Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Assessing reinforcement learning and vigor with an online decision-making battery

  1. 1Karolinska Institutet

Abstract

Reinforcement learning and vigor are two fundamental aspects of decision-making modulated by dopamine. Although vigor is highly relevant for mood disorders, it has been overlooked by previous batteries characterizing decision-making abilities. We developed a test battery with two RL tasks (RL/working memory, go/no-go task) and two vigor tasks (physical effort discounting, foraging task) and administered it to an online community sample (N = 162). We used computational modeling and factor analysis to identify two factors reflecting RL and vigor. The RL factor reflected participants' general decision-making ability, while vigor corresponded to a motivational propensity to obtain rewards. Both factors demonstrated moderately strong test-retest reliability (ICC(2,1) = .65 and .67, respectively) over a one-to-two-week interval. Moreover, both factors were meaningfully related to self-report scales. The RL and vigor factors were negatively and positively associated with mania, respectively, although further analyses revealed that vigor was not fully independent of RL. Neither factor was significantly associated with depression symptoms. Collectively, we present preliminary evidence that vigor may represent a separate factor from RL in line with the putative dopamine hypothesis, paving the way for future longitudinal assessments of RL and vigor in mood disorders.

Related

  1. Impaired Reinforcement Learning Underlying Explore-Exploit Decision Making in Theft Recidivists
    Y. Goto, S. Yoshino, C. Kita +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  2. Effort and substance use: differentiating tobacco use through reinforcement learning of effort based decision making
    Kasey P. Spry, Jazmyne James, Alison H. Oliveto +3
    Journal of Computational NeurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePMC
  3. Modeling decision dynamics disentangles working memory, cognitive control and reinforcement learning and reveals clinical differences
    Krishn Bera, Alexander Fengler, Megan A. Boudewyn +9
    PLOS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePLOS
  4. A novel methodology for assessing reinforcement choice in primates under human care
    M. I. Leiva, R. K. Griffin, T. R. Lewis
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textZoology & animal behaviourbioRxiv
  5. Assessing seabird and shorebird vulnerability to offshore wind farms in Brazil: A decision-support framework for environmental licensing
    N. Horn, G. T. Nunes
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEcologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{wenke2026assessing,
  title = {{Assessing reinforcement learning and vigor with an online decision-making battery}},
  author = {S. Wenke and T. Granwald and A. Ferrante and M. Nilsson and I. Ekström and G. Papenberg and M. Guitart-Masip},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.30.763028},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.30.763028v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Assessing reinforcement learning and vigor with an online decision-making battery
AU  - S. Wenke
AU  - T. Granwald
AU  - A. Ferrante
AU  - M. Nilsson
AU  - I. Ekström
AU  - G. Papenberg
AU  - M. Guitart-Masip
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.30.763028
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.30.763028v1
AB  - Reinforcement learning and vigor are two fundamental aspects of decision-making modulated by dopamine. Although vigor is highly relevant for mood disorders, it has been overlooked by previous batteries characterizing decision-making abilities. We developed a test battery with two RL tasks (RL/working memory, go/no-go task) and two vigor tasks (physical effort discounting, foraging task) and administered it to an online community sample (N = 162). We used computational modeling and factor analysis to identify two factors reflecting RL and vigor. The RL factor reflected participants' general decision-making ability, while vigor corresponded to a motivational propensity to obtain rewards. Both factors demonstrated moderately strong test-retest reliability (ICC(2,1) = .65 and .67, respectively) over a one-to-two-week interval. Moreover, both factors were meaningfully related to self-report scales. The RL and vigor factors were negatively and positively associated with mania, respectively, although further analyses revealed that vigor was not fully independent of RL. Neither factor was significantly associated with depression symptoms. Collectively, we present preliminary evidence that vigor may represent a separate factor from RL in line with the putative dopamine hypothesis, paving the way for future longitudinal assessments of RL and vigor in mood disorders.
ER  -