Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of Food Quality

A Bird’s View on Food Science and Technology Priorities for Society

Abstract

The society’s primary need is food, for which food science and technology (FST) provides a scientific basis. Food should be available, accessible and affordable for all, at any time, even amid planetary and societal challenges. One may thus ask, ‘how can food science and technology most efficiently contribute to sustainable food systems?’ This requires a strategic process of identifying and categorizing key FST themes, relating these to challenges and exploring them in food systems contexts. Main FST orientations must then be elaborated and prioritized with respect to potential futures. A coherent set of five methodologies is proposed herein to support this process. These include reviewing agendas, thought‐experiments, dynamic game methods, an operational bird concept and a scenario development tool. The first results reveal the following prioritized main FST orientations: (1) carbon‐neutral products, (2)/(3) security of diverse diets and zero‐input–output loss, (4) nature‐ and culture‐inspired products and (5) scalable mobile technologies. The orientations are part of and presented in a complex food systems web. Repeating this exercise by an EFFoST‐driven initiative involving FST experts and young professionals is strongly recommended. They are capable of broadly overseeing challenges, categories of FST themes and orientations, food system actors and scenarios of (their) potential futures.

Related

  1. Digital psychiatric biomarkers beyond the walls: a Science and Technology Studies view
    Vincent P. Martin, Elodie Gratreau, Stephane Mouchabac +2
    L'EncéphalePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral biologyPsychiatry & mental healthHAL
  2. Engagement in food system-related controversies can strengthen science–policy–society interfaces
    Louise E. Jackson, Philippe Jarne, Paul Shrivastava +9
    Nature FoodPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral biologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHALHAL
  3. According to a large citizen science dataset, UK farmland bird indicator species and other bird groups, are more likely to be found on farms with shoots than on otherwise similar farms
    R. B. Sage, L. Costick, A. M. Lole +3
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEcologybioRxiv
  4. A Vision-Language Model as a Teacher for Bird Vocalization Detection
    G. Vengrovski, T. J. Gardner
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textZoology & animal behaviourbioRxiv
  5. Beyond the urban surface: bird-borne sensing reveals the atmospheric structure of urban heat
    G. Grosso, G. Dell'Omo, C. Carere
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEcologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{vries2026birds,
  title = {{A Bird’s View on Food Science and Technology Priorities for Society}},
  author = {Hugo de Vries},
  journal = {Journal of Food Quality},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1155/jfq/9295106},
  url = {https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05761068v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A Bird’s View on Food Science and Technology Priorities for Society
AU  - Hugo de Vries
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/23
JO  - Journal of Food Quality
DO  - 10.1155/jfq/9295106
UR  - https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05761068v1
AB  - The society’s primary need is food, for which food science and technology (FST) provides a scientific basis. Food should be available, accessible and affordable for all, at any time, even amid planetary and societal challenges. One may thus ask, ‘how can food science and technology most efficiently contribute to sustainable food systems?’ This requires a strategic process of identifying and categorizing key FST themes, relating these to challenges and exploring them in food systems contexts. Main FST orientations must then be elaborated and prioritized with respect to potential futures. A coherent set of five methodologies is proposed herein to support this process. These include reviewing agendas, thought‐experiments, dynamic game methods, an operational bird concept and a scenario development tool. The first results reveal the following prioritized main FST orientations: (1) carbon‐neutral products, (2)/(3) security of diverse diets and zero‐input–output loss, (4) nature‐ and culture‐inspired products and (5) scalable mobile technologies. The orientations are part of and presented in a complex food systems web. Repeating this exercise by an EFFoST‐driven initiative involving FST experts and young professionals is strongly recommended. They are capable of broadly overseeing challenges, categories of FST themes and orientations, food system actors and scenarios of (their) potential futures.
SN  - 0146-9428
SN  - 1745-4557
ER  -