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Dead-Zone Actuation via Fractional-Power Feedback
    Nan Wang, Rui Meng, Fazhan Tao +1
    Fractal and FractionalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Analysis & PDEsCrossref
  2. Sustainable Cloud-Fog-Edge Systems for Smart Buildings: Algorithmic Adaptation under Memory Constraints and Dynamic Orchestration Strategies
    Mamadou Sow, Christophe Cerin
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  3. Adaptive dynamic programming using Lyapunov function constraints
    Thomas Göhrt, Pavel Osinenko, Stefan Streif
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textDynamical systemsOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Performance Evaluation of an Adaptive Quadrature and a Double Exponential Formula Using Arbitrary-Precision Floating-Point Arithmetic
    Tomonori Kouya
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  5. An Adaptive Symplectic Proximal Point Algorithm: Faster Convergence and Improved Numerical Performance
    Yi Zhang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{pylorof2026adaptive,
  title = {{Adaptive control of pool-type research nuclear reactors: theory limits, pragmatic actuation constraints, and realized performance and adaptation}},
  author = {Dimitrios Pylorof and Linyu Lin},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.05786},
  eprint = {2610.05786},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05786},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Adaptive control of pool-type research nuclear reactors: theory limits, pragmatic actuation constraints, and realized performance and adaptation
AU  - Dimitrios Pylorof
AU  - Linyu Lin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.05786
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05786
AB  - Adaptive control is attractive for nuclear reactors expected to operate predictably with extensive automation or bounded autonomy under dynamic electric and nonelectric demands, even as reactor and actuator characteristics depart from their nominal values. Standard adaptive control results, however, assume fixed matched dynamics and an input applied as computed. In this work we evaluate a recent model reference adaptive control with linear quadratic regulation (MRAC-LQR) construction on the nonlinear point-kinetics model of Purdue University Reactor Number One (PUR-1), with a moving physical reference, nonlinear rod worth, rate and travel limits, quantization, deadband, and optional power-only state reconstruction. An exact sampled decomposition separates matched adaptation from observer, command processing, actuator realization, independent reactivity, and unmatched-dynamics residuals. Numerical results emphasize compatible reference trajectories, plant parameter variation, response to unexpected rod motion, and actuator duty. Across sampled plants, one unchanged nominal design yields closely aligned responses through adaptively calculated, plant-dependent actuation histories, illustrating both the premise and the theory limits of adaptation at a pool-reactor scale that can support follow-on experimental verification and progression toward higher-consequence nuclear applications.
ER  -