Digital psychiatric biomarkers beyond the walls: a Science and Technology Studies view
Abstract
Background. As traditional biomarkers have failed to deliver on promises of personalized diagnosis and treatment in psychiatry, digital biomarkers offer continuous and ecologically valid monitoring. By capturing symptoms directly within patients' everyday environments, they support a systemic approach to psychiatry. However, this ecological dimension challenges conventional validation criteria and requires in situ validation beyond research laboratories. Objectives. This study has two aims: first, to identify and compare standardization documents that could support validation standards for digital biomarkers in psychiatry; second, to situate these documents within a circulation framework between laboratories and the real world, inspired by the sociology of innovation, in order to analyze their dynamics. Methods. Standardization documents relating to the validation of digital biomarkers and smartphone applications in psychiatry were identified through expert selection. Their main dimensions were extracted and mapped onto a framework linking laboratories and the "wider world." This process was conducted by an interdisciplinary consortium combining computer science, psychiatry, and Science and Technology Studies (STS). Results. Four heterogeneous standardization documents were identified. Mapping their components within the circulation framework enabled comparison of the documents and of the design constraints they implement. Discussion. The findings suggest that these standardization documents are not yet stabilized. Rather than fixed standards, they function as tools for negotiation between epistemic communities and actors with unequal power relations, within academic infrastructures that maintain biases. This highlights the need for a sociotechnical democracy in mental health. Conclusion. STS provides valuable tools for understanding the dynamics of standardization and the plurality of actors involved in validating digital biomarkers in psychiatry.
Related
- Psychiatric Biomarkers: Reliability, Reductionism, and Epistemic (In)Justice in the DSM-6
- A Bird’s View on Food Science and Technology Priorities for Society
- Psychometric validation of the perceived digital well-being scale and digital well-being questionnaire among adolescents receiving psychiatric care
- Digital technology investments in French farms: a classification based on total cost of ownership
- Design and Uses of an Educational Guide on Digital Technology in Agriculture: The Case of an Inter-RMT Initiative
BibTeX
@article{martin2026digital,
title = {{Digital psychiatric biomarkers beyond the walls: a Science and Technology Studies view}},
author = {Vincent P. Martin and Elodie Gratreau and Stephane Mouchabac and Gemma Serrano and Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi},
journal = {L'Encéphale},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1016/j.encep.2026.07.004},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05633834v2},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Digital psychiatric biomarkers beyond the walls: a Science and Technology Studies view
AU - Vincent P. Martin
AU - Elodie Gratreau
AU - Stephane Mouchabac
AU - Gemma Serrano
AU - Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/19
JO - L'Encéphale
DO - 10.1016/j.encep.2026.07.004
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05633834v2
AB - Background. As traditional biomarkers have failed to deliver on promises of personalized diagnosis and treatment in psychiatry, digital biomarkers offer continuous and ecologically valid monitoring. By capturing symptoms directly within patients' everyday environments, they support a systemic approach to psychiatry. However, this ecological dimension challenges conventional validation criteria and requires in situ validation beyond research laboratories. Objectives. This study has two aims: first, to identify and compare standardization documents that could support validation standards for digital biomarkers in psychiatry; second, to situate these documents within a circulation framework between laboratories and the real world, inspired by the sociology of innovation, in order to analyze their dynamics. Methods. Standardization documents relating to the validation of digital biomarkers and smartphone applications in psychiatry were identified through expert selection. Their main dimensions were extracted and mapped onto a framework linking laboratories and the "wider world." This process was conducted by an interdisciplinary consortium combining computer science, psychiatry, and Science and Technology Studies (STS). Results. Four heterogeneous standardization documents were identified. Mapping their components within the circulation framework enabled comparison of the documents and of the design constraints they implement. Discussion. The findings suggest that these standardization documents are not yet stabilized. Rather than fixed standards, they function as tools for negotiation between epistemic communities and actors with unequal power relations, within academic infrastructures that maintain biases. This highlights the need for a sociotechnical democracy in mental health. Conclusion. STS provides valuable tools for understanding the dynamics of standardization and the plurality of actors involved in validating digital biomarkers in psychiatry.
SN - 0013-7006
ER -