Patient-reported outcome measures for depressive symptoms in adults with spinal cord injury: a COSMIN systematic review
- 1Department of Spine and Orthopedics, Tianyou Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- 21Department of Spine and Orthopedics, Tianyou Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- 3Liyuan Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the measurement properties of patient-reported measures of depressive symptoms in adults with spinal cord injury and inform their purpose-specific selection and interpretation in clinical and research settings.
Design: Systematic review.
Subjects/Patients: Adults with traumatic or non-traumatic spinal cord injury.
Methods: 10 databases were searched from inception to 25 June 2026, with reference checking, citation tracking, instrument websites, and targeted searches. Two reviewers independently selected reports, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, rated measurement properties, and graded certainty using current international guidance for outcome measurement instruments.
Results: 28 reports evaluated 27 separately scored versions, forms, or depression subscales from 14 instrument families. The Spinal Cord Injury–Quality of Life Depression Item Bank had the strongest condition-specific development and internal-structure evidence, but evidence gaps and insufficient measurement invariance prevented recommendation. The English Patient Health Questionnaire-9 had sufficient case-finding evidence but insufficient structural validity for interpreting its conventional total score as a clearly unidimensional severity measure. The English depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale showed sufficient structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity. Evidence for measurement error and responsiveness was scarce.
Conclusion: No measure had sufficiently complete evidence for routine use across screening, severity assessment, and change measurement.
Related
- Development and validation of a prognostic tool for antenatal depressive symptoms: Statistical analysis plan for a two-stage model integrating self-reported and biomarker measures
- Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms Among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Attending a Tertiary Pulmonary Clinic in Damascus, Syria: A Cross-Sectional Study of Spirometric and Patient-Reported Correlates
- Comparison of four breast lymphoedema patient reported outcome measures in women following breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy: examination of frequencies of symptoms and measurement properties.
- Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.
- Self-reported pain, depressive symptoms and risk for cardiovascular diseases
BibTeX
@article{lu2026patientreported,
title = {{Patient-reported outcome measures for depressive symptoms in adults with spinal cord injury: a COSMIN systematic review}},
author = {Runlin Lu and Yixin Dun and Lingzhi Li and Bing Hu and Caihong Zhang},
journal = {Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.2340/jrm.v58.46626},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.46626},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Patient-reported outcome measures for depressive symptoms in adults with spinal cord injury: a COSMIN systematic review
AU - Runlin Lu
AU - Yixin Dun
AU - Lingzhi Li
AU - Bing Hu
AU - Caihong Zhang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
JO - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
DO - 10.2340/jrm.v58.46626
UR - https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.46626
AB - Objective: To evaluate the measurement properties of patient-reported measures of depressive symptoms in adults with spinal cord injury and inform their purpose-specific selection and interpretation in clinical and research settings. Design: Systematic review. Subjects/Patients: Adults with traumatic or non-traumatic spinal cord injury. Methods: 10 databases were searched from inception to 25 June 2026, with reference checking, citation tracking, instrument websites, and targeted searches. Two reviewers independently selected reports, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, rated measurement properties, and graded certainty using current international guidance for outcome measurement instruments. Results: 28 reports evaluated 27 separately scored versions, forms, or depression subscales from 14 instrument families. The Spinal Cord Injury–Quality of Life Depression Item Bank had the strongest condition-specific development and internal-structure evidence, but evidence gaps and insufficient measurement invariance prevented recommendation. The English Patient Health Questionnaire-9 had sufficient case-finding evidence but insufficient structural validity for interpreting its conventional total score as a clearly unidimensional severity measure. The English depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale showed sufficient structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity. Evidence for measurement error and responsiveness was scarce. Conclusion: No measure had sufficiently complete evidence for routine use across screening, severity assessment, and change measurement.
SN - 1651-2081
SN - 1650-1977
ER -