One Health ethics in practice: ASF, wild boars and the economic determinants of health in Spain
- 1Department of Philosophy, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
Abstract
Background: The One Health approach promotes an integrated understanding of human, animal and environmental health. However, its ethical framework remains challenged when addressing cases where non-human health threats do not directly impact human health but significantly affect socio-economic systems. The management of wild boars infected with African Swine Fever (ASF) in Spain exemplifies this tension, as these animals pose no direct zoonotic risk yet threaten food systems and economic stability, both key social determinants of health.
Methods: I combine philosophical analysis with a targeted scoping review of grey literature on ASF management in wild boar populations in Spain. Sources include policy documents, technical reports and institutional guidelines. The analysis examines how ethical justifications align with One Health principles when economic, ecological and animal health considerations intersect.
Results: Findings reveal a persistent anthropocentric bias in decision-making, where interventions are primarily justified by their economic impact rather than by consideration of animal or ecological health. This generates ethical tensions between disease control strategies (e.g., culling and confinement) and broader One Health commitments. Additionally, the case highlights how economic stability—linked to livestock production and food security—functions as a critical determinant of public health, reinforcing the prioritization of human-centered outcomes.
Conclusions: The ASF case in wild boars exposes a gap between the normative aspirations of One Health ethics and its practical implementation. It underscores the need to critically reassess how economic considerations shape public health responses and to what extent non-human health is genuinely integrated into ethical frameworks. Addressing these tensions is essential for developing more coherent and equitable One Health strategies in the face of emerging threats.
Key messages: • ASF management in wild boars shows a moral gap in One Health: economic priorities drive decisions, often sidelining animal and ecosystem health.
• Economic stability acts as a structural determinant of health, shaping public health responses even when threats are non-zoonotic.
Related
- Trends, patterns, determinants and socio-economic inequality of high-risk fertility behavior (HRFB) among Bangladeshi women: Evidence from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys
- JICS Education: Organ donation in intensive care. The law, ethics and clinical practice
- Between Likes and Ethics: Benefits and Challenges of Social Media Use in Medical Practice in a Pre- and Post-intervention Study
- Health utility, work productivity, and total economic burden of polycystic ovary syndrome
- Development of an ethical resolution process and education resources: supporting equity-focused public health ethics education through community-engaged research.
BibTeX
@article{moyanofernandez2026health,
title = {{One Health ethics in practice: ASF, wild boars and the economic determinants of health in Spain}},
author = {C Moyano-Fernández},
journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1346},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1346},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - One Health ethics in practice: ASF, wild boars and the economic determinants of health in Spain
AU - C Moyano-Fernández
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - The European Journal of Public Health
DO - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1346
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1346
AB - Background: The One Health approach promotes an integrated understanding of human, animal and environmental health. However, its ethical framework remains challenged when addressing cases where non-human health threats do not directly impact human health but significantly affect socio-economic systems. The management of wild boars infected with African Swine Fever (ASF) in Spain exemplifies this tension, as these animals pose no direct zoonotic risk yet threaten food systems and economic stability, both key social determinants of health. Methods: I combine philosophical analysis with a targeted scoping review of grey literature on ASF management in wild boar populations in Spain. Sources include policy documents, technical reports and institutional guidelines. The analysis examines how ethical justifications align with One Health principles when economic, ecological and animal health considerations intersect. Results: Findings reveal a persistent anthropocentric bias in decision-making, where interventions are primarily justified by their economic impact rather than by consideration of animal or ecological health. This generates ethical tensions between disease control strategies (e.g., culling and confinement) and broader One Health commitments. Additionally, the case highlights how economic stability—linked to livestock production and food security—functions as a critical determinant of public health, reinforcing the prioritization of human-centered outcomes. Conclusions: The ASF case in wild boars exposes a gap between the normative aspirations of One Health ethics and its practical implementation. It underscores the need to critically reassess how economic considerations shape public health responses and to what extent non-human health is genuinely integrated into ethical frameworks. Addressing these tensions is essential for developing more coherent and equitable One Health strategies in the face of emerging threats. Key messages: • ASF management in wild boars shows a moral gap in One Health: economic priorities drive decisions, often sidelining animal and ecosystem health. • Economic stability acts as a structural determinant of health, shaping public health responses even when threats are non-zoonotic.
SN - 1101-1262
SN - 1464-360X
ER -