Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Yearbook of Medical Informatics

eHealth and Telemedicine Applications in Climate Change Mitigation: A Comprehensive Analysis for the Health Information Exchange, Care Collaboration, and Patient Engagement domains

  1. 1Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Vienna Austria
  2. 2Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria; Scientific Society for Health Information Systems (WIGIS) Mils Austria

Abstract

Background: Healthcare systems account for approximately 4.4 to 4.6% of global greenhouse gas emissions. This represents a critical contradiction, as the very sector dedicated to protecting human health is contributing to environmental degradation, which in turn threatens health. Digital health technologies have the potential to provide a solution, as they enable ways to maintain optimal healthcare while protecting the environment.

Objective: The goal was to investigate how digital health technologies contribute to environmental sustainability through three primary mechanisms: Health Information Exchange systems, Care Collaboration, and Patient Engagement. This analysis evaluates empirical evidence for CO2 emissions reduction and considers the European Health Data Space initiative, as well as applications and experiences from different geographic regions.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature review focusing on peer-reviewed studies from 2012 to 2025 that quantified the environmental impacts of implementing digital health. The selection criteria prioritized studies with transparent methodological approaches and measurable environmental outcomes. Regional case studies were included to understand different implementation strategies and their environmental consequences.

Results: The analysis of large-scale systematic reviews covering more than 68 million digital health consultations shows significant benefits for the environment. CO2 savings per virtual consultation range from 0.70 to 372 kg CO2 equivalent, with differences primarily attributable to geographical factors, transport structures, and healthcare models. Avoiding unnecessary duplicate tests and reducing waste for paper and medications also make significant contributions. At the same time, the energy consumption of the technological infrastructure accounts for less than 1% of the emissions avoided through reduced travel.

Conclusions: Digital health technologies show considerable potential for reducing the environmental footprint of healthcare while maintaining or even improving clinical outcomes. To support this, it is necessary to establish standardized measurement tools, create policy frameworks, apply standardized interoperability approaches, and carefully consider equal treatment in implementation.

Related

  1. Phthalates exposure and gastrointestinal health: a comprehensive review of toxic mechanisms and emerging mitigation strategies
    Choirul Anwar, Pitchurajan Krishna Perumal, Ping-Chi Hsu +1
    Current Research in ToxicologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyPMC
  2. Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Early Disease Detection Across Modalities: A Comprehensive Review of Methods, Applications, and Clinical Translation
    Ahlem Aziz, Seydi Kacmaz, Azam Isam Abdulkareem Aladwani
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Pulsed Low-Dose-Rate Radiotherapy (PLDR): A Comprehensive Review of Radiobiological Rationale and Clinical Applications in Modern Cancer Care
    James S Welsh, Seyed Alireza Javadinia, Veronia Fahmy +4
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Artificial Intelligence Applications in Laser-Assisted Refractive Surgery—A Comprehensive Review
    Paul Filip Curcă, Mioara Laura Macovei, Ovidiu Mușat +6
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. The applications of artificial intelligence in liver transplantation: A comprehensive scoping review
    Aditya Borakati, Joshua Agilinko, Jack Wu +8
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceOncologyPLOSEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{schabetsberger2026ehealth,
  title = {{eHealth and Telemedicine Applications in Climate Change Mitigation: A Comprehensive Analysis for the Health Information Exchange, Care Collaboration, and Patient Engagement domains}},
  author = {Thomas Schabetsberger and Patrick Mangesius and Alexander Hörbst},
  journal = {Yearbook of Medical Informatics},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1055/s-0046-1816610},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1816610},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - eHealth and Telemedicine Applications in Climate Change Mitigation: A Comprehensive Analysis for the Health Information Exchange, Care Collaboration, and Patient Engagement domains
AU  - Thomas Schabetsberger
AU  - Patrick Mangesius
AU  - Alexander Hörbst
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
JO  - Yearbook of Medical Informatics
DO  - 10.1055/s-0046-1816610
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1816610
AB  - Background: Healthcare systems account for approximately 4.4 to 4.6% of global greenhouse gas emissions. This represents a critical contradiction, as the very sector dedicated to protecting human health is contributing to environmental degradation, which in turn threatens health. Digital health technologies have the potential to provide a solution, as they enable ways to maintain optimal healthcare while protecting the environment.  Objective: The goal was to investigate how digital health technologies contribute to environmental sustainability through three primary mechanisms: Health Information Exchange systems, Care Collaboration, and Patient Engagement. This analysis evaluates empirical evidence for CO2 emissions reduction and considers the European Health Data Space initiative, as well as applications and experiences from different geographic regions.  Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature review focusing on peer-reviewed studies from 2012 to 2025 that quantified the environmental impacts of implementing digital health. The selection criteria prioritized studies with transparent methodological approaches and measurable environmental outcomes. Regional case studies were included to understand different implementation strategies and their environmental consequences.  Results: The analysis of large-scale systematic reviews covering more than 68 million digital health consultations shows significant benefits for the environment. CO2 savings per virtual consultation range from 0.70 to 372 kg CO2 equivalent, with differences primarily attributable to geographical factors, transport structures, and healthcare models. Avoiding unnecessary duplicate tests and reducing waste for paper and medications also make significant contributions. At the same time, the energy consumption of the technological infrastructure accounts for less than 1% of the emissions avoided through reduced travel.  Conclusions: Digital health technologies show considerable potential for reducing the environmental footprint of healthcare while maintaining or even improving clinical outcomes. To support this, it is necessary to establish standardized measurement tools, create policy frameworks, apply standardized interoperability approaches, and carefully consider equal treatment in implementation.
SN  - 0943-4747
SN  - 2364-0502
ER  -